Kevin Doets has produced another Ally Pally shock dumping out Nathan Aspinall while the wonder runs continue for 'Champagne' Charlie Manby and 'Happy Feet' Justin Hood as the final match in the latter stages of the PDC World Darts Championship takes place later.
ADVERTISEMENT
Doets has form for it and he took down Aspinall 4-3 in sets with a 97.48 average, 11 180's and five ton plus checkouts including 164, 121, 112, 106 and 100. Superb from 'Hawkeye'. Six wins on the trot for Doets over Aspinall.
Follow the 2026 World Darts Championship via our live scores!
Follow the 2026 World Darts Championship via our live scores!
Despite bounceout issues, Doets levelled early on but Aspinall took the opening set breaking at an opportune time to seal the set with a 76 checkout.
Doets missed 146 to level at 1-1 in the second and break back after Aspinall took the opening leg but 'Hawkeye' finally claimed it on double 16 for 1-1. A 76 checkout and Aspinall had the opening set breaking to win 3-1 to go 1-0 up. Doets missed 146 to level at 1-1 in the second and break back after Aspinall took the opening leg but 'Hawkeye' finally claimed it on double 16 for 1-1.
Doets pinned double eight to go one away from the second set. Aspinall missed 68 but didn't have much else coming back as he made it 2-2 and needed a break for the second set. Aspinall missed 117 for the set and Doets took out double eight.
Read also
Aspinall opened the third set on double two it. Aspinall hit an 85 checkout albeit he looked a bit hot and bothered and flustered up there albeit he took a 2-0 lead in set three. Aspinall missed the second double eight and Doets picked his pocket for 2-1 down. But Aspinall sent it to a decider and took the third set to sit 2-1 up.
An 81 checkout to break for Aspinall who lead and was throwing for a 2-0 lead. 168 to leave double four for Aspinall with Doets needing 167 but he could only set up and Aspinall hit double four for 2-0. Aspinall missed 108 for a 3-1 lead in sets and Doets got three at double 20 only to miss all three but so did Asp as Doets hit double 10 to go 2-1 down.
ADVERTISEMENT
A 121 checkout saw Doets suddenly throw for it and he hit double one finally for the set. Aspinall began set five with a 150 checkout. Doets broke for 2-1 and was throwing for the set. Aspinall won the set pinning 170. Doets went one set away with a 164 checkout and he hit an incredible 96 checkout using two double 19's. Aspinall set himself up but Doets hit double 10 to seal the win.
Charlie Manby continues champagne run
Manby faced off against Ricky Evans and sealed a 4-2 win against the Kettering high flying quick thrower who seemed to have issues late on and fell apart as his run of not reaching the Last 16 continue.
For 'Champagne', he continued a landmark run at Ally Pally and could now face Gian van Veen in the Last 16.
To start, Manby hit a 57 checkout to level up at 1-1 and was gunning for the Evans throw. Manby missed 110 but Evans couldn't pin the bull for 84 albeit Manby missed more darts to break and Evans hit double eight off 25 for 2-1. Evans hit double two to seal the opening set and broke to go 2-1 up and was one away from the second set.
ADVERTISEMENT
Manby broke on double nine and was throwing for the set. A 25 checkout and Manby made it 1-1. Manby was first to a finish but missed darts and Evans hit a 134 to hold. Manby missed double 19 and Evans hit back. Manby missed 127 and three darts to break after Evans missed a chance and Evans was 2-1 up in sets. Doubles continued to be their achilles heel as Manby eventually pinned double one after both had missed droves. An 85 checkout for Evans saw him quick as you like to draw level at 1-1.
Read also
The quickest 180 at that juncture from Evans but Manby hit double 20 to go one away from drawing it level at 2-1. Double 20 for Evans and to a decider it went. Manby hit double 10 for the set pinning 48 to make it 2-2.
Manby started superbly in a pivotal set hitting a ten darter on double 18. Evans hit a 68 checkout though to render that Manby 10-darter irrelevant though and he was now throwing for 2-1. Manby then broke straight back going 2-1 up and was throwing for a 3-2 lead. Manby missed three at double 16 but Evans had thrown 15 darts without getting past the halfway line and 'Champagne' eventually hit double 16 for 3-2 up.
A 180 and 42 checkout saw Manby go two away at 1-0 and he sealed the win from there. What a game could be in store between Champagne and GVV The Giant.
ADVERTISEMENT
Dream revives for Hood
While the dream is still alive for 'Happy Feet' Justin Hood of owning a Chinese restaurant. He saw off Ryan Meikle who could not reproduce the heroics that saw him come back to see off Jonny Tata.
Hood missed droves of darts at double to hold and open the tie and Meikle hit a double double 100 checkout to lead the way and break. Hood hit back with a 115 checkout to settle himself down on double 20. He drew level at 1-1 in the early going.
Hood hit 180 and eventually double one but Meikle hit back to level up at 2-2 as Hood was throwing for the first set. Hood responded to his poor start with a 64 checkout to lead 1-0 in the race to four against Meikle.
Hood broke to start set two and Meikle broke back to make it 1-1 pinning double 10. Hood hit a superb 128 checkout on the bull as Meikle waited on a finish. Hood missed set darts but Meikle could not pin 164 and he returned for double one clipping the dart in just about.
ADVERTISEMENT
Meikle missed darts to seal a break and Hood cashed in holding throw to lead the third set. A fourth maximum for Hood and a 124 checkout on the bull saw Hood surge 2-0 up in the third set in the race to four. Meikle missed 121 on the bull and Hood returned for double 10 for 3-0.
Hood had chances to break off 98 and Meikle was given just a shot at 68 and he held after missed break chances. Hood though returned to hit double 14 to draw level at 1-1. Meikle hit a 146 though to keep himself alive as Hood was throwing to send it to a decider. A 147 checkout saw Meikle take the set amid Hood being sat waiting for a chance to send it all the way. A 70 checkout saw Hood lead set five. But Meikle hit back with 75.
Hood missed 120 on double 10 but he missed further darts and gave Meikle got a poke at 66 on double 20 which he missed for a break and 'Happy Feet' returned for double five. But Hood sealed the 4-1 win.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 120visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







