Schedule PDC World Darts Championship 2025 Monday afternoon including Dobey v Doets, Aspinall v Pietreczko and Rydz
PDC
The last darts day of the year is upon us. We have six more matches from the fourth round at the 2025 PDC World Darts Championship on the schedule on Monday, three of which will be played in the afternoon session.
ADVERTISEMENT
The winners of the fourth round may return in the new year for the continuation of the World Darts Championship on New Year's Day. The fourth round will be played over a format of best of 7 sets.
Read also
Kevin Doets v Chris Dobey
What a great tournament Kevin Doets has already had and it can get even better for 'Hawkeye'. The Dutchman, who lives in Sweden, started his tournament with a difficult 3-1 victory over Noa-Lynn van Leuven, but then managed to get rid of Michael Smith (3-2) and Krzysztof Ratajski (4-3). Against Ratajski, Doets got off to a good start, though, as the Pole missed four match darts to knock Doets out of the tournament. Because of his good performance in Alexandra Palace, Doets has already moved up ten spots in the virtual world rankings. He started the World Darts Championship as number 51 in the world and is now ranked 41st. By the way, he will remain there if Doets manages to win from Dobey.
Chris Dobey was responsible for the elimination of Alexander Merkx in the second round. In that match 'Hollywood' easily took a 2-0 lead, after which he let go of the reins a bit. This allowed Merkx to take a set and eventually made it 3-1 in sets for the Englishman. Then Dobey was too strong 4-2 in sets for Josh Rock. It is the sixth time in the seven years that Dobey has reached the last sixteen in London, and at the 2023 and 2024 editions the former Masters champion even made it to the quarter-finals.
It will be the fourth time Doets and Dobey will meet in an official match. In 2022, Doets won the first showdown 6-1, but the last two duels were won by Dobey. Also by large numbers; 6-0 and 6-2.
Robert Owen v Callan Rydz
Originally not even qualified for the World Darts Championship, and now in the fourth round. Robert Owen is experiencing a special month, in which he was added to the tournament as a participant at the last minute after Dom Taylor tested positive in a doping test. This gave Owen an extreme chance to save his Tour Card, and he has since succeeded after wins over Niels Zonneveld (3-1), Gabriel Clemens (3-1) and Ricky Evans (4-2).
ADVERTISEMENT
Callan Rydz is another big surprise this tournament. The Englishman was already in the quarterfinals once at the 2022 World Darts Championship, but then actually had two very bad seasons. Neither season was very positive, but in recent weeks Rydz has mentally got it back on track. And then "The Riot" is capable of great things. In his first round against Romeo Grbavac (3-0), he recorded an average of 107. After Martin Schindler was swept away 3-0 in sets, he also did not concede a set against Dimitri van den Bergh (4-0) and Rydz reached a moyenne of 105.
The only previous meeting between these two players was won by Rydz. They met in 2023 at a Players Championship tournament. Then Rydz pulled out the win 6-4.
Can Callan Rydz reach the quarter-finals of the World Darts Championship for the second time in his career?
Ricardo Pietreczko v Nathan Aspinall
An interesting bill to end the afternoon with. Can Ricardo Pietreczko become the second German ever to qualify for the last eight at the World Darts Championship? 'Pikachu' could then follow in the footsteps of Gabriel Clemens, who managed this two editions ago. Pietreczko has already had a strong tournament, winning on his way to the last sixteen over Xiaochen Zong (3-0), Gian van Veen (3-1) and Scott Williams (4-1).
Given Nathan Aspinall's form, another win is certainly a possibility. The Asp' recorded victories over Leonard Gates (3-1) and Andrew Gilding (4-0). It was not all very convincing, although Aspinall was strong on the doubles, which is normally also Pietreczko's specialty. Aspinall can reach the last eight at the World Darts Championship for the first time since the 2020 edition. Perhaps this performance would also help him get an invitation to the Premier League, which Aspinall would love to compete in in 2025.
ADVERTISEMENT
It will be only the second showdown between Aspinall and Pietreczko. The previous one was also televised. In 2023, they met at the Grand Slam of Darts. Then it was Pietreczko who managed a 5-4 victory over the two-time major winner.
TV Guide during World Darts Championship
Sky Sports are broadcasting the entire World Darts Championship in the UK with coverage throughout on a dedicated channel Sky Sports Darts.
A subscription is required to access this though which can be sought on a Sky box or through their streaming platform.
Prize money
ADVERTISEMENT
The 96 participants at the 2025 World Darts Championship may divide as much as 2.5 million pounds between them. That amount is almost forty times higher than at the very first edition of the PDC Worlds in 1994.
The 64 participants to start in the first round of the World Darts Championship will receive £7500 in prize money anyway. The top-32 of the seeding list are guaranteed 15,000 pounds. These players enter the World Darts Championship from the second round. The amount then increases further each round. The new world champion will receive the top prize of 500,000 pounds.
Format
First round: Best of 5 sets
Second round: Best of 5 sets
Third round: Best of 7 sets
Fourth round: Best of 7 sets
Quarterfinals: Best of 9 sets
Semifinals: Best of 11 sets
Final: Best of 13 sets
In the first round, there will be no tiebreak if it is 2-2 after four legs in the fifth set. In that case, the fifth leg will be sudden-death. Starting from the second round, a tie-break rule will be applied in all matches; a deciding set must be won with a difference of two legs. If the score in the final set becomes 5-5, a sudden-death leg will still be played.
PDC World Darts Championship 2025 Schedule
ADVERTISEMENT
Monday, Dec. 30
Afternoon session (from 12:30 p.m.)
Fourth round
Kevin Doets v Chris Dobey
Robert Owen v Callan Rydz
Ricardo Pietreczko v Nathan Aspinall

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






