"Raymond talks a lot of crap in his life before": Michael van Gerwen rubbishes Van Barneveld Beau Greaves Premier League comments
PDCMichael van Gerwen praised Beau Greaves as “the best female darts player ever” after overcoming the multiple Women's World Champion in his opening match at the 2025 Grand Slam of Darts — but warned against rushing her into the Premier League spotlight amid comments by Raymond van Barneveld last week.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Dutchman came through a tense opener against Greaves in Wolverhampton, admitting the build-up had been fuelled by hype surrounding the 21-year-old’s debut on one of the sport’s biggest stages.
“It was a tough game,” Van Gerwen said post match. “Everyone puts so much pressure on matches like this, and we all know that. Beau’s been in great form lately, she’s doing really well, and playing games like this doesn’t make it any easier.
“I think the sharpness was there, everything was there, but at some points I was giving her too many chances. If you really want to be dominant, you need to finish — especially that first leg. Then you can get into your own rhythm and confidence. But when you make things difficult for yourself, it gets harder and harder.”
Follow the Grand Slam of Darts via our live scores!
Follow the Grand Slam of Darts via our live scores!
Read also
Respect for Greaves’ rise
Greaves’ performance once again caught the attention of pundits, following her impressive form across the Women’s Series and recent televised appearances. Van Gerwen, who was occasionally cast as the “pantomime villain” by a crowd heavily supporting Greaves, said he understood why she’s being talked about so much.
“Yes, because if you look at her talent and what she’s achieved so far, in my opinion there’s never been a better woman darts player,” he said. “Fair play to her. But now she also needs to push herself to the next barrier. She’s done it a few times a year, but now she has to do it regularly, weekly and that’s going to be different as well.”
ADVERTISEMENT
With Greaves set to join the PDC Tour full-time next season, Van Gerwen believes her biggest challenge will be adapting to the demands of the circuit. “Definitely, don’t get me wrong, but it’s a man’s world,” he said. “Of course we’ve had Anastasia [Dobromyslova] and Lisa [Ashton] on tour before, but Beau’s still young. What it’s going to do to her, we don’t know — but it’s not up to me.
“I’ve got enough problems myself making sure I play well, and if I start worrying about others, it’ll only get worse for me.”
“Raymond talks a lot of crap" - Van Barneveld comments rubbished.
Van Gerwen was also asked about recent comments from Raymond van Barneveld, who suggested Greaves could be a Premier League contender if she performs well at the World Championship. Van Gerwen smiled but was typically blunt in his response.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Raymond talks a lot of crap in his life before as well, you know what I mean?” he joked. “It would be too soon. Of course she has the talent to do it, but first let her adapt to the tour before talking about the Premier League. The Premier League has killed some players before too.”
Read also
Handling the pressure
While Greaves was the story going in, Van Gerwen admitted the hype added a layer of pressure for both players. “They hyped her up so much, probably even distracted her a bit, but that’s how it is,” he said. “I’ve been on the circuit a while, so I know how to deal with it and try not to let it get to me. Of course, it’s nice when the crowd chants for you, but it is what it is.”
Asked if he felt disrespected by the pre-match talk of Greaves being the favourite, Van Gerwen shrugged: “Let them say it. It’s not up to me to decide who’s favourite. I can only try to do as well as possible for myself.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Relief and reflection
The Dutchman admitted the opening win was an important first step in what he described as “a brutal group,” which also features Niko Springer and Gary Anderson. “It’s very important — now they have to chase me,” he said. “But it doesn’t get any easier. Niko Springer next and then Gary Anderson, so it’s a tough group.
“I could’ve had an easier one, but I’m not walking away from it. You have to face it, put your shoulder underneath it, and make sure you do the right thing for yourself. Never give up — you have to battle your games, that’s how it is.”
At 4–2 up against Greaves, Van Gerwen said he briefly thought the match was under control before she fought back. “You know she’s capable of everything,” he said. “She was really stable — most of the time there was a treble in there. I was probably putting more pressure on myself, thinking, ‘Come on, Mike, why are you doing this to yourself?’ That’s darts sometimes. But it is what it is — I won the first one, it gives me confidence for tomorrow night, and I’m looking forward to it.”
Eyes on a fourth Grand Slam crown
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Gerwen, chasing his fourth Grand Slam title and first since 2017, said the win gives him confidence to build momentum in Wolverhampton. “It would mean a lot to me,” he said. “But first let me get through the group, and then we can worry about the rest.”
Despite not qualifying for the Players Championship Finals later this month, the Dutchman doesn’t expect a long break before the World Championship at Alexandra Palace. “I don’t really have much of a break — two, maybe two and a half days,” he smiled. “Friday evening until Sunday evening, so maybe 48 hours more rest. I’m still quite a busy man, but I just have to do the right things for myself. This is one of the biggest tournaments of the year, so I need to make sure I’m performing.”
The bigger picture
Van Gerwen’s respect for Greaves came through clearly — both his praise and his realism. While he called her the best female player ever, his words carried the perspective of experience.
“She’s got everything,” he said, “but now she has to prove she can do it every week. That’s when you find out what kind of player you really are.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026





