"They know now that I’m not going to go away quietly": Luke Humphries returns to second home of Leeds with sights set on hat-trick and play-off fight
PDCLuke Humphries returns to the First Direct Arena in Leeds as he aims to claim a third consecutive nightly win at the arena winning in 2024 and 2025 in this year's Premier League Darts.
ADVERTISEMENT
A nightly win would go a long way with Humphries one of just a few players who have yet to win a night and given he supports Leeds, it is always a night that lives long in the memory.
He faces Josh Rock after a good week in Aberdeen last time out and already knows in his mind the permutations for him to qualify. "It’s always going to be the one I look forward to most on the calendar. I put myself in a better position last week, so I played a bit better and I don’t have to win tomorrow to stand a chance now," said Humphries during his pre Leeds press conference.
“If I win my first round tomorrow and then win my next round in Birmingham, I could still have a chance of finishing fourth versus fifth for a straight knockout. Those are the scenarios that can happen. So it’s not a must-win for me overall. The first game probably is, but yeah, it’s always the one I look forward to the most.”
Read also
Aberdeen run and all-or-nothing mindset
He comes into this week off the back of reaching the final in Aberdeen beating Michael van Gerwen and Gian van Veen en route and said that was massive for his confidence. "It was huge. If I won, I stayed in with a chance of qualifying. If I lost, it was probably over for me.
“I think seven points is catchable, but you’re really staring down the barrel at that stage. So it was a must-win game. I said that in my pre-match interview and thankfully I won.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Beating Gian as well was important because he’s right there with me too. It’s a shame I didn’t have a good last few legs against Luke Littler in the final because if I did, I’d have been right on the tails of Michael or Gezzy, only three points behind them.
“But it is what it is. It was an important three points for myself and hopefully I can build on it tomorrow.”
Having that all-or-nothing mindset, though, like a knockout tournament, has also made Humphries focus on the task in hand a bit more, he admits, albeit while still tinkering with his game, as has been seen to try and eventually get a perceived edge. "I think it mentally makes you focus harder. You know you can’t mess around and think, ‘I’ll be better next week,’ because that’s not the case anymore.
“Every week now feels so important, and I think that benefits me a little bit. You’ve seen with the way I changed my throw recently, I slowed it down a little bit to make it more controlled. I probably wouldn’t usually do something like that if there were another eight or nine weeks left, but because it’s crunch time, I wanted to improve the stability of it.”

Luke Humphries returns to his second home of Leeds.
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries was also pragmatic when it came to his thoughts on whether people have been harsh on his game this year and his form going into the back end of the Premier League.
“I don’t know. Everyone’s entitled to their opinion. That’s sport, and the pundits can say what they feel and what they see. No one’s really wrong because going 12 or 13 weeks without winning a nightly event isn’t up to my standards.
“But the strange thing is I’ve probably performed better this year than I did last year in terms of averages and scoring. It’s pretty obvious why I am where I am — it’s my doubles and my timing that have let me down.
“That’s probably been one of the strongest parts of my game over the last two or two-and-a-half years. If that comes back to how it usually is and the scoring stays where it is, then you’ll see me back to normal. To be fair, last week the doubling was pretty decent, and the scoring was good, and you saw a much more consistent week from me.”
Returning to Leeds
ADVERTISEMENT
Being a Leeds United supporter, Leeds always means a lot to him as a night and he hopes to combat needing to win more than ever with that home feeling. “Of course it can. It gives you that extra buzz and a bit of a spur on. There’s added pressure when you’re playing in front of a crowd that’s naturally more behind you because you want to win more than ever — and I need to win more than ever, to be fair.
“The last two years I’ve probably performed to the standard I wanted to there, so hopefully tomorrow it pays dividends again. Doing the hat-trick would be quite surreal, but it’s definitely possible.”
“When you’ve got that buzz and adrenaline flowing through you, it can spur you on and make you even better than you naturally are. The last two times I’ve played there, the crowd has really helped push me on. Some of the games were a bit of a scrap, but I desperately didn’t want to lose. I think that mentality is sometimes what you need and it’s going to help me tomorrow. It’s going to be a tough game against Josh Rock because he’s starting to play better and find his feet a bit more now. He’ll be up for it, I’ll be up for it, and there’s a lot on the line for me.”
Read also
But for Humphries now too it's about remaining positive and really digging in after admitting he doubted himself throughout the campaign and now employs a mindset of trying to dig in to try and get there and if it happens great. “Sometimes it makes you feel like it’s just not going to be your year or your tournament.
ADVERTISEMENT
“For me, the doubles have really killed me. There are so many games I look back on and feel like I should have won. But if the doubles click over the next few weeks, I’ve still got a chance to lift the trophy and that’s the most important thing. When results aren’t going your way, it’s hard to keep your confidence and motivation up. The last two years in the Premier League were all about winning and making finals all the time, so when that stops happening it’s a new experience. You have to dig in and see what you’re really made of. If I do manage to qualify, I’d be really proud of myself because it would show I found something special at the right time.”
Being a seasoned pro by now, Humphries said that others will also be handling the pressure well even Van Veen in his debut year but that he is not going to go away quietly and hopes to get himself in a late position for that play-off push. "When you’ve been a professional for a long time, you get used to these situations. Michael van Gerwen won’t be worrying too much, he’ll quietly back himself to get the job done. I’m the same, and I’m sure Gian will feel the same too. But they know now that I’m not going to go away quietly. I’m going to keep pushing and trying to get myself into that top four.
“If Michael can’t win one of his next two games and me and Gian win our opening matches, then we could end up in a decider in Sheffield. That’s all I ask of myself really — get into a one-game shootout situation for fourth or fifth. That would suit me perfectly because at least then I’ve given myself a real opportunity.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





