“Someone reported me. Because they knew they couldn't beat me on the dartboard" - Dennis Priestley recalls time he was almost kicked out of competition
PDC
Dennis Priestley ranks among the greats in darts history. The two-time world champion, however, did not follow an obvious path to the top. He only started taking darts seriously in his mid-twenties and then needed years to break through to the England team via the county circuit. In an extensive interview, “Dennis the Menace” looks back on his first arrows, his distinctive throw, criticism of his slow pace of play, and the historic split that ultimately led to the creation of the PDC.
ADVERTISEMENT
Priestley has been enjoying retirement for several years now. The Englishman no longer even plays exhibition matches. In fact, his darts have not come out of the case for quite some time.
“November of this year, it'll be five years since I did my last exhibition, and I haven't picked them up since,” he told the Tops & Tales podcast hosted by referee Huw Ware.
That closes a remarkable chapter. Priestley was active for decades and witnessed firsthand how darts evolved from a traditional pub game into a professional TV sport. His own introduction to the sport came relatively late.
Winning bet delivered first tungsten darts
Priestley was in his mid-twenties when darts began to play a more serious role in his life. Remarkably, his first set of tungsten darts came thanks to a winning bet on the horse races.
“had a bet on the 1975 Derby and Grundy won it. Pat Eddery was the jockey. And I had £6 on it at 11-2, so that won me 33 quid, and I bought my first set of tungsten darts from there.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Before that, Priestley was already throwing weekly with brass darts. That also happened under conditions quite different from modern darts. He played on a Yorkshire board, which has no trebles.
“Before, well, I was playing with brass darts just once a week on a Monday on a Yorkshire board, which is doubles only, no trebles, and we stood nine inches closer to the board.”
Priestley then experienced changes to the throwing distance as well. He recalls, for instance, the World Championship finals between Leighton Rees and John Lowe at the end of the 1970s. Players constantly had to adapt to different distances.
“We got used to seven foot six. You know, you'd find your darts not quite getting there, so you got to adjust. And after time, you do. It's the same with moving—we were playing seven foot nine when the news at World were reinvented, and that was eight foot. So, you know, you got used to it."
Dennis Priestley became the first PDC world champion
ADVERTISEMENT
Unique grip became his trademark
Anyone who watched Priestley in his prime will instantly recognise his distinctive style. He took his time before the first dart and also had a unique grip. The point of his dart actually rested on his finger before he threw.
“So the point was on me. And at some stage, I moved from having it resting on my nail there, but then somewhere along the line, I started resting it on my finger.”
That ultimately proved part of an important development in his game. Priestley discovered that in his early years he used different throwing methods. Only when he chose one fixed technique did his level rise consistently.
“I found in the early years, in the late '70s, I could play two or three different ways. And once I sussed out that I'd got to stick to that one way, what was the best for me, and concentrated on playing that one way instead of different ways, I'd become more consistent.”
ADVERTISEMENT
His striking grip also had a downside. Priestley could not play with particularly long points. Those longer points are now popular with players like Luke Littler and Luke Humphries, as they can create more room in the scoring bed.
“I always said about long points, such an advantage—this is going back into the '80s—but I couldn't have the long point because I had the point of the dart on my finger. So the length of my point had to be quite short.”
Read also
Criticism of slow tempo irritated Priestley
It wasn’t just his grip that made Priestley recognisable. His pace of play was also a talking point for years. Especially before his first dart, the Englishman took his time. Commentators regularly highlighted it, and that could really annoy Priestley.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Getting that first dart ready. I've always said—in fact, I got fed up of commentators and TV people saying, "Oh, it takes 17 seconds." Well, Phil Taylor was 15 seconds. I mean, a couple of seconds amongst friends is nothing, is it? You know what I mean? In fact, I got fed up of listening to it at one point. It used to annoy me."
According to Priestley, a false impression arose because it was mainly his preparation for the first dart that was slow. Once that first arrow was in, the other two followed much faster.
“Once I got my stance right and got my arm up and stopped it shaking, my hand shaking, my first dart—let my first dart go. And if it was where I wanted it to be, the other two were just as fast as any other player..”
His pace only really slowed once Priestley started appearing on television. That had everything to do with the pressure he put on himself.
“Once I got on TV, I think I did become a couple of seconds slower because I wanted to be successful. I didn't want to make a fool of myself being on TV. So I took that little bit more time and obviously it worked.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Van der Voort struggled with Priestley’s pace
Priestley’s measured style sometimes clashed with that of his opponents. Fast throwers in particular could find it hard to keep their own rhythm. Vincent van der Voort is cited by Priestley as an example.
“Well, obviously the speedsters would have found it quite difficult playing against me. Vincent van der Voort was very fast. He always found it very hard to play against me.”
Conversely, Priestley had to be careful not to get dragged into his opponent’s tempo. That even happened to him once against Michael van Gerwen.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I just knew that I had to go at my own pace when I was playing faster players. Sometimes they can hurry you on. And I noticed it a couple of times. Once when I was playing Michael van Gerwen, I thought, "I'm out of breath here, going back." He's rushing me too much. So, you know, I played at my pace."
Despite all the comments about his speed, Priestley can’t recall opponents complaining to him directly about it. However, someone once tried to get him thrown out of a tournament in a very different way.
Opponent tried to get Priestley thrown out of a tournament over shoes
At an event in Oldham, strict dress codes applied according to Priestley. Players had to wear black trousers and smart black shoes. Priestley turned up in all-black Reebok sneakers. That proved sufficient reason for someone to file a complaint.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Someone reported me. Because they knew they couldn't beat me on the dartboard, so they wanted me thrown out of the competition because I got the wrong footwear.”
With the current eye-catching outfits of some pros in mind, Priestley can laugh about it now. “Just imagine that nowadays with Peter Wright and players like that.”
Years-long road to the world elite
Priestley’s career didn’t take off overnight. Whereas modern talents sometimes progress from the Development Tour to major PDC stages within months, Priestley says it took him seven or eight years to climb from local darts to the international elite.
“Probably something in the region of seven or eight years. You know, I got picked for Yorkshire, I think it was '83. Then it was probably five years before I gradually made it into, or became good enough to play for England."
Read also
Priestley eventually even rose to world number one. In the early nineties he was among the absolute elite and, moreover, he was set to become England captain in 1993.
That was precisely when darts underwent its historic split. Priestley was among the players who broke away from the existing darts body, a development that ultimately led to what is now the PDC.
That choice had major personal consequences for Priestley. His planned spell as England captain did not go ahead. “I mean, that was one of the things with the split. I was due to be the captain for 1993, that full year, and I never got the honour.”
Looking back, Priestley realises how much he put on the line at that moment. He had just reached the very top and held a position many players try to secure throughout their careers.
“I mean, I could be down in the mouth about that particular time. I had probably the most to lose out of all the 16 that broke away. I was world number one at the time. I got picked to be England captain, you know, and never got a chance to do any of them."

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







