Players Championship Order of Merit Update: Luke Littler and Michael van Gerwen see Minehead hopes fade, Aspinall completes last gasp push
PDCThe Players Championship Order of Merit has been updated after the latest tournament which saw Jermaine Wattimena scoop the title but more pertinent is the race to Minehead and in particular the top names both in and out of contention.
ADVERTISEMENT
Michael van Gerwen is all but gone and seems to have left the country entirely. He has one event to qualify as he misses the final two due to a family holiday in Dubai and was reportedly spotted at Manchester Airport soon after his loss to Dom Taylor on Tuesday. He has a bit of a different complexion to others as others will likely play the last block.
But after a pretty woeful year on the ProTour he seems set to miss it for the first time since 2009 and there is mixed news for the smattering of big names who also haven't made it.
Luke Littler to a lesser extent is in the same boat as Van Gerwen and also has yet to play his way into the top-64. The reigning world champion is currently 73rd on the Players Championship Order of Merit and his deficit is manageable with three tournaments to go. Littler needs to make up 2,500 pounds, a task Littler should normally be able to meet.
Nathan Aspinall was also outside the top-64 prior to Players Championship 31, but has secured his spot after reaching the final in Wigan. 'The Asp' successively defeated Thibault Tricole (6-2), Steve Lennon (6-4), Ryan Joyce (6-2), Lukas Wenig (6-5), James Wade (6-5) and Stephen Bunting (7-3), while also notching two nine darters. Aspinall eventually lost in the final to Jermaine Wattimena, but did pocket 10,000 pounds in prize money. That was more than enough for Aspinall to firmly establish himself in the top 64. He did not play in the event last year and often has skipped ProTours so this will delight him.
Luke Humphries lost in the second round but is just about in the provisional spots. He will hope for one run tomorrow to fully confirm him so he doesn't have to return for the next block as the events stack up ahead of Minehead.
Read also
Wattimena firmly in top-10 after second PDC title
ADVERTISEMENT
The big winner of the day was Jermaine Wattimena, who captured his second PDC ranking title in magnificent fashion. In the first round, he escaped elimination against Christian Kist, who lost a 5-3 lead and missed six matchdarts.
Wattimena then won from Madars Razma (6-4) and Niko Springer (6-4), before advancing to the final with big wins over Martin Schindler (6-2), Chris Landman (6-1) and Niels Zonneveld (7-0). In the final match, he gave two-time major winner Aspinall a big beating 8-2. With £15,000 in prize money won, Wattimena is now sixth in the floor rankings.
Price continues to lead ranking
Gerwyn Price is still the leader on the Players Championship Order of Merit after 31 of 34 tournaments with 99,500 pounds. Nothing more will be added to that this week, as 'The Iceman' is missing from the double header in Wigan.
Behind Price, Gian van Veen and Ross Smith are both on £89,000, while Damon Heta is number four with £87,500, before Jermaine Wattimena then Stephen Bunting complete the top five.
ADVERTISEMENT
Wessel Nijman is in spot seven with £74,500, while Cameron Menzies (£70,500), Chris Dobey (£66,500) and Josh Rock (£65,500) complete the top-10.
Players Championship Order of Merit after Event 31
| Rank | Name | Prize money (in units of £1000) |
| 1 | Gerwyn Price | 99.5 |
| 2 | Gian van Veen | 89 |
| 3 | Ross Smith | 89 |
| 4 | Damon Heta | 87.5 |
| 5 | Jermaine Wattimena | 81 |
| 6 | Stephen Bunting | 78.5 |
| 7 | Wessel Nijman | 74.5 |
| 8 | Cameron Menzies | 70.5 |
| 9 | Chris Dobey | 66.5 |
| 10 | Josh Rock | 65.5 |
| 11 | Ryan Searle | 65.5 |
| 12 | Jonny Clayton | 64 |
| 13 | Martin Schindler | 59 |
| 14 | Danny Noppert | 58.5 |
| 15 | Joe Cullen | 57.5 |
| 16 | Niels Zonneveld | 55.5 |
| 17 | Dirk van Duijvenbode | 55.5 |
| 18 | James Wade | 54.5 |
| 19 | Gary Anderson | 53.5 |
| 20 | Scott Williams | 47.5 |
| 21 | William O'Connor | 46.5 |
| 22 | Kevin Doets | 46.5 |
| 23 | Brendan Dolan | 45.5 |
| 24 | Bradley Brooks | 45 |
| 25 | Krzysztof Ratajski | 44.5 |
| 26 | Dave Chisnall | 42.5 |
| 27 | Mike De Decker | 41.5 |
| 28 | Andrew Gilding | 40.5 |
| 29 | Jeffrey de Graaf | 39.5 |
| 30 | Sebastian Bialecki | 39.5 |
| 31 | Luke Woodhouse | 39 |
| 32 | Rob Cross | 38 |
| 33 | Karel Sedlacek | 37.5 |
| 34 | Dom Taylor | 35 |
| 35 | Ian White | 34.5 |
| 36 | Raymond van Barneveld | 33 |
| 37 | Martin Lukeman | 33 |
| 38 | Daryl Gurney | 33 |
| 39 | Callan Rydz | 33 |
| 40 | Alan Soutar | 32 |
| 41 | Cam Crabtree | 31.5 |
| 42 | Mario Vandenbogaerde | 31.5 |
| 43 | Nathan Aspinall | 30.5 |
| 44 | Michael Smith | 30 |
| 45 | Ryan Joyce | 28.5 |
| 46 | Ricardo Pietreczko | 28.5 |
| 47 | James Hurrell | 28 |
| 48 | Madars Razma | 27.5 |
| 49 | Darren Beveridge | 27.5 |
| 50 | Nick Kenny | 27.5 |
| 51 | Wesley Plaisier | 27 |
| 52 | Gabriel Clemens | 27 |
| 53 | Mickey Mansell | 26.5 |
| 54 | Dominik Gruellich | 26.5 |
| 55 | Justin Hood | 26 |
| 56 | Luke Humphries | 26 |
| 57 | Adam Lipscombe | 26 |
| 58 | Peter Wright | 26 |
| 59 | Ricky Evans | 25.5 |
| 60 | Ryan Meikle | 25 |
| 61 | Max Hopp | 24.5 |
| 62 | Steve Lennon | 24 |
| 63 | Lukas Wenig | 23.5 |
| 64 | Niko Springer | 23.5 |
| 65 | Richard Veenstra | 23 |
| 66 | Ritchie Edhouse | 23 |
| 67 | Keane Barry | 23 |
| 68 | Mensur Suljovic | 22 |
| 69 | Stephen Burton | 22 |
| 70 | Matthew Dennant | 21.5 |
| 71 | Owen Bates | 21.5 |
| 72 | Darius Labanauskas | 21 |
| 73 | Luke Littler | 21 |
| 74 | Kim Huybrechts | 20.5 |
| 75 | Andy Boulton | 20.5 |
| 76 | Chris Landman | 19.5 |
| 77 | Robert Grundy | 19.5 |
| 78 | Connor Scutt | 19.5 |
| 79 | Jelle Klaasen | 19.5 |
| 80 | Adam Hunt | 19 |
| 81 | Maik Kuivenhoven | 18.5 |
| 82 | Thibault Tricole | 18.5 |
| 83 | Andy Baetens | 17.5 |
| 84 | Jamai van den Herik | 17.5 |
| 85 | Jitse Van der Wal | 17.5 |
| 86 | Dylan Slevin | 17.5 |
| 87 | Martijn Dragt | 17 |
| 88 | Darryl Pilgrim | 17 |
| 89 | Patrick Geeraets | 16.5 |
| 90 | Florian Hempel | 16 |
| 91 | Rob Owen | 16 |
| 92 | Marvin van Velzen | 15 |
| 93 | Michael van Gerwen | 14.5 |
| 94 | Haupai Puha | 14.5 |
| 95 | Jose de Sousa | 14 |
| 96 | Tom Bissell | 13.5 |
| 97 | Adam Warner | 13.5 |
| 98 | Viktor Tingstrom | 12.5 |
| 99 | Jim Long | 12.5 |
| 100 | Christian Kist | 12.5 |
| 101 | Cor Dekker | 12.5 |
| 102 | Mervyn King | 12.5 |
| 103 | Carl Sneyd | 12.5 |
| 104 | Dimitri Van den Bergh | 12 |
| 105 | Alexander Merkx | 12 |
| 106 | Brett Claydon | 12 |
| 107 | Michele Turetta | 11.5 |
| 108 | Stefan Bellmont | 11.5 |
| 109 | Berry van Peer | 11.5 |
| 110 | Andreas Harrysson | 11 |
| 111 | Leon Weber | 11 |
| 112 | Radek Szaganski | 10.5 |
| 113 | Thomas Lovely | 10.5 |
| 114 | Nathan Rafferty | 10.5 |
| 115 | Rhys Griffin | 10 |
| 116 | Greg Ritchie | 10 |
| 117 | Maximilian Czerwinski | 10 |
| 118 | Jimmy van Schie | 10 |
| 119 | Kevin Burness | 9.5 |
| 120 | George Killington | 9 |
| 121 | Matt Campbell | 9 |
| 122 | Benjamin Reus | 9 |
| 123 | Ted Evetts | 9 |
| 124 | Joe Hunt | 8.5 |
| 125 | Tavis Dudeney | 8.5 |
| 126 | Danny Lauby | 8 |
| 127 | Danny van Trijp | 8 |
| 128 | Graham Hall | 7.5 |
| 129 | Stefaan Henderyck | 7.5 |
| 130 | Oskar Lukasiak | 7.5 |
| 131 | William Borland | 7.5 |
| 132 | Tytus Kanik | 7 |
| 133 | Joshua Richardson | 7 |
| 134 | Dennie Olde Kalter | 6.5 |
| 135 | Jim Williams | 6.5 |
| 136 | Adam Paxton | 6.5 |
| 137 | Rusty-Jake Rodriguez | 6.5 |
| 138 | Jack Tweddell | 5.5 |
| 139 | Beau Greaves | 5.5 |
| 140 | Kai Gotthardt | 5 |
| 141 | Jarno Bottenberg | 5 |
| 142 | Tommy Lishman | 5 |
| 143 | Michael Unterbuchner | 4.5 |
| 144 | Pero Ljubic | 4.5 |
| 145 | Tom Sykes | 4 |
| 146 | Michael Flynn | 3.5 |
| 147 | Henry Coates | 3.5 |
| 148 | Scott Campbell | 3 |
| 149 | Scott Waites | 2.5 |
| 150 | Dragutin Horvat | 2.5 |
| 151 | Sam Spivey | 2.5 |
| 152 | David Davies | 2.5 |
| 153 | Arno Brand | 2.5 |
| 154 | Jeffrey Sparidaans | 2.5 |
| 155 | Martin Thomas | 2 |
| 156 | Aden Kirk | 2 |
| 157 | Charlie Manby | 1.5 |
| 158 | Sietse Lap | 1.5 |
| 159 | Jenson Walker | 1 |
| 159 | Lee Cocks | 1 |
| 161 | Ron Meulenkamp | 1 |
| 162 | Nathan Girvan | 1 |
| 163 | Graham Usher | 1 |
| 164 | Tim Wolters | 1 |

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 3visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026




