The
renewed doping case involving
Dom Taylor is not only making headlines at the 2026 Darts World Championship, but also sparking debate over the current tournament rules. The Englishman was suspended with immediate effect by the
Darts Regulation Authority (DRA) following an adverse analytical finding and removed from the ongoing competition. His opening win over
Oskar Lukasiak is therefore effectively rendered meaningless.
Under the regulations of the
PDC, the next opponent automatically benefits in such a case:
Jonny Clayton receives a bye into the third round. For Lukasiak, however, the tournament is over – even though his conqueror has now been excluded for a doping offense.
This exact point raises questions.
No second chance for Lukasiak
Under the current rulebook, the PDC does not provide for reinstatement of already defeated players, even if the winner is later disqualified. The reason: brackets should not be altered retrospectively to maintain sporting and organizational clarity. This practice is common in other sports as well.
- Tennis: At Grand Slams, lucky losers move in only before the tournament starts. If a player is later disqualified (e.g., for doping), there is no reinstatement for defeated opponents.
- Football (knockout competitions): In cup competitions, a match result stands even if a player is later banned or disqualified. The eliminated opponent does not get a second chance.
- Boxing: If a winner is later stripped for doping, the bout may be ruled a no contest or a loss, but the defeated boxer does not automatically progress.
- Mixed Martial Arts (MMA / UFC): Here too, fights are often annulled in later doping cases without retroactively changing tournament progression.
- Olympic competitions (individual knockout): Medals can be stripped, but eliminated athletes do not advance if the event has already concluded.
Nevertheless, many fans find the situation unsatisfying. Lukasiak has no chance to face Clayton, even though his first-round opponent has now been excluded from the tournament for a rules violation. Clayton advances without throwing a dart.
Fairness versus tournament logic
The question is therefore less legal than fundamental: Are the existing rules still fair? Should a player eliminated by an opponent who is later disqualified get a second chance? Or would that contradict the core principle of a knockout tournament?
Supporters of the current regulations argue that clear structures are indispensable – especially at a major event like the World Championship.
Critics, however, see a sporting imbalance when a player suffers twice: first through a defeat, then through the opponent’s doping case.
We want your opinion
The Dom Taylor case brings this issue back into focus. That’s why we want to know: