DISCUSSION | Players Championship 17 & 18: Are we going to see Luke Humphries again on ProTour as strength of Dutch darts in effect again
PDCPlayers Championship 17 and 18 heralded two differing winners as you had Luke Humphries on his ProTour return no less providing the goods. 'Cool Hand' hasn't been in action outside of the Premier League for a bit and ironically he decided to withdraw again the day after.
ADVERTISEMENT
Then we had a completely brand new winner as Luke Woodhouse rose to the occasion. Woody has been one of only a few players who has not yet won a title and he finally managed to achieve that this past week.
But will we see Humphries again this season on the ProTour and a word also in our discussion for the myriad of top Dutch darters as of late which has become an Indian summer for the nation with a surprise that they didn't figure in the conversation when it came to a title unlike every other double header.
Read also
Luke Humphries' dazzling run to success
(as per DartConnect)
| Player 1 | Average | Score | VS | Score | Average | Player 2 |
| Finals | ||||||
| Luke Humphries | -104.89 | 8 | VS | 4 | -97.16 | Jermaine Wattimena |
| Semi-Finals | ||||||
| Luke Humphries | -102.88 | 7 | VS | 3 | -97.89 | Danny Noppert |
| Quarter-Finals | ||||||
| Luke Humphries | -94.67 | 6 | VS | 3 | -97.99 | Wessel Nijman |
| Top 16 | ||||||
| Luke Humphries | -105.64 | 6 | VS | 2 | -87.57 | Christian Kist |
| Top 32 | ||||||
| Luke Humphries | -109.11 | 6 | VS | 2 | -95.39 | Justin Hood |
| Top 64 | ||||||
| Luke Humphries | -103.83 | 6 | VS | 1 | -88.03 | Yorick Hofkens |
| Top 128 | ||||||
| Luke Humphries | -112.18 | 6 | VS | 3 | -90.47 | Rhys Griffin |
What does future hold for Humphries
Samuel Gill, Head Editor for DartsNews.com lauded Woodhouse and wonders what the future is for Humphries as to his schedule.
ADVERTISEMENT
Like many I'm a bit perturbed as to what Luke Humphries will now do for the rest of the season. He promptly pulled out of remaining ProTour this week and won his second title presumably to say he could do it then left. While Luke Woodhouse is very much a top success story as he has grinded on the ProTour to try and win his first and has not been able to but has now done it and gets that monkey off his back.
I personally don't see Humphries playing much going forward. Minehead is in the bag so feasibly he doesn't have to worry about much more and he can go back to not playing.
Dutch darts too as ever is in the spotlight when it comes to these events with Doets being superb, Nijman being there or thereabouts without winning and for a nation that has relied on MVG for so long they finally have top stars all over the shop.
Luke Humphries is currently only seventh in the Premier League Darts
Another disappointing set of tournaments for Van Veen
ADVERTISEMENT
Pieter Verbeek, Editor for DartsNieuws.com lauded the strength of Dutch darts as well as airing concerns for Gian van Veen and Mike de Decker
It takes some getting used to seeing a ProTour double-header without a Dutch winner again. After all, the last time that happened was back in February. Still, the Dutch contingent was far from invisible, especially on Monday during Players Championship 17.
No fewer than five Dutch players reached the quarter-finals, with three of them progressing to the semi-finals. Once again, it underlined how strongly Dutch darts is performing at the top and sub-top level of the sport. Jermaine Wattimena eventually reached the final, but proved no match for a dominant Luke Humphries.
The Englishman claimed his second floor title of the season and no longer has to worry about qualification for the Players Championship Finals. More importantly, the manner of the victory will provide a huge confidence boost for ‘Cool Hand Luke’ ahead of the Premier League Darts play-offs. Humphries averaged 102 or higher in six of his seven matches and finished the tournament with an outstanding overall average of 104.57, showing that he has rediscovered his best form at exactly the right moment.

Gian van Veen is the current world number three
ADVERTISEMENT
From a Dutch perspective, Tuesday was slightly less successful, although Kevin Doets once again reached the quarter-finals. It marked the ninth time already in 2026 that ‘Hawkeye’ has made at least the last eight on the floor circuit. Those are excellent numbers, and it is no coincidence that Doets has now broken into the world’s top 32 for the first time in his career.
While Humphries appears to have rediscovered his top level, the same cannot currently be said for Gian van Veen. The Dutchman endured another disappointing pair of tournaments, suffering defeats in the third round and first round respectively. Fortunately for Van Veen, his next truly major target does not arrive until mid-July with the World Matchplay in Blackpool. That is when ‘GVV The Giant’ will need to deliver and show why he is currently the world number three.
One player who does appear to be finding his way back is Dimitri Van den Bergh. The Belgian picked up five wins in Leicester and secured crucial prize money in the battle to retain his Tour Card. Kim Huybrechts also strengthened his position in the race for the World Matchplay, although ‘The Hurricane’ let several good opportunities slip to go even deeper on both tournament days.
For Mike De Decker, however, the outlook is far less positive. The former World Grand Prix champion suffered two first-round exits and appears set for a significant drop on the world rankings once the prize money from his World Grand Prix triumph falls off the ranking in October.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Can Woodhouse now kick on after title success?
“I’ve been thinking about not playing any Players Championships next year, to be honest.” Those were the words of Luke Humphries last year at the Grand Slam of Darts. The packed darting schedule mixed with Players Championship, Euro Tour, World Series and Premier League Darts is a lot for someone like Humphries who has a young family.
The reason I pull this quote up is that after winning his second PC title of 2026, are we going to see him again this year on the floor? He has collected £37,000 on the floor this year from just seven events. That may be enough to qualify for the Players Championship Finals in Minehead, relieving any pressure on the world number two and allowing him to spend more time at home with him family instead of being on the road. His decision to not compete in PC18 was an interesting one in my eyes. Surely someone who has averaged over 100 in all but one game the day before would be brimming with confidence going into another day of action.
I also want to point out on the strength of Dutch darts at the moment. There were five top darters residing from the nation in the quarter-final stage, none of them boasting the name Michael van Gerwen or Gian van Veen. While outside the likes of Danny Noppert, Wessel Nijman and possibly Kevin Doets, the big two are still the most likely to be competing for major glory with the others a little off the pace. However, the fact that so many are going deep at this level is a hugely promising sign.
Onto PC18, and the return of Harry Ward has caught everyone off guard. It was seven years to the day since ‘Big H’ reached a PC semi-final, repeating the fate in fine fashion after taking down Doets in the quarter-final. While he averaged over 90 just twice throughout the day, he was winning matches of darts. A very key skill to have as he takes his chance after being drawn up as a late withdrawal. It will be interesting if he continues to make impressions back on the ProTour.
ADVERTISEMENT

Can Woodhouse kick on.
If we are on the discussion of winning, Luke Woodhouse knows a thing or two thanks to his impressive consistency. Whether on the floor or the big stage in recent times, you know what you are going to get with ‘Woody’: a very solid performance without a title. Well, the mantle has now passed down to Niels Zonneveld who is the highest ranked player not to win a PDC ranking title.
Here is the big question: can Woodhouse kick on? I believe he will to an extent. In his interview afterwards you could tell he was relieved and proud to get over the line, but that this was just the start. He wanted to plough on and win more things. That I think he will on the floor and maybe Euro Tour, but there are gears that are needed to rise for Woodhouse if he is going to challenge for a major title.
Is Doets getting too little out of his displays.
For Nicolas Gayer, Editor for DartsNews.DE, Humphries has got his mojo back but he has questioned whether Kevin Doets is getting too little out of his displays.
ADVERTISEMENT
104.57 — that was the tournament average with which Luke Humphries crowned himself the winner of Players Championship 17 on Monday. It was the second-highest tournament average ever recorded by a Players Championship winner in the DartConnect era.
It was an incredible day of darts from the 2024 World Champion, who appears to have rediscovered his absolute best form over recent weeks. In his last twelve official PDC matches, Humphries has averaged below 100 only once — a run that includes absurd performances of 112.18, 110.98, and 109.11 points in the averages. The world number two looks ready to defend his Premier League Darts crown.
Another name that once again has to be discussed after both tournament days is Kevin Doets. The Dutchman’s current run must be one of the most remarkable purple patches by an emerging player that I can remember in recent years. Whenever you check DartConnect on a Pro Tour day and see an average somewhere between 105 and 110, you almost automatically expect the name next to those numbers to be Kevin Doets.
Read also
And yet, there is almost a debate to be had over whether the newly crowned PDC title winner is still getting too little out of his incredible performances. Looking at all of his floor matches up to and including the quarter-finals, Doets has won 44 of his last 52 matches. This season, across 18 tournaments, he has reached the semi-finals five times — but has only managed to win one of them. On that day, he also went on to claim the title. So far, the semi-final stage appears to be the Achilles’ heel of this incredible player, especially when looking at his averages, which curiously tend to drop unusually low in those matches.
ADVERTISEMENT
Players Championship 18 then provided another feel-good story to close out the Pro Tour week: Luke Woodhouse finally rewarded himself for years of hard-earned, steady progress by winning his first senior PDC title. In the final, he faced a man who needed 442 attempts to win his first Players Championship title — only to reach another final less than a week later. Andrew Gilding is ageing better than any fine wine and, quite incidentally, remains one of the classiest characters on the tour. The way he asked Woodhouse after the match dart whether it was his first title — and then reacted with what, by Andrew Gilding standards, was an explosion of emotion in celebration for his fellow Englishman — was, for me, the most heart-warming moment of this Pro Tour week.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








