It's day two of the Melbourne Darts Masters, and Damon Heta is well and truly at it again.
ADVERTISEMENT
Not satisfied with an incredible win in Brisbane, the DPA star is on the march in Melbourne. We'll get to him later. The second and last day of Melbourne Darts Masters starts with the top seed, and the in-form player. In this case, that's two different people entirely.
Haupai Puha was hoping that he could reverse last week's 6-2 defeat to Raymond van Barneveld. Instead, he was thumped 6-1. A scintillating showing and a 106 average from Barney makes him a dangerous prospect. Peter Wright, after another ill-judged darts swap, was lucky that Corey Cadby had very little in his locker. Could van Barneveld spring a surprise on Snakebite?
On paper, the second tie of the tournament is bound to be an absolute stunner. Michael van Gerwen and Gary Anderson aren't in the best of form. But given their immense talent and competitiveness, this tie's a powder keg that could go off, just as much as it could fizzle out. Both would like to claim the Melbourne Darts Masters title, for different reasons.
Wizard hoping for magic session
It really is no wonder that Damon Heta is planning a move to the UK and a shot at getting a PDC Tour Card. If the Brisbane Darts Masters didn't show off his credentials enough, a stunning 6-1 mauling of James Wade really hammered it home. The Perth star is out for the Melbourne Darts Masters trophy, make no mistake. Rob Cross has a point to prove after losing last week's final against Heta. After Robbie King failed to test Voltage, Heta will definitely turn up the heat.
Daryl Gurney versus Simon Whitlock looks like the closest tie on paper. One stat that underlines that assumption is the first round averages: Gurney managed 97.57, Whitlock racked up 97.62. Both will score well - it might be all down to the doubles. Superchin's superb 75 per cent conversion rate on the doubles against Kyle Anderson would surely see him through, if he can replicate it on Sunday.
ADVERTISEMENT
For anyone who was worried that Michael van Gerwen and Raymond van Barneveld met for the last time ever on stage in Rotterdam, there's a chance that the Dutch icons could clash again on Sunday evening. Or late morning, as it'll be here.
Our livescore feature will be keeping you up to date with all the action - follow this link to take a look.
Melbourne Darts Masters schedule
Quarter-Finals
9:40 Peter Wright v Raymond van Barneveld
10:15 Michael van Gerwen v Gary Anderson
10:50 Rob Cross v Damon Heta
12:30 Daryl Gurney v Simon Whitlock
10:15 Michael van Gerwen v Gary Anderson
10:50 Rob Cross v Damon Heta
12:30 Daryl Gurney v Simon Whitlock
Semi-Finals
Wright/van Barneveld v Van Gerwen/Anderson
Cross/Heta vs Gurney/Whitlock
Final
Winner SF1 vs Winner SF2
All best of 15 legs
ADVERTISEMENT
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026