Preview Sunday afternoon UK Open: Quarter-Finals headlined by Welsh titan clash between Clayton and Price
PDC
Eight players remain in contention for the title at the UK Open 2026 in Minehead. The final day gets underway on Sunday afternoon with the quarterfinals first, before the semifinals and final are played in the evening.
ADVERTISEMENT
Three former UK Open champions have made the last eight. Defending champion Luke Littler is still chasing back-to-back titles, and he meets former winner Danny Noppert. James Wade is also among the contenders. Who reaches the last four? We look ahead in our preview.
Draw & schedule UK Open 2026
Sunday, March 8
Afternoon session (from 1:00 PM)
| Krzysztof Ratajski | v | Josh Rock | QF |
| James Wade | v | Rob Cross | QF |
| Luke Littler | v | Danny Noppert | QF |
| Jonny Clayton | v | Gerwyn Price | QF |
Krzysztof Ratajski v Josh Rock
A draw both will probably be content with. For the second time in his career, Krzysztof Ratajski is in the last eight of the FA Cup of Darts. And judging by the scorelines, Ratajski hasn’t had to dig too deep yet. The Warsaw thrower defeated Ricky Evans (10-4), Oskar Lukasiak (10-5), and Ryan Searle (10-5) in succession. It yields another hefty chunk of prize money for the rankings, after he also reached the World Championship quarterfinals earlier this season.
ADVERTISEMENT
Josh Rock reached the semifinals in Minehead last year, and is well on course to at least match that achievement in 2026. Rocky escaped elimination in the fourth round against William O’Connor (10-9), but then took care of Dominik Gruellich (10-7) and Stephen Bunting (10-7).
The head-to-head is not a great omen for Ratajski. These two have met thirteen times before, and Rock has won no fewer than eleven, including the last six meetings.
Josh Rock can reach the UK Open semifinals for the second year running
James Wade v Rob Cross
James Wade delivered a masterclass on Saturday night in his clash with Michael van Gerwen. The Dutchman was sloppy early on, but once Wade got a grip, the game was gone. An average of 105.83, five 180s, and a 59 percent checkout rate were the sparkling numbers Wade posted. Before that, Wade had already beaten Chris Dobey (10-9) and Gabriel Clemens (10-2). Wade has won the UK Open three times before, though remarkably never in Minehead.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Rob Cross laid down an early marker on Friday night with an excellent 10-7 win over world number three Gian van Veen. In the fifth round, Cross battled back from 7-9 down against Mike De Decker to edge the Belgian 10-9. He then beat Daryl Gurney 10-6 to reach the last eight. The former world champion also did so in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2024, but only in 2019 did Cross win his quarterfinal. He then lost the final to Nathan Aspinall.
This will be the 24th meeting between the two Englishmen. On past form, Wade is a slight favorite. The left-hander has walked off the stage as winner thirteen times, compared to ten for Cross.
James Wade was in superb touch against Michael van Gerwen on Saturday night
Luke Littler v Danny Noppert
ADVERTISEMENT
Danny Noppert knocked out one Luke, and immediately faces the other. The Freeze drove Luke Humphries to despair on Saturday night. Cool Hand Luke squandered a host of doubles, while Noppert took his chances superbly to dump Humphries 10-6. Earlier, Noppert had already stolen the show with a nine-darter against Dimitri Van den Bergh, a match he won 10-4. He also swept aside two-time world champion Peter Wright 10-2.
Big names one after another, and now the best player of the moment awaits. Littler, though, hasn’t been as untouchable as he can be. Against Damon Heta (10-3), The Nuke won without dazzling, while the defending champion in Minehead was actually second best against Kevin Doets (10-8) in the last 32. Against Gary Anderson, however, Littler was back to a high level. The 19-year-old Englishman won that match 10-5 with a 102.48 average.
Noppert has beaten Littler once before. That came at a Euro Tour event in September 2025. The other three matches all went Littler’s way, including a 16-9 win in last year’s Grand Slam of Darts semifinals. Both men know what it takes to win the UK Open. Littler did so last year, while Noppert surprisingly lifted the trophy in Minehead in 2022.
Danny Noppert faces a tough task to reach the last four in Minehead
Jonny Clayton v Gerwyn Price
ADVERTISEMENT
At least one Welshman will feature in the UK Open semifinals, as Jonny Clayton and Gerwyn Price face off to decide the final semifinalist at this edition. This will be Clayton’s first standout opponent of the tournament, as The Ferret has yet to be seriously tested. He brushed aside Alexander Merkx 10-2 in his opener, followed by a 10-7 win over Darryl Pilgrim. Martin Lukeman couldn’t trouble Jonny Clayton much either, eventually losing 10-7 to the former Premier League champion.
That Price is still in the tournament is nothing short of a miracle. After wins over Greg Ritchie (10-3) and Wessel Nijman (10-5), the former rugby player’s run suddenly hung by a thread in the last 16. The Iceman started poorly against Keane Barry and trailed 4-9 after thirteen legs. Suddenly the engine kicked in, and on his birthday no less, Price produced a stunning comeback. With two 12-darters and checkouts of 81, 90, and 71, the former world champion turned it around to win 10-9.
Read also
After all these years on tour together, Price and Clayton have no secrets left for each other. Not only have they teamed up for Wales at the World Cup of Darts for years, they’ve also played 41 official matches against each other. Price clearly holds the edge over his compatriot, as The Iceman has beaten Clayton 29 times. The Ferret did defeat Price in February in the Premier League, his first win over Price in three years. Last week, however, Price took immediate revenge on Clayton at a Players Championship event.

No Welsh player has ever won the UK Open
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





