Preview Premier League Darts 2026 Night 14 in Leeds: Table topper Littler takes on van Gerwen as Clayton and Price clash in all-Welsh tie
PDC
The climax of the Premier League Darts 2026 is getting ever closer. Thursday brings night fourteen, with tension rising as the play-offs come into view. Two of the four tickets for finals night have already been claimed, but the fight for the remaining places is still wide open.
ADVERTISEMENT
This week the elite field lands in Leeds, a city that Luke Humphries calls home. The world number two can bank on massive crowd support, not least because of his ties to local football club Leeds United. His walk-on song, I Predict a Riot, dovetails perfectly with that and is seen as a familiar anthem among the fans.
Leeds has been on the Premier League calendar since 2014 and is therefore one of the relatively recent additions. Of the current line-up, Michael van Gerwen is the only player who was there at the time and, twelve years on, is still taking to the stage at the First Direct Arena.
Recent history in Leeds has produced various nightly winners. In 2022, Van Gerwen came out on top, albeit via a slightly unusual route. After Gary Anderson withdrew, he advanced straight to the semi-final, where he beat Peter Wright 6-3. He was then clearly too strong for James Wade in the final: 6-1.
A year later it was Michael Smith who dominated the night. The Englishman produced convincing darts and saw off Chris Dobey (6-1), Wright again (6-2) and Gerwyn Price (6-4) to secure the nightly title.
Read also
The past two editions have been all about Humphries. In 2024 he made full use of home advantage by defeating Rob Cross (6-1), Smith (6-1) and Van Gerwen (6-5). He proved untouchable in front of his own crowd again in 2025. With wins over Van Gerwen (6-4), Stephen Bunting (6-4) and Luke Littler (6-5), he once more made the night his own.
Luke Humphries has been unbeaten in Leeds for two years
ADVERTISEMENT
Results and schedule Premier League Darts 2026
Thursday 05/07 (from 7:00 PM)
First Direct Arena, Leeds- Night 14
| Time | Player 1 | Score | Player 2 | Round |
| 8:15 PM | Gerwyn Price | Jonny Clayton | QF | |
| 8:45 PM | Luke Littler | Michael van Gerwen | QF | |
| 9:15 PM | Josh Rock | Luke Humphries | QF | |
| 9:45 PM | Gian van Veen | Stephen Bunting | QF | |
| 10:15 PM | Winner QF1 | Winner QF2 | SF | |
| 10:45 PM | Winner QF3 | Winner QF4 | SF | |
| 11:15 PM | Winner SF1 | Winner SF2 | FINAL |
Gerwyn Price v Jonny Clayton
ADVERTISEMENT
The night in Leeds opens with an all-Welsh clash between Gerwyn Price and Jonny Clayton. The latter is already assured of a top-four spot and is locked in a battle with Luke Littler for first place in the table. Clayton dropped costly points in Aberdeen last week, which saw him surrender top spot to Littler.
Price ground out a hard-fought 6-5 win over Stephen Bunting last week, finally putting two points on the board again after three straight defeats. “The Iceman” currently sits third on 21 points, but needs to keep picking up results to hold his place in the top four. A win over Clayton would take Price another step closer to the O2 Arena.
This will be the 43rd PDC meeting between Price and Clayton. The stats are heavily in Price’s favour, with thirty wins over his compatriot. He has especially excelled against Clayton of late, as Price has beaten “The Ferret” twelve times in their last thirteen head-to-heads.
Gerwyn Price has an excellent head-to-head record against Jonny Clayton
Luke Littler v Michael van Gerwen
ADVERTISEMENT
Luke Littler has reclaimed top spot in the Premier League Darts. After week eight, Littler led the table for the first time, but after week ten “The Nuke” had to hand first place back to Jonny Clayton. Thanks to back-to-back nightly wins, and five in total, Littler is back on top with 34 points. The English teenager can still chase two records over the next three nights. Last year he won six nightly titles and amassed 45 points during the league phase. Two nightly wins and one extra victory on the other night would be enough to better both marks.
Read also
Michael van Gerwen does not need to worry about records for now, as the Vlijmen ace must first make sure he reaches the play-offs. “Mighty Mike” has been sitting fourth for almost two months, but the pack has closed in. He also faces a tough run-in at the end of this campaign. The seven-time Premier League champion needs points, with Gian van Veen and Luke Humphries breathing down his neck.
In the meantime, Littler has built a comfortable record against his Dutch rival. Littler has come out on top sixteen times against Van Gerwen, compared to ten wins for “MVG.” The last three meetings all went to Littler, though twice by 6-5 and once by 6-4.
Michael van Gerwen badly needs the points against Luke Littler
ADVERTISEMENT
Josh Rock v Luke Humphries
Luke Humphries grabbed his last lifeline last week to stay in the hunt for the playoffs. In the quarterfinals he beat rival Michael van Gerwen, and ultimately “Cool Hand Luke” reached the final. Luke Littler denied him the nightly title, but Humphries still took three points back from Aberdeen. The deficit to Gian van Veen has been completely erased, while Van Gerwen now leads Humphries by just two points. Humphries also faces Josh Rock and Stephen Bunting in his next two quarterfinals, which offers good chances to pick up points.
Josh Rock will not make the playoffs anymore, that conclusion can be drawn after thirteen of the sixteen league nights. The Northern Irishman was still on zero after seven weeks, but then won four quarterfinals in a row. Two defeats in the last two weeks, however, kept him stuck on eight points. “Rocky” can still reach a maximum of 23 points, and that will not be enough. Rock can, however, turn into a party pooper for the players who can still reach the playoffs.
Rock’s last win over Humphries already dates back more than a year and a half. Since then Humphries has beaten Rock four times in a row, and the Englishman leads 5-3 in the head-to-head.

Luke Humphries has firmly reinserted himself into the playoff race
ADVERTISEMENT
Gian van Veen v Stephen Bunting
In his debut year in the Premier League Darts, Gian van Veen still has a shot at the playoffs with three league nights to go, which is already an excellent achievement. The Dutchman had a dip in March and April after suffering from kidney stones, but seems to have rediscovered his form. Against Stephen Bunting he will need to win to keep sight of a top-four spot.
Read also
For Stephen Bunting, a miracle is required to still reach the playoffs. On eleven points he is seven behind fourth place, and he also needs to make up five points on fifth and sixth. But like Josh Rock, Bunting can still be a troublesome opponent for players who remain in the playoff hunt. And should Bunting surprisingly take the nightly title in Leeds, a semifinal spot would not even be that far out of reach.
It’s close between these two players head-to-head. They have met twelve times. Bunting has won seven, and five wins have gone to Van Veen. In this Premier League they have both beaten each other once.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gian van Veen cannot afford to drop points

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






