"Can hardly imagine him bouncing around the circuit as number 24": Elmar Paulke and Florian Hempel debate Michael Van Gerwen's future amid ranking downfall
PDC
There was a time when Michael van Gerwen looked almost unstoppable on the world’s darts stages. When the Dutchman stepped up to the oche, the result often seemed a foregone conclusion – even when he was behind. His presence, pace, and ruthless scoring defined an era in which he not only dominated the game but also changed it.
ADVERTISEMENT
Commentator and darts expert Elmar Paulke, together with former Tour Card holder Florian Hempel, looked back on exactly that period in the latest episode of the “Game On” podcast. The occasion was a look back at the 2016 UK Open – the tournament where van Gerwen defended his title and joined an exclusive club.
The time when van Gerwen changed the game
When van Gerwen won the UK Open again in 2016, he became only the third player after Phil Taylor and Raymond van Barneveld to successfully defend the title at the “FA Cup of Darts.” Only this past weekend, Luke Littler became the next player to pull off the feat.
Schied im Achtelfinale der UK Open 2026 deutlich mit 3:10 gegen James Wade aus: Michael van Gerwen
For Hempel, that time is still closely tied to the first years of his own passion for darts. “There isn’t much of that left in the Man in Green, who doesn’t even play in green anymore – which, by the way, took some getting used to for me,” he said.
The images from that period still leave him in awe. “I’m immediately transported back to my early days in darts. In 2016 I had nothing to do with darts at all; I only picked up my first darts in 2017. But what that guy did back then – how he dominated the European Tour, the Pro Tour, how he set record averages, including in the Premier League – that was Phil Taylor combined with absolute power scoring.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Paulke sees van Gerwen above all as the player who forced a new style on the tour. “The cool thing about van Gerwen was that he established a new game on tour. That aggressive game – which annoyed Phil Taylor as well. That way of playing darts didn’t exist before.”
For Paulke, a particularly striking example was the 2016 UK Open semifinal. “When I saw those images: he somehow looked twenty years younger. The way he stood on stage, with such conviction – even when he trailed Phil Taylor 1-4 in the semifinal and turned it around. As a spectator, you didn’t feel for a second that he could lose that match.”
The start of a new era
For Hempel, van Gerwen was not only a dominant player but also a trailblazer for a new generation. His emotional style, his outbursts on stage, and his aggressive body language were unusual at the time.
“He brought a completely different vibe to the stage,” Hempel explained. “It didn’t just get on Phil Taylor’s nerves. We also remember the skirmishes with Mervyn King, who had no idea what van Gerwen was doing and how he was letting it all out.”
ADVERTISEMENT
It is interesting that similar behavior was later judged much more harshly in other players. “Gerwyn Price was heavily criticized for it at times – even though van Gerwen had been doing it long before him. He just never really got the same backlash.”
For Hempel, that period marked a turning point in modern darts. “That was the start of a new era. Today we see even more young guns, even more emotion, even more interaction with the fans. We really owe van Gerwen a great deal.”
Why the dominator is no longer the same
But the van Gerwen of old now only flashes up occasionally. For Paulke, that is not only down to stronger competition, but also to changes in the Dutchman’s life.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I really feel – similar to Dimitri Van den Bergh – that he finds it hard to play well if he isn’t fully focused on darts,” said Paulke.
A look at the start of van Gerwen’s career explains a lot from his point of view. “If you look at his life story, he says himself: He wasn’t particularly good at football and didn’t get any recognition there. Darts was the sport that earned him that recognition.”
That motivation shaped his dominant years. “Back then he did everything for darts. If you look at how many tournaments he played – he didn’t take any breaks. Even at home in the Netherlands he still played pub tournaments. For him, it was basically only darts.”
Hempel confirms that picture. “He worked at darts. He was truly a darts grafter who spent every free second throwing arrows at the board.”
Today, the situation is different. “On the one hand, there are private issues, and on the other, health topics. And of course there’s also this: if you’re successful for a long time and earn a lot of money, you get a bit spoilt. I wouldn’t say complacent – but you live more calmly. Those last three percent of hunger for the next title or the next prize money just fade.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Between family, pressure, and reality
Another factor, according to Paulke, is the change in his private life. Van Gerwen has long been a family man — a role that automatically brings new priorities.
“Once you have a family, you can’t just say: I only play darts and that’s my life,” said Paulke. “You get distracted, your outlook widens. I genuinely believe it’s difficult for him to balance both perfectly.”
Hempel draws a comparison with another current superstar: Luke Littler. “He’s in a completely different place than Littler is today. Littler still lives with his parents, the laundry gets done, there’s cooking. That’s a totally different situation from having two kids at home.”
The open question for 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
On the sporting side, there were positive signs this season. Van Gerwen enjoyed a strong start to the World Series campaign in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and also began the Premier League well, winning a night straight away and reaching another final.
But health issues set him back. “He had to take antibiotics and couldn’t compete,” Paulke recalled. “I think that pulled him out of that little wave of success again.”
That uncertainty was also evident at the UK Open. “He plays a superb match against Nathan Aspinall,” said Paulke. “But then the way he goes out against James Wade — I get the feeling he no longer dares to step on stage with that presence. Maybe because he’s afraid he can’t sustain it in terms of performance.”
Hempel also sees an issue with the Dutchman’s self-image. “He used to always say: I beat everyone here, they all play three levels below me. That’s part of the MvG DNA.”
But when results and averages no longer match that, the stance quickly loses its effect. “If you start celebrating a 180 or the 23rd dart that hits double 1, it just doesn’t come across the way it used to.”
ADVERTISEMENT
That leaves a big question open, which also concerns Paulke: “What does van Gerwen bring in 2026?”
The potential movement in the world rankings, which can already be theoretically examined in the virtual rankings after the 2027 World Championship, is hardly imaginable for many observers. “The topic this year is: How far does he drop?” said Paulke. Hempel summed up the current snapshot: “As it stands, he drops to 24th.”
And that very thought seems almost surreal in the context of his career. “What does van Gerwen do if he’s number 24 in the world?” asked Paulke. “I can hardly imagine him bouncing around the circuit as number 24.”
Whether it really comes to that remains open. For Hempel, at least one thing is clear: “He’s too young to quit.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026