DartsNews Podcast | Our winners and losers of the 2026 darts season so far: Littler, Greaves and a controversial Noppert call
PDC
The opening weeks of a new darts season often produce a mix of confirmation and surprise, and on the latest episode of the DartsNews Podcast, co-hosts Kieran Wood and Nicolas Gayer selected their winners and losers of the 2026 season so far.
ADVERTISEMENT
On the latest episode of The DartsNews Podcast for co-hosts Kieran Wood and Nicolas Gayer, some picks were obvious. Others were more surprising. And in one case, the choice sparked a debate about expectations and context in the early months of the campaign.
The conversation ranged from dominant headline acts to quieter success stories, and also highlighted several big names who may already be feeling pressure after difficult starts to the year.
Littler and Greaves headline the podcast’s early winners
Some selections required little debate. For Wood, the standout winner of the season’s opening stretch was clear. “My three winners of 2026 so far are Luke Littler, for obvious reasons,” he said. “World Championship, World Masters, World Series events, European Tour titles. He might not have done it in the Premier League as of yet, but you can’t argue with what he’s won so far.”
Littler’s trophy haul has already shaped the early narrative of the year. Even in a sport accustomed to fast rises and sudden form swings, the teenager’s ability to convert deep runs into titles continues to set him apart.
Another name Wood highlighted was Beau Greaves, whose early 2026 form has continued the dominance she established last season. “Dominant on the Women’s Series continues, strong start to life on the ProTour, history-making nine-darter. It looks like the world is her oyster at the moment.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Greaves has not just maintained her level. She has expanded her profile. The nine-darter on the ProTour earlier this season was another milestone in a career that continues to push the boundaries of what is expected from players transitioning between the women’s circuit and the wider PDC field.
Emerging stories beyond the spotlight
While Littler and Greaves dominate headlines, the podcast discussion also turned toward names slightly further down the rankings who have quietly built impressive early-season momentum.
One of those, according to Wood, is Tom Bissell. “Obviously, he’s going into his second year on the tour and retaining that Tour Card was no certainty at the start of the year. But he’s already up to 19th on the ProTour Order of Merit. If he carries on like this, top 64 will be no issue at all for him.” For a player who began the season simply aiming to hold onto his Tour Card, that kind of rise represents a major shift in expectations.
Gayer also focused on players outside the immediate spotlight, beginning with Czech talent Adam Gawlas “When he won his Tour Card back at Q-School I thought he was one of the names you already know, but I didn’t expect him to crack the top 64 in his career,” Gayer admitted. “But he’s visibly worked on his game. The throwing action, the arm position, even the physical conditioning. The hard work is paying off.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Results have supported that assessment. Gawlas reached the semi-finals of Players Championship 1, added a board final the following day and qualified for multiple European Tour events in the opening weeks of the campaign.
Another return story that caught Gayer’s attention was Cristo Reyes. “He disappeared around 2020 and then suddenly came back through Q-School,” he explained. “And now he’s back on tour and it feels like he’s never been away.”
Reyes’ reappearance after several years outside the circuit has been one of the quieter but more fascinating developments of the early season. The Spaniard has already qualified for several European Tour events and produced solid runs on the ProTour, suggesting his comeback could have real staying power.
A German revival gathering momentum
ADVERTISEMENT
The discussion also highlighted a cluster of German players who have begun 2026 strongly.
Max Hopp was one of the most notable examples. After years spent fighting to regain his footing on tour, the former World Youth Champion has started the season with a series of consistent performances. “He hasn’t lost a first-round match on the Players Championship circuit yet,” Gayer noted.

Max Hopp, the mark of consistency
Joining him in that category is Lukas Wenig, a player Gayer described as someone who “doesn’t look for the spotlight but lets his darts do the talking.” Gabriel Clemens also featured prominently. After difficult seasons in 2024 and 2025, the German appears to have rediscovered some rhythm following a switch back to his former equipment during the last World Championship. Since then he has already hit a nine-darter and reached a ProTour quarter-final, hinting that a more stable phase of his career may be returning.
Big names struggling early in 2026
ADVERTISEMENT
Not every storyline from the season’s opening weeks has been positive. When turning to their early “losers” of 2026, Wood and Gayer highlighted several high-profile struggles.
Wood grouped two of the sport’s most recognisable names together when discussing the early losers of the campaign. “My first two are Peter Wright and Raymond van Barneveld,” he said. “Two of the biggest names the sport has ever had, but in 2026 they’ve just been really bad so far.” Both veterans have endured difficult runs of form across the ProTour in the early months of the season. Wright’s struggles have already been examined in greater detail elsewhere, while Van Barneveld’s situation also raised questions during the podcast discussion.
Read also
“I think the issue with Barney is that he doesn’t look like he wants to be there anymore,” Gayer said. “He has said himself he’s only playing because of the money. If you combine the pressure of needing the money with not enjoying the game anymore, that’s a dangerous mix.”
A controversial inclusion: Danny Noppert
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the more surprising names in Wood’s list of early-season “losers” was Danny Noppert. The Dutchman has not endured a disastrous start to the year statistically, but the expectation surrounding him heading into 2026 shaped the reasoning behind the pick.
“My final loser might be a slightly controversial one: Danny Noppert,” Wood said. “He went out early in the World Championship, obviously he would have expected a lot more. Missed out on Premier League selection, which was a big blow.”
The former UK Open champion was later handed a World Series opportunity, but Wood argued that the moment ultimately passed without a defining performance. “And then he got his World Series call-up but didn’t really make the most of it in Bahrain and Saudi with a couple of early exits.”
Danny Noppert controversially a loser?
On the ProTour, the results have been steady rather than spectacular. “He’s not had the greatest start to the Pro Tour. I know he’s around the top ten overall, but it’s not like he’s picked up a title or got to a final or anything like that. It’s just kind of been going about his business without being spectacular.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Gayer acknowledged that the choice might raise eyebrows, but agreed the reasoning had merit when placed in context. “Interesting, but good point,” he replied. “I would have never thought of him when thinking about losers, but you are right… I think in that specific context, as you said, 100 percent a candidate for this.”
It is worth noting that the podcast discussion took place before the 2026 UK Open, where Noppert would go on to reach the quarter-finals, offering an immediate response to the early-season concerns raised during the debate.
Form crisis raising early questions
Two further names completed Gayer’s list of early-season concerns. The first was Dimitri Van den Bergh, whose form on the ProTour has fallen sharply after an encouraging opening match of the year. “He won his first match averaging 103,” Gayer said. “But after that he won one more match and lost ten.”
Those defeats have often come with averages in the mid-70s, numbers that simply do not compete at the highest level of the PDC circuit. Wood suggested the Belgian’s issues may lie more in mindset than mechanics. “He’s always been someone who overthinks the game. If you’re losing a lot and overthinking every dart, that’s only going to make things worse.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The final name raised was Germany’s Martin Schindler. After a strong end to 2025, expectations were high heading into the new campaign. But an opening Players Championship defeat with a 66 average immediately raised concerns.
Schindler has shown signs of recovery since then, including a 104 average in a later ProTour run, yet the contrast with the momentum he carried into the season was enough for Gayer to label him one of the early setbacks of 2026.
Do you agree with the selections?
The early weeks of a darts season rarely tell the full story. Form can change quickly, and many of the players mentioned will have opportunities in the months ahead to reshape their campaigns.
But for now, these were the selections made on the DartsNews Podcast when Kieran Wood and Nicolas Gayer weighed up their winners and losers of the 2026 season so far.
Do you agree with the picks? Let us know in the comments below who your winners and losers of 2026 have been so far.

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







