Wessel Nijman again king of Eindhoven: second win in a row at the Zwaantje Masters after victory in final against Danny Noppert
PDC
Wessel Nijman and the Zwaantje Masters appear to be a golden combination. For the second year in a row he managed to win the prestigious tournament in Eindhoven. In the final this time he was too strong for Danny Noppert, successfully defending his title.
ADVERTISEMENT
Eighth edition with strong field of participants
The eighth edition of the Zwaantje Masters once again offered a field of participants full of quality and international allure. Flying in from England were Scott Williams and former World Championship finalist Andy Hamilton. Devon Petersen wrote history as the first South African participant, while national top players such as Danny Noppert, Wessel Nijman and Wesley Plaisier defended the Dutch honor. A total of 42 darters started the group stage on Saturday afternoon.

Devon Petersen attended the tournament
Favorites convince in group stage
The tournament started at 1 p.m., divided into seven groups of six players. The top two from each group and the top two numbers three qualified for the last sixteen. For the big names, this meant starting sharp, and so did most of them.
However, Marvin van Velzen had a rough start and lost his first match to Willem van de Ven (4-2). Thanks to three convincing wins, including a game with an average of over 100, he still managed to qualify for the knock-out phase, albeit third in his group. For Corné Groeneveld and Damian Mol the tournament ended early: they did not survive the group stage.
Notable were the strong performances by Jimmy van Schie and Martijn Dragt, who both recorded averages above 101. Hamilton, Plaisier, Nijman and Noppert won all their five pool matches and reached the evening rounds without any problems.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Surprises in the final sixteen
The first big surprises occurred in the knockout stage. Jimmy van Schie, tipped as favorite by many, lost to Danny van Trijp (5-2). Van Velzen took revenge after his difficult group stage by eliminating Wesley Plaisier 5-3, partly thanks to great finishes of 122 and 150.
Nijman and Williams caused a spectacle by throwing a 140-finish on double 16 almost simultaneously. In the end Nijman proved to be the strongest in the quarterfinals between them, culminating in a phenomenal 170 finish. Van Velzen eliminated Dennis Beeren 6-0, while Noppert convincingly defeated Martijn Dragt. Van Trijp had to go deep against Jamai van den Herik, but managed to reach the quarterfinals after an exciting match.
Only the Dutch were left in the semifinals. Noppert faced Van Velzen and showed his class with a 136 and 130 finish. The Dutchman qualified convincingly for the final.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nijman had to get past Van Trijp and showed why he was the defending champion. With his second 170-finish of the day and strong legs in 13 and 14 arrows, he took control. Van Trijp came back briefly, but in the end Nijman went into the final match 2-1 in sets.
Read also
Nijman versus Noppert awaits
The final between Noppert and Nijman was one to savour. Noppert, a finalist twice before but still without a title, was hoping to finally achieve success. Nijman wanted to prolong his title.
The match began spectacularly. Nijman opened with a 112 finish and took the first set 2-1. Noppert hit back in set two by keeping his own leg three times. Noppert dropped his level a bit, while Nijman took advantage and took the third set with a great 10-darter.
ADVERTISEMENT

Danny Noppert went down in the final against Wessel Nijman
In the fourth set, Noppert showed resilience with a 120-finish, but in the deciding leg Nijman was untouchable. With scores of 180 and 140, he laid the foundation, then decided the game with an 81-finish for a 12-darter.
With his second title in a row at the Zwaantje Masters, Wessel Nijman confirms his status as one of the greatest Dutch darts talents of the moment. He not only dominated in the group stage, but also showed his class in the crucial moments.
Just like in 2024, Nijman can call himself the king of Eindhoven. For the organization and the public, the final between Nijman and Noppert provided exactly the spectacle that was hoped for in advance.
Results Zwaantje Masters 2025
| Player 1 | Score | Player 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Last 16 | ||
| Marvin van Velzen | 5-3 | Wesley Plaisiere |
| Dennis Beeren | 5-1 | Jan van den Broek |
| Danny Noppert | 5-2 | Willem van de Ven |
| Martijn Dragt | 5-0 | Jeffrey Sparidaans |
| Jamai van den Herik | 5-4 | Andy Hamilton |
| Danny van Trijp | 5-2 | Jimmy van Schie |
| Wessel Nijman | 5-2 | Devon Petersen |
| Scott Williams | 5-2 | Jurjen van der Velde |
| Quarter-finals | ||
| Marvin van Velzen | 6-0 | Dennis Beeren |
| Danny Noppert | 6-3 | Martijn Dragt |
| Danny van Trijp | 6-5 | Jamai van den Herik |
| Wessel Nijman | 6-4 | Scott Williams |
| Semi-Finals | ||
| Danny Noppert | 2-0 | Marvin van Velzen |
| Wessel Nijman | 2-0 | Danny van Trijp |
| Final | ||
| Wessel Nijman | 3-1 | Danny Noppert |
ADVERTISEMENT
Wessel Nijman wins the #ZwaantjeMasters2025!!
— Wim Blokpoel Darts🎯🇳🇱 (@Wim_NL180) August 23, 2025
The defending champion succesfully defended his title as he beat Danny Noppert 3-1 in sets in the final!!! pic.twitter.com/HCn5X2SRow

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







