"That's pure arrogance. They feel no need to inform organizers" - Surprise at PDC's lack of communication
PDCA day after the Formula 1 race in Zandvoort, Damian Vlottes and Vincent van der Voort took their place behind the microphone again for a new episode of Darts Draait Door. The conversation quickly moved from Formula 1 to the Euro Tour in Antwerp, where Dutch and Belgian top players showed varying performances. Also discussed were the poor communication of the PDC and the place of Raymond van Barneveld within the current darts circuit.
ADVERTISEMENT
Both men kicked off the episode with their experiences at the Dutch Grand Prix. Van der Voort was present all day and saw how large-scale and professional the event was organized. "It really is a great spectacle all around of course," he said. "And I'm not even talking about the racing, but the whole event around it. If you've never been there, you can't explain how busy it is."
Vlottes concurred, and the comparison to darts was quickly made. "In darts, of course, we also had Raymond van Barneveld. Ahoy came about because of him and Van Gerwen. At Zandvoort you see that one man, Max Verstappen, lifts an entire sporting event to another level," Van der Voort said.
Noppert and the curse of evening sessions
Soon the conversation shifted to the Flanders Darts Trophy in Antwerp, where Danny Noppert again struggled in an evening session. "Once that evening session comes around, it's all over," Van der Voort stated critically. "Maybe he should start thinking out of the box, because the way it's going now it's not working."
Read also
Vlottes, who observed Noppert in the practice room, saw no signs of fatigue: "He didn't make a tired impression at all. He is physically perhaps the fittest of them all." Still, the performance lagged.
This is in stark contrast to Luke Littler, who proved unflappable despite his youth: "He can just turn himself on and off. We've never seen that before" Van der Voort said.
ADVERTISEMENT
James Wade's name also came up. The Englishman made it to another semifinal without playing great. "If anyone can win ugly, it's James Wade," laughed Van der Voort. "Who doesn't get above 90 average the whole tournament, but in the semifinals he suddenly throws 99. He always does exactly what it takes."
Belgian fracas: Huybrechts and De Decker
The Belgian darts weekend also produced some controversy. Kim Huybrechts expressed his frustration towards the darts media and Mike De Decker also resumed an old quarrel from more than ten years ago. Van der Voort frowned: "That you are still doing that after twelve years ... then your career will be very long. Kim also has to look in the mirror. If there are always incidents, maybe it's not just because of others."
According to Vlottes, Huybrechts would have been better off sending a quiet message to correct factual errors, instead of publicly blowing things up: "Then everyone wouldn't have jumped on it either."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
The final in Antwerp was again won by Luke Littler, although Josh Rock gave him a hard time. At 7-6 Rock threw a sensational 161-finish to force a last leg decider, but Littler finally decided the match with an 11-darter. "Rock can blame himself," Van der Voort analyzed. "If you get to start, you have to make sure you at least force him to that 12-darter. Now it was too easy."
Still, there was praise for the Northern Irishman: "He stayed very calm, even when his opponent made a show of it. You can see he is making strides," thought 'The Dutch Destroyer'.
They also expressed their frustration with the communication from the PDC and Sky Sports. For example, the withdrawal of Luke Humphries was only announced when the draw was already known. "That is pure arrogance from the PDC," Van der Voort stated. "They don't feel they have to inform organizers. You hear the same from Sky toward Viaplay: they throw in breaks or move matches around without saying anything."
Van Barneveld not the same
Finally, Raymond van Barneveld's name also came up on the broadcast. The five-time world champion remains a crowd pleaser and managed to reach the second round in Antwerp. There he seemed to be on his way to a fine victory over Ryan Searle. With a 5-3 lead, Van Barneveld had everything in his own hands, but things still went wrong. "From 5-3 on Searle just threw really well," Van der Voort analyzed. "But this is exactly where Raymond is now in his career. He can still do it, but the constancy is missing."
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Vlottes, Van Barneveld lacked the ability to find an extra gear in the decisive phase: "With Littler you see that at 7-7 he throws everything into the battle. With Raymond, that is missing now. That's just the difference."
Whereas he used to be rock solid precisely in the closing stages, that coolness seems to be slowly disappearing. "He can still win games from the best, he has proven that in recent years. Only he doesn't do it week in and week out," Van der Voort concluded.
Read also
The discussion quickly turned to the question of what Van Barneveld still has to offer in today's darts world. With 57 years on the clock, he remains a phenomenon, but the level difference with the new generation is growing. "You see technically he still has one of the most beautiful throws. But it's about whether you can bring that five, six games in a row. And he just doesn't manage to do that anymore," Vlottes stated.
Van der Voort responded, "Look, he doesn't have to prove himself anywhere anymore. His legacy stands. But if you still want to compete at the top of this field, you have to be almost flawless. And at his age, that's an almost impossible task."
ADVERTISEMENT
However, 'Barney' will always have the undiminished support of the public. Whether in the Netherlands, Belgium or England: loud applause and cheers for the Dutchman can still be heard everywhere. According to Vlottes, that also makes him unique: "With Raymond, you see that darts is not only about performance, but also about emotion and perception. Fans just still want to see him play."
Still, the conclusion was clear. Van Barneveld can still shock on a good day, but the times when he made structural finals are probably behind him. "It's actually admirable that he can still do this at his age," Van der Voort concluded. "But the difference with the absolute top is that he can't force those last few percent anymore. And that's the difference between winning and losing."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







