"I was devastated, I cried for a week": Lorraine Winstanley still refuses to re-watch heartbreaking Lakeside final loss
MODUSLorraine Winstanley has spent over 30 years in the game, lifting some of the sport’s biggest trophies and inspiring a new generation of women players. But one moment still haunts her.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I was devastated. I cried for a week,” she recalls, reflecting on her 2019 Lakeside World Championship final loss to Mikuru Suzuki. “It meant that much. It’s the only thing I haven’t achieved. I still haven’t watched the final back. I just can’t do it.”
Winstanley, speaking on the Tungsten Talk at the MODUS Super Series, opened up in emotional and honest fashion — revisiting both her proudest moments and deepest disappointments from a life in darts.
A Final That Still Hurts
Winstanley entered the 2019 Lakeside tournament as the number one seed, having just claimed the World Masters title. But in the final, Suzuki delivered one of the most eye-catching debut performances the stage has seen.
Read also
“On paper, Mikuru and I were quite closely matched — she maybe had the edge on stats, but there wasn’t much in it,” Winstanley said. “I thought, ‘Raise your game — you’ve got nothing to lose.’ But she just raised the bar. I didn’t play badly. She just played better.”
Winstanley even joked about one surreal moment in the final: “I actually wanted her to hit the nine-darter. I thought, ‘Get it out your system, fall to bits, and I’ll swoop in!’ But none of that happened.”
Despite the heartbreak, she holds her place in that final — and the company she keeps — with pride. “It’s still a lovely ring to it: ‘World Championship finalist’. Deta [Hedman], Fallon [Sherrock] — they’ve reached finals and not crossed the line. So it’s not a bad bunch to be part of.”
Despite the heartbreak, she holds her place in that final — and the company she keeps — with pride. “It’s still a lovely ring to it: ‘World Championship finalist’. Deta [Hedman], Fallon [Sherrock] — they’ve reached finals and not crossed the line. So it’s not a bad bunch to be part of.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The Long Road to the Top
Winstanley’s rise in darts didn’t come through academies or early-stage competitions — it started behind a pub bar in Buxton, where women weren’t even allowed on the team.
“I worked in a pub and was itching to play for the darts team, but they said, ‘No, we don’t have women in the team,’” she remembered.
“Then one night they were short, and I said, ‘I thought you didn’t have women in the team?’ They said, ‘It’s better than giving a game away.’ So I played. And I said, ‘If I win, you don’t drop me.’ I don’t think they expected me to win. But I did.” From there, Winstanley went on to captain that same pub team before progressing into Super League, county darts and eventually the international stage. "There weren’t many women playing back then, but we just wanted to get involved. It just stemmed from there.”

Lorraine Winstanley's finest moment came in 2017
Masters Glory and Number One Status
ADVERTISEMENT
Her proudest career moment came in 2017 at the World Masters — a title she still remembers with crystal clarity.
“I remember how heavy the trophy was! They said, ‘Lift it,’ and I was like, ‘I’m trying!’” she laughed.
“Hearing, ‘Game, shot, and the match’ — it was like, ‘Oh my god, I’ve just won the Masters.’ One of the highlights of my career, without a doubt.”
Shortly afterwards, she reached the pinnacle of the rankings as women’s world number one. “Being world number one was never really on my hit list, I like to set achievable goals,” she said. “I wasn’t even looking at the rankings. So when I got there, it was just a bonus.” Though she can’t remember exactly where she was when she found out, it’s a milestone that still makes her proud. “I’ve been there. I’ve done that. I’m super proud of that.”
A Love Affair with Lakeside
For all her achievements, Winstanley still considers Lakeside the most magical venue in darts.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Driving through the gates for the first time, I had goosebumps. It was surreal,” she said. “And every year I went back, I got the same feeling — it was like coming home. There’s no stage like it. It can make or break a player. Every year, no matter what your form is, you go in thinking, ‘This is going to be my year.’”
She remembers being inspired by Trina Gulliver while watching the TV in her local pub — long before she believed it could become reality. “I remember watching Trina and thinking, ‘I can do that. I want to play there one day.’” And eventually, she did — making it all the way to the final.
Giving Back to the Game
Now, Winstanley balances playing with a key role at Target Darts, helping to manage the Elite 1 programme and support the company’s growing network of youth academies.
“I help run the academies and scout new talent,” she explained. “I take a lot of pride in watching the youngsters come through. They’re the future of our sport.”
ADVERTISEMENT
She says the rise of players like Luke Littler is changing perceptions of darts for good. “He’s done what Fallon did for the women — he’s made darts cool,” she said.
“We’ve got kids coming into the academy whose families don’t even play darts. They’ve just seen Luke on TV and think, ‘I want to do that.’ What he’s done is unbelievable. If I’ve played a tiny part in somebody’s journey, then job done. I’m proud of that.”
Still Chasing That Stage
Despite her shift into mentorship and development, Winstanley still has personal goals in the game. At the time of her interview, she was clinging on to the final qualifying spot for the Women’s World Matchplay — with just one weekend of events remaining. “I’ve been in this position before,” she said. “I’m working and practising hard to try and qualify. That’s as far as I’m planning — we’ll talk about what’s next after June!” She did qualify from there losing out early but she got to Blackpool.
Her own playing calendar may have become more selective, but Winstanley is always ready to compete — especially when the MODUS Super Series calls.
“I love coming here,” she said. “It’s great for women’s darts. It gives exposure to new players and showcases the strength we have. I might not play week in, week out anymore, but I’ll always say yes when I get the call. I’m loving every minute.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 75visitors 7
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






