“Where did that come from?” - Breaking down the most shocking one-off performances on the 2025 PDC Tour
PDC
There are 128 PDC Tour Card holders competing on the Pro Tour in 2025, and the standard continues to rise across the board. Monster averages are becoming increasingly common — but dig a little deeper, and some intriguing patterns emerge.
ADVERTISEMENT
Specifically, the gap between a player’s highest and second-highest average can tell us something about their level of consistency — or lack thereof. A handful of players have produced one-off, world-class displays that tower above the rest of their season's form.
Top of that list is Berry van Peer. The Dutchman, who regained his Tour Card last year after some time away, has posted a superb 117.88 at his peak. But his second-best effort? A much lower 104.11 — a staggering difference of 13.77 points. No one else on tour comes close to that kind of swing.
Robert Owen sits second. The Welshman – fighting to retain his Tour Card heading into the end of the season – has a top average of 115.85, with his next-best at 104.07, a gap of 11.78 points.
Read also
In third is Ritchie Edhouse, whose standout display came in at 120.24, more than ten points ahead of his second-best of 109.48. It’s yet another case of a player producing a moment of brilliance out of nowhere.
It’s perhaps surprising to see José de Sousa only fourth. The Portuguese ace is known for his explosive scoring, and his highest average of 127.00 is the best of anyone on this list. Even his “second-best” of 117.10 is elite-level — but still, that’s a 9.90-point gap, highlighting just how ridiculous his peak performance was.
Kim Huybrechts rounds out the top five, with a 121.97 best and 112.20 second-best. A swing of 9.77 points, and further evidence that the Belgian remains capable of going through the gears when he’s on song.
ADVERTISEMENT

Huybrechts in action
Further down the rankings, Max Hopp sits not far behind with a swing of 8.74 between his best two averages, while Maximilian Czerwinski and Daryl Gurney both show a gap just shy of seven points — 6.96 and 6.95, respectively. For Gurney, that 117.12 best average still stands up as world-class, but again, the contrast with his second-best (110.17) is notable.
Gary Anderson, typically one of the game’s more consistent scorers, has a 6.71-point difference between his best (123.83) and second-best (117.12) performances. Rusty-Jake Rodriguez shows a similar spread at 6.46, with Luke Littler just behind him on 6.45 — further proof that even darts’ teenage sensation occasionally hits another gear entirely.
Rounding things out are Tim Wolters (100.82 vs 94.48), Adam Lipscombe (103.78 vs 97.48), and George Killington (114.15 vs 107.97) — all showing differences in the six-point range. While their overall figures may not be headline-grabbing, the degree of separation between their best and second-best displays follows the same theme: when it clicks, it really clicks.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
The takeaway?
These stats aren’t about who has the best overall average or most consistent form — they highlight the explosive ceiling that some players hit, even if only once. For some, it’s a sign of untapped potential that could soon become the norm. For others, it might just be one of those magical days where everything goes in.
Either way, it’s a reminder that in this era of relentless scoring and fine margins, even a single standout performance can leave fans — and opponents — asking: “Where did that come from?”
Inspired by something that happened in the Asian Tour today, I decided to look at TCHs PBs vs their 2nd best averages. I now present to you the "Where The Heck Did That Come From?" leaderboard. BvP's best is nearly 14 higher than his second best! pic.twitter.com/gPCMV090FP
— FEBsData (@FEBsData) August 3, 2025

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026







