From 17 to 20 September, the AFAS Live in Amsterdam once again hosts the battle for the title at the
World Series of Darts Finals. Officially the tournament is part of the PDC majors, but within the darting world it does not seem to command the same respect as many other televised events. A completely different format could change that from 2027 onwards.
Ask a player which major he would most like to see dropped from the calendar or which big event he considers least important, and chances are the World Series Finals will be mentioned. That lack of prestige is perhaps best illustrated by Gary Anderson. The Scot declined an invitation for both the previous and the current editions.
The qualification set-up does not help either. The field features 32 players. In addition to a few winners from the Tour Card Holders’ Qualifier and four players invited via the world ranking, the top 24 of the World Series Order of Merit book their places at the Finals. It is precisely that last element that draws criticism.
Van der Voort hits out at the qualification system
Vincent van der Voort recently
took aim at the current format on his podcast Darts Draait Door. According to the former professional, participation in World Series events is rewarded too heavily, without necessarily requiring strong results.
“There are people getting in who haven’t won a single match and they’re rewarded with a finals tournament. That makes no sense at all,” says Van der Voort. “If you practice sport, it’s about performance.”
Van der Voort cites Simon Whitlock as an example. Because the Australian has played multiple World Series events, he can, according to the ex-pro, collect enough points to finish high on the ranking even with two heavy defeats. “Which idiot came up with that? Then there’s something seriously wrong in your head.”
A straightforward alternative might be to simply send the best 32 players from the World Series Order of Merit to the Finals. But Van der Voort sees little merit in that either. “Then you really get a very poor tournament. You’ll have people who lost 6-1 still in the frame. If they lost 6-0, they might still be close.”
According to Van der Voort, the current construction mainly shows that no better solution has been found. “Players always go on about how you have to perform. And then you do things like this. If you can’t come up with a better system than this, something’s wrong. They’re just winging it.”
Simon Whitlock qualified for the World Series Finals without winning a match
Unlink the Finals from the World Series
There is, in my view, a more compelling solution. From 2027, completely disconnect the World Series Finals from
the regular World Series events. Give the event a new name, but preserve the international character the World Series was always meant to showcase.
The inspiration partly comes from the revamped format of the Grand Slam of Darts. From this year, that field expands from 32 to 48 players, with athletes from various international circuits invited to a major PDC event.
That choice is striking to me. The Grand Slam of Darts holds high status, and this change brings quite a few non–Tour Card players to the stage. Why not allocate those international qualifying spots to a tournament that is explicitly dedicated to darts’ global character?
Sixteen world-class players and sixteen international qualifiers
A refreshed international Finals could still feature 32 players. The first sixteen spots would go to the top 16 of the PDC Order of Merit. That guarantees a field with the absolute elite represented.
Then twelve places become available for players who have actually produced results on the various international circuits. My proposal would be to allocate two tickets to circuits with a continental scope and one ticket to the more regional tours.
Concretely, that would yield the following twelve entrants:
- Top 2 Asian Tour Order of Merit
- Top 2 CDC Order of Merit
- Top 2 African Tour
- Top 2 Championship Darts Latin America and Caribbean Tour
- Number one Nordic & Baltic Tour
- Number one Australian Tour
- Number one New Zealand Tour
- Number one China Pro Tour
When a circuit has not yet finished at the time of the tournament, players leading the relevant ranking at that moment can be invited.
The key difference from the current system is that participation alone is not enough. Anyone looking to secure a ticket must produce results on their own circuit during the season.
Four European wildcards complete the field
With sixteen players from the top of the world rankings and twelve representatives from international circuits, 28 of the 32 spots are allocated. The remaining four tickets can be used to engage the European market more explicitly in the event.
A geographical split could be applied. One spot goes to the highest-ranked Tour Card holder from Eastern Europe, one to the highest-ranked player from Northern Europe, one from Western Europe, and one from Southern Europe.
To determine which countries fall under each region, the classifications normally used for World Darts Championship qualifiers and/or the European Tour can be followed.
Based on the current world rankings, Krzysztof Ratajski, Jeffrey de Graaf, Jermaine Wattimena, and Cristo Reyes would be eligible for an invitation under this model.
Complete field
| 1 | #1 PDC Order of Merit | 17 | #1 Asian Tour Order of Merit |
| 2 | #2 PDC Order of Merit | 18 | #2 Asian Tour Order of Merit |
| 3 | #3 PDC Order of Merit | 19 | #1 CDC Tour Order of Merit |
| 4 | #4 PDC Order of Merit | 20 | #2 CDC Tour Order of Merit |
| 5 | #5 PDC Order of Merit | 21 | #1 African Continental Tour |
| 6 | #6 PDC Order of Merit | 22 | #2 African Continental Tour |
| 7 | #7 PDC Order of Merit | 23 | #1 Championship Darts Latin America and Caribbean Tour |
| 8 | #8 PDC Order of Merit | 24 | #2 Championship Darts Latin America and Caribbean Tour |
| 9 | #9 PDC Order of Merit | 25 | #1 Nordic & Baltic Tour |
| 10 | #10 PDC Order of Merit | 26 | #1 Australian Darts Association Tour |
| 11 | #11 PDC Order of Merit | 27 | #1 Dartplayers New Zealand Tour |
| 12 | #12 PDC Order of Merit | 28 | #1 China Pro Tour |
| 13 | #13 PDC Order of Merit | 29 | Highest-ranked Northern European player in the world rankings |
| 14 | #14 PDC Order of Merit | 30 | Highest-ranked Eastern European player in the world rankings |
| 15 | #15 PDC Order of Merit | 31 | Highest-ranked Southern European player in the world rankings |
| 16 | #16 PDC Order of Merit | 32 | Highest-ranked Western European player in the world rankings |
International profile and performance rewarded
This format keeps the field at 32 players and preserves the event’s international scope. In fact, players from Asia, North America, Africa, Latin America, Oceania, China, and different parts of Europe all get a clear pathway to the tournament. At the same time, quality at the top end is secured as the world’s best sixteen are automatically invited.
The crucial shift lies in how the remaining places are earned. Not the number of World Series invitations determines who reaches the season finale, but results achieved across the various circuits.
Michael van Gerwen is current champion in the end of year Finals.
That would allow the PDC to hit three targets at once: retain a major with a distinctly international flavour, genuinely reward players from different regions for their performances, and, thanks to the presence of the global top 16, remain assured of a strong field. The World Series Finals, in my view, do not need to disappear from the calendar. But from 2027, the tournament concept could be completely revamped.
A completely new format also warrants a new name. If the finale is decoupled from the regular World Series, the title
World Series of Darts Finals no longer fits. PDC Global Masters would be a suitable alternative. The name underlines the tournament’s global character, while “Masters” evokes an event that brings together the best from different regions. From 2027, the tournament would gain not only a new qualifying structure, but also its own identity that better matches the international nature of the field.