“This isn’t right” – Phil Taylor says ‘new-age’ darts fans in fancy dress drove his decision to retire
PDCPhil Taylor has opened up on the tough upbringing that shaped his ruthless mentality, while also revealing how a changing darts landscape later left him questioning whether the sport was still for him.
ADVERTISEMENT
The sixteen-time world champion, who rose from humble beginnings with money as his early motivation, recalled how that same relentless mindset carried him to the top before a shift in crowd culture made him realise his career was coming to an end, speaking in conversation with the Double Tops podcast.
“I ain’t got no money” – the hunger behind the rise
Taylor’s journey began with a simple motivation. “Money was my motivation in the beginning, because obviously I ain’t got no money,” he said.
That first breakthrough win quickly showed how different the sport was at the time. “Then the first time I won, I think it was £500, I bought a shower from British Gas. Nobody had a shower. So, I had this power shower, which you press the button, it’s enormous,” he recalled. “The whole street were knocking. ‘Phil, can I have a look at your shower?’”
The scale of that early prize money remained a source of amusement as his career progressed. “I did! It’s great. £500, that was a lot of money then. And then when I won the worlds, the first one, it was £24,000,” he said. “And my neighbours again were knocking on, ‘Phil, can we have a look at that money? I’ve never seen £24,000.’ I said, ‘I haven’t got it, it’s in the bank, it’s a cheque.’ He thought they’d give me a suitcase full of money, like I was a bank robber or something, it was brilliant. I said, ‘I haven’t got it.’”
From those beginnings, Taylor would go on to dominate the sport for more than two decades, winning 16 world titles and setting a standard that still defines the professional game.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
“Are you a man or a mouse?” – the mentality that defined an era
That success was rooted in a mindset shaped long before the titles arrived. “Well, my dad with my mother, I mean, if I’d have said I got mental health, she’d have said, are you a man or a mouse? Get on with it,” he said. “Yeah, suck it up and get on with it. You’ve got a family to look after.”
That same approach carried through into his everyday life. “You couldn’t lie in bed either. When I was working, I was working seven days a week,” Taylor said. “If I said to my mother, she did it once, it only happens once. Get up. I’m up and I’m banging my foot on the ceiling. You’re banging your foot again, you little swine. Get up. The next thing you know, bucket of water.”
Even at the height of his dominance, that mentality never changed. “My dad’s forte was, right, you’ve won that, put the trophy over there, get ready for your next one. Because you’re only as good as your next tournament,” he said. “If you win the World Championship and then you’re playing a Players and get beat, you’re going to be plastered.”
It was that relentless outlook that underpinned a career in which Taylor reached 21 world finals and dominated the sport across multiple generations.
ADVERTISEMENT

Phil Taylor in action
“This isn’t right” – the moment everything changed
Despite that success, Taylor has revealed there was a clear moment when things began to feel different. “I was never really sure when, or if, I would want to retire but I was told that I would wake up one morning and just know that I’d had enough,” he said.
That moment came during one of his most successful events. “I was playing Terry Jenkins at the World Matchplay – I always thought the crowd at that tournament were the best around,” he recalled. “They were real darts fans and I looked around during my match with Terry and the atmosphere wasn’t what it used to be. That was the first time I was thinking, ‘this isn’t right and my career is coming to an end.’”
He suggested that shift was tied to a broader change in the sport’s audience. “I wasn’t used to the sort of new-age crowd of everyone at the bar in fancy dress, and I think that’s the same with the worlds now,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was a contrast to the environment in which he had built his career. “I’d struggle being a commentator or that type of role because I’ve always been used to being able to say whatever I want – but you can’t do that these days,” he admitted.
Even with that growing sense that the end was approaching, the process itself was not immediate. “I knew roughly when I was going to retire but that year really dragged out – a bit like when you’re waiting to go on holiday,” he said.
That combination of early hunger, relentless mentality and eventual disconnect with a changing sport ultimately brought an end to a career that not only dominated darts, but helped shape it into the global spectacle it is today.
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 16visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






