Preview Saturday evening UK Open: Heavyweight clashes await including Van Gerwen-Wade and Littler-Anderson
PDCThe UK Open began on Friday afternoon with 157 entrants, but after five rounds only sixteen remain. They will battle on Saturday evening for a spot on the FA Cup of Darts final day.
ADVERTISEMENT
Notably, many big names are still in the tournament. No fewer than eleven players from the top 12 of the PDC Order of Merit have survived the early cull. With an open draw at the UK Open, mouthwatering ties in the last 16 were inevitable. And that is exactly how it panned out.
The last 16 features three clashes between players who have previously reached a UK Open final. The format at this stage remains unchanged. Ten legs are required to progress to the next round.
Stephen Bunting v Josh Rock
A Premier League blockbuster in the UK Open last 16 was bound to happen with the remaining field. Stephen Bunting has not been troubled so far in this tournament. He opened in the fourth round with a 10-5 win over Thibault Tricole, and backed it up with a 10-2 victory against Mensur Suljovic. Josh Rock had a real scare on Friday night against William O'Connor, only edging through 10-9 in a last-leg decider. He then proved too strong for Dominik Gruellich with a 10-7 success.
Read also
Martin Lukeman v Jonny Clayton
Martin Lukeman could do with a boost. After his sensational run to the Grand Slam of Darts final in 2024, ‘Smash’ had few highlights. He was anonymous in 2025 and his 2026 start was hardly electric either. A place in the UK Open last 16 is encouraging at least, and against Jonny Clayton, ‘Smash’ has the chance—after wins over Thomas Lovely (6-4), Ritchie Edhouse (10-6) and Madars Razma (10-3)—to turn it into a quarterfinal. Clayton, however, is red hot. ‘The Ferret’ leads the Premier League Darts and cruised past Alexander Merkx (10-2) and Darryl Pilgrim (10-7) earlier in this tournament.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gary Anderson v Luke Littler
This promises to be a treat. Two quick throwers who typically pile in the 180s. And if Gary Anderson brings his earlier-tournament form, Luke Littler will have a fight on his hands. The Scot beat Dirk van Duijvenbode (10-6) and Martin Schindler (10-7), averaging 107.42 and 105.80 respectively. Littler has yet to fully ignite in Minehead. He opened with a 10-3 win over Damon Heta but averaged only 94.81. Against Kevin Doets he escaped defeat, moving on 10-8—arguably against the run of play.
LITTLER BATTLES THROUGH! ☢️
— PDC Darts (@OfficialPDC) March 7, 2026
Luke Littler survives a scare in Minehead!
The reigning champion denies a spirited Kevin Doets to preserve his title hopes!
Live Scores & Streaming 📲 https://t.co/gFQK4rQ2wU#UKOpenDarts | R5 pic.twitter.com/ouQaZbs9yw
Daryl Gurney v Rob Cross
In 2025 Daryl Gurney was increasingly visible in the business end of events, and the Northern Irishman appears to have carried that into 2026. He first beat Niels Zonneveld 10-7, then edged Ross Smith 10-8 to reach the last 16. Rob Cross ended the run of Gian van Veen on Friday night, the only player from the world’s top 12 who failed to reach the last 16. On Saturday afternoon Cross’s campaign hung by a thread, but ‘Voltage’ overturned a 7-9 deficit against Mike De Decker to win 10-9.
ADVERTISEMENT
Michael van Gerwen v James Wade
Two of the most successful UK Open players ever will duel for a quarterfinal berth. Both have lifted the FA Cup of Darts three times, a feat only bettered by Phil Taylor (5x). Michael van Gerwen was made to work in his opener after drawing Nathan Aspinall in round four. With a 101.89 average, ‘The Asp’ was seen off 10-8. Van Gerwen then produced a patchy display against Kai Gotthardt, but the German fell 10-6. James Wade survived a last-leg decider against Chris Dobey in his first match and then comfortably beat Gabriel Clemens 10-2.

Michael van Gerwen and James Wade have both won the UK Open three times
Gerwyn Price v Keane Barry
Not a bad draw, Gerwyn Price will think. After a 10-3 win over Greg Ritchie, Price cleared his first real test 10-5 against Wessel Nijman. Next up is Keane Barry, the lowest-ranked player left in the event. The UK Open is where Barry stunned many by reaching the last four in 2022. By making the last 16 he has already strengthened his bid to keep his Tour Card later this year. En route to this round he defeated Kim Huybrechts (6-5), Henry Coates (10-2) and Ryan Joyce (10-7).
ADVERTISEMENT
Luke Humphries v Danny Noppert
Another heavyweight clash in this UK Open last 16, featuring two players in fine form. Luke Humphries breezed through his first two matches. Luke Woodhouse was brushed aside 10-3, with ‘Cool Hand Luke’ averaging 105.16. He then beat Dave Chisnall 10-4 with a 103.65 average. Noppert dispatched Dimitri Van den Bergh (10-4) and Peter Wright (10-2) by wide margins, and the Dutchman also produced a superb nine-darter against Van den Bergh.
Luke Humphries and Danny Noppert have both shown strong form earlier in this tournament
Ryan Searle v Krzysztof Ratajski
The remaining tie in this round pits Ryan Searle against Krzysztof Ratajski, a draw that offers both a real shot at a major quarterfinal. Minehead local Ryan Searle first beat Andy Boulton 10-7, then scraped past Michael Smith 10-9. Krzysztof Ratajski made short work of Ricky Evans (10-4) before proving too strong for Oskar Lukasiak (10-5) in round five.
ADVERTISEMENT
Draw & schedule UK Open 2026
Saturday 03/07
Evening session (from 7:00 PM)
Main stage
| Stephen Bunting | v | Josh Rock | L16 |
| Gary Anderson | v | Luke Littler | L16 |
| Michael van Gerwen | v | James Wade | L16 |
| Luke Humphries | v | Danny Noppert | L16 |
ADVERTISEMENT
Board 2
| Martin Lukeman | v | Jonny Clayton | L16 |
| Daryl Gurney | v | Rob Cross | L16 |
| Gerwyn Price | v | Keane Barry | L16 |
| Ryan Searle | v | Krzysztof Ratajski | L16 |

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026




