The Quarter-Final line-up is confirmed at Players Championship 26 with Luke Littler being dumped out by Raymond van Barneveld who continues his epic form.
ADVERTISEMENT
Littler averaged 101. But he was well beaten by the doyen of Dutch darts who sealed a 6-2 win with a 104 average. But while Littler has gone out, the same cannot be said for Luke Humphries who now faces Dave Chisnall. Josh Rock and Ritchie Edhouse have fell by the wayside as a result. Stephen Bunting faces Robert Owen.
While Danny Noppert takes on Van Barneveld. There is also the matter of Christian Kist v Luke Woodhouse in the latter stages.
Read also
Players Championship 26 Results
Last 16
Dave Chisnall (98.89) 6 | 5 (88.06) Ritchie Edhouse
Luke Humphries (99.68) 6 | 2 (99.19) Josh Rock
Christian Kist (99.11) 6 | 4 (94.31) Daryl Gurney
Luke Woodhouse (92.43) 6 | 4 (95.98) Wessel Nijman
ADVERTISEMENT
Raymond van Barneveld (104.36) 6 | 2 (101.78) Luke Littler
Danny Noppert (103.05) 6 | 5 (104.15) Damon Heta
Robert Owen (96.31) 6 | 1 (82.16) Rowby-John Rodriguez
Stephen Bunting (105.82) 6 | 4 (93.67) Radek Szaganski
Last 32
Dave Chisnall (101.02) 6 | 5 (98.09) Kim Huybrechts
Ritchie Edhouse (102.10) 6 | 3 (93.10) Michael Smith
ADVERTISEMENT
Josh Rock (93.67) 6 | 3 (82.88) Brendan Dolan
Luke Humphries (95.22) 6 | 4 (91.38) Connor Scutt
Christian Kist (87.58) 6 | 4 (81.48) Martijn Dragt
Daryl Gurney (100.60) 6 | 5 (96.86) Ryan Joyce
Luke Woodhouse (91.49) 6 | 5 (94.96) Andy Boulton
Wessel Nijman (100.53) 6 | 4 (102.55) Rob Cross
Luke Littler (100.15) 6 | 5 (88.19) Jamie Hughes
Raymond van Barneveld (99.10) 6 | 0 (82.72) Jeffrey De Zwaan
Damon Heta (98.23) 6 | 3 (100.35) Jermaine Wattimena
Danny Noppert (97.31) 6 | 3 (88.98) Jitse Van der Wal
Robert Owen (94.60) 6 | 4 (97.53) Martin Lukeman
Rowby-John Rodriguez (76.66) 6 | 4 (83.65) Mike De Decker
ADVERTISEMENT
Stephen Bunting (103.55) 6 | 1 (85.69) Josh Payne
Radek Szaganski (93.49) 6 | 5 (91.18) Lukas Wenig
Last 64
Kim Huybrechts (97.74) 6 | 4 (90.79) Ian White
Dave Chisnall (94.18) 6 | 3 (81.83) Thibault Tricole
Michael Smith (101.42) 6 | 1 (93.34) Dominik Gruellich
Ritchie Edhouse (92.51) 6 | 3 (84.70) Lee Cocks
Brendan Dolan (95.29) 6 | 4 (84.53) Rhys Griffin
Josh Rock (83.04) 6 | 4 (83.37) Danny Jansen
Connor Scutt (98.69) 6 | 2 (97.68) Gabriel Clemens
Luke Humphries (103.01) 6 | 5 (102.53) Callum Goffin
Christian Kist (90.66) 6 | 3 (88.84) Nathan Rafferty
ADVERTISEMENT
Martijn Dragt (93.05) 6 | 3 (94.13) Chris Dobey
Ryan Joyce (91.60) 6 | 2 (90.50) Matthew Dennant
Daryl Gurney (91.02) 6 | 5 (85.56) Tim Wolters
Luke Woodhouse (105.55) 6 | 3 (99.71) Ryan Meikle
Andy Boulton (95.96) 6 | 4 (95.26) Ryan Searle
Wessel Nijman (95.80) 6 | 3 (90.71) Keane Barry
Rob Cross (101.38) 6 | 1 (98.97) Dom Taylor
Jamie Hughes (89.45) 6 | 4 (81.07) Kevin Doets
Luke Littler (94.42) 6 | 3 (89.33) James Hurrell
Jeffrey De Zwaan (90.36) 6 | 4 (83.42) Scott Williams
Raymond van Barneveld (105.78) 6 | 1 (81.23) Mensur Suljovic
Jermaine Wattimena (109.98) 6 | 0 (87.73) Robert Grundy
Damon Heta (98.75) 6 | 5 (100.24) Nathan Aspinall
Jitse Van der Wal (87.53) 6 | 4 (89.90) Dylan Slevin
Danny Noppert (92.24) 6 | 2 (75.20) Geert Nentjes
Martin Lukeman (89.66) 6 | 1 (78.77) Nick Kenny
Robert Owen (91.01) 6 | 5 (99.09) Florian Hempel
Mike De Decker (110.65) 6 | 2 (88.95) Mario Vandenbogaerde
ADVERTISEMENT
Rowby-John Rodriguez (85.89) 6 | 0 (87.45) Ricardo Pietreczko
Josh Payne (91.26) 6 | 2 (86.12) Lee Evans
Stephen Bunting (89.81) 6 | 4 (89.77) Stefan Bellmont
Radek Szaganski (86.03) 6 | 4 (90.29) Stephen Burton
Lukas Wenig (96.10) 6 | 4 (89.47) Benjamin Reus
Last 128
Ian White (91.39) 6 | 3 (87.44) Dimitri Van den Bergh
Kim Huybrechts (101.34) 6 | 3 (92.45) Jimmy van Schie
ADVERTISEMENT
Dave Chisnall (104.03) 6 | 5 (97.25) Chris Landman
Thibault Tricole (89.33) 6 | 3 (92.89) Mervyn King
Michael Smith (100.26) 6 | 2 (91.66) Patrick Geeraets
Dominik Gruellich (91.76) 6 | 1 (80.04) Jelle Klaasen
Ritchie Edhouse (120.24) 6 | 0 (105.46) Graham Hall
ADVERTISEMENT
Lee Cocks (89.08) 6 | 3 (93.09) Maik Kuivenhoven
Brendan Dolan (87.79) 6 | 2 (86.20) Mickey Mansell
Rhys Griffin (90.09) 6 | 2 (90.56) Jeffrey De Graaf
Josh Rock (96.97) 6 | 2 (92.53) Krzysztof Ratajski
Danny Jansen (86.67) 6 | 2 (86.79) Graham Usher
Gabriel Clemens (104.47) 6 | 2 (97.46) Andy Baetens
Connor Scutt (105.24) 6 | 4 (94.77) Adam Hunt
Luke Humphries (100.20) 6 | 0 (88.61) George Killington
Callum Goffin (92.74) 6 | 5 (97.77) Ricky Evans
Nathan Rafferty (89.18) 6 | 3 (84.55) Alan Soutar
Christian Kist (85.69) 6 | 4 (81.19) Darren Beveridge
Chris Dobey (90.04) 6 | 3 (88.17) Keegan Brown
Martijn Dragt (92.28) 6 | 1 (86.47) Steve Lennon
Ryan Joyce (90.50) 6 | 3 (88.56) Simon Whitlock
Matthew Dennant (91.70) 6 | 3 (82.77) Boris Krcmar
Daryl Gurney (93.57) 6 | 1 (79.59) William Borland
Tim Wolters (84.07) 6 | 1 (78.81) Owen Bates
Luke Woodhouse (93.99) 6 | 5 (88.23) Adam Gawlas
Ryan Meikle (83.71) 6 | 3 (89.17) Reece Colley
Ryan Searle (98.02) 6 | 0 (75.33) Jurjen van der Velde
Andy Boulton (92.88) 6 | 2 (87.00) Stefaan Henderyck
Wessel Nijman (104.76) 6 | 2 (97.64) Jose De Sousa
Keane Barry (88.55) 6 | 3 (83.08) Steve Beaton
Rob Cross (105.15) 6 | 1 (89.23) Karel Sedlacek
Dom Taylor (96.65) 6 | 3 (96.09) Robbie Knops
Kevin Doets (91.54) 6 | 5 (95.03) Madars Razma
Jamie Hughes (86.21) 6 | 4 (87.42) Daniel Klose
Luke Littler (91.85) 6 | 4 (94.18) Danny Lauby
James Hurrell (98.15) 6 | 4 (100.22) Darryl Pilgrim
Scott Williams (102.42) 6 | 2 (89.46) Cameron Menzies
Jeffrey De Zwaan (78.64) 6 | 3 (78.53) Jules van Dongen
Raymond van Barneveld (92.97) 6 | 0 (78.56) William O'Connor
Mensur Suljovic (88.09) 6 | 3 (79.64) Danny van Trijp
Jermaine Wattimena (104.81) 6 | 2 (97.30) Adam Warner
Robert Grundy (86.01) 6 | 5 (83.74) Justin Hood
Damon Heta (98.42) 6 | 4 (97.26) Wesley Plaisier
Nathan Aspinall (99.79) 6 | 4 (95.79) Alexander Merkx
Jitse Van der Wal (91.90) 6 | 2 (88.49) Andrew Gilding
Dylan Slevin (89.73) 6 | 5 (89.05) Niels Zonneveld
Danny Noppert (107.81) 6 | 2 (97.26) Richard Veenstra
Geert Nentjes (85.55) 6 | 5 (84.17) Jeffrey Sparidaans
Martin Lukeman (96.37) 6 | 5 (91.90) Arron Monk
Nick Kenny (86.18) 6 | 3 (84.30) David Evans
Robert Owen (94.15) 6 | 3 (90.24) Ross Smith
Florian Hempel (92.15) 6 | 3 (80.64) Rene Eidams
Mike De Decker (93.00) 6 | 3 (87.11) Vincent van der Voort
Mario Vandenbogaerde (99.03) 6 | 1 (93.12) Brett Claydon
Ricardo Pietreczko (93.09) 6 | 3 (86.57) Berry van Peer
Rowby-John Rodriguez (82.29) 6 | 2 (75.26) Christian Perez
Lee Evans (102.69) 6 | 2 (101.54) Dirk van Duijvenbode
Josh Payne (83.65) 6 | 2 (81.78) Owen Roelofs
Stephen Bunting (91.26) 6 | 1 (77.52) Joshua Richardson
Stefan Bellmont (95.47) 6 | 5 (91.32) Matt Campbell
Stephen Burton (83.57) 6 | 1 (84.88) Joe Cullen
Radek Szaganski (91.12) 6 | 4 (90.00) Cam Crabtree
Lukas Wenig (97.70) 6 | 2 (95.08) Gian van Veen
Benjamin Reus (88.39) 6 | 5 (93.89) Richie Burnett
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026