Jurjen van der Velde has voiced criticism of the current PDC
Q-School system. The Dutchman understands that the tournament offers players a huge opportunity to secure a
PDC Tour Card, but also believes that one good week currently carries too much weight. According to Van der Velde, future formats should take performances over a longer period more into account.
Van der Velde was allowed to enter the most recent Q-School at the Final Stage. That was a key advantage for the Dutchman, as it meant he could skip the first three grueling days of the First Stage.
"Yeah, it's a very hard week because I can start in the final stage because I was playing well in the last few years, so last few months, so that's why I could start in the final stage," said Van der Velde as per Oche.
The gap between the different phases of Q-School is significant. The Final Stage still features 128 players at the start, while during the first three days more than five hundred darters try to qualify for the decisive phase. For Van der Velde, that underscores how fierce the competition is.
"And yeah, it's very hard. In the final stage, there are still 128 players, but in the first three days, there are over 500 or something. But yeah, there are a lot of players and it's very hard and very long days. So yeah, I think for me, it's better than to start in the final stage."
Little certainty
According to Van der Velde, it is striking that results over a full season provide relatively little certainty. "I think it's still a strange system because it's only a week of darts. And if you're playing a whole year good and you're fifth on the Challenge Tour ranking and you're not securing a
Tour Card for the next two years, and you're playing one week fantastic, and then you can have a Tour Card. So yeah, maybe they can change something in the future."
That touches on a debate that has been ongoing within darts. Q-School is designed as a gateway to the professional circuit, but the system can result in a player who performs consistently over an entire season being overtaken by someone who delivers an exceptional week at exactly the right moment.
Van der Velde therefore sees room for adjustments. He does not think it is necessary to immediately hand out a large number of extra Tour Cards via the
Challenge Tour or Development Tour, but does believe that consistency should be rewarded more.
"There's now only the three spots on the Dev Tour, two or three spots. So yeah, maybe it's not directly 10 spots, but yeah, maybe they can do it a bit more so because the youth darts is also growing and growing.
The Dutchman points to the development of young players. According to him, several talents are already showing they can handle the level of the PDC ProTour. "And you see with Mitchell Lawrie and some other youth players, they are very good. And if they are playing like that, they are good enough to be on the tour."
Clear difference
That is precisely why Van der Velde believes there should be a careful look at which players truly aspire to a professional career. He sees a clear difference between players who have one good week at Q-School and those who have been showing for some time that they seriously want to build a career at the highest level.
"But yeah, just like I said, when you're playing one week very good on the Q School, there are also a few people from Germany, they are playing one week on the Q School and they're never playing on the tour because they don't have a plan or something."
Jurjen van der Velde holds a PDC Tour Card
Huge investment
Van der Velde considers the latter an important point. A Tour Card not only brings the chance to play on the PDC circuit, but also requires a huge investment of time, money, and energy. Traveling to tournaments, accommodation costs, and playing dozens of matches per season present a major challenge. According to Van der Velde, a Tour Card should ideally go to someone who genuinely plans to seize that opportunity.
"Or maybe they have some other reasons. But yeah, give the spots to players who want to be on the tour," he concluded. With that, Van der Velde is not so much calling for Q-School to be scrapped entirely, but rather for a system in which performances over a longer period carry more weight.
Van der Velde’s remarks at the same time illustrate the dilemma the PDC faces. Q-School must remain accessible to new players, as it is precisely there that unknown talents can present themselves and break through in a short time. At the same time, there is a risk that established players or darters who perform strongly over a whole season miss out on a Tour Card due to a poor week at Q-School.