European Tour Order of Merit Update: Aspinall succeeds Littler as leader after Göttingen success, Humphries continues poor start
PDC
By winning the European Darts Trophy, Nathan Aspinall not only claimed the top prize of 30,000 pounds, but also took over first place from Luke Littler on the European Tour Order of Merit.
ADVERTISEMENT
Littler, who had won the Belgian Darts Open in early March, was missing from the Euro Tour tournament in Göttingen last weekend. Aspinall took the title there Sunday night by beating successively Ritchie Edhouse (6-5), Jermaine Wattimena (6-5), Luke Humphries (6-1), Gary Anderson (7-6) and Ryan Joyce (8-4). It was the first time "The Asp" had managed to win a title on the European Tour.
Joyce rose to fifth place through his final place finish. At 13,250 pounds, he only has to face Mike de Decker (16,000 pounds) and Ross Smith (14,500 pounds) for now, in addition to Aspinall and Littler.
Behind Joyce is Gerwyn Price in sixth place with 12,000 pounds. Behind him is Dave Chisnall with 10,000 pounds, before Gary Anderson, Michael van Gerwen and James Wade complete the top-10 with 8,500 pounds.
Anderson and Van Gerwen made it to the semifinals at the European Darts Trophy and secured their first pounds for the rankings. Wade lost his first match in Göttingen, so his prize money does not count for the Euro Tour ranking. Wade had previously made it to the last four at the Belgian Darts Open in Wieze, however.
Number one in the world Luke Humphries has not started the new Euro Tour season very successfully and is in a shared nineteenth place with 6000 pounds. He sits alongside Cameron Menzies. He suffered a crushing loss to Nathan Aspinall 6-1 this weekend.
He finally added money onto his ranking but the late loss confounded his European Tour woes so far despite green shoots of form so far.
ADVERTISEMENT
Jonny Clayton and Stephen Bunting aren't much better off. They sit in joint 21st with £6,000 each. The latter decided to skip this weekend. While Clayton ran into the wall that is physically and metaphorically, Martin Schindler.
After a crushing loss to Nathan Aspinall, Luke Humphries hasn't done his hopes a lot of good.
He sits 11th on the Order of Merit and has dominated German events in the past few years and is their best hope. So with Clayton he perhaps couldn't do much. Also currently just in are Rob Cross, Damon Heta among others. Peter Wright for instance has picked up no money at all so sits nowhere on the Order of Merit as of right now.
Of course a long time to put it right but Aspinall for instance who sometimes struggles to qualify for majors has already basically rubber stamped his spot in Dortmund. While also alongside Joyce feathering his World Matchplay and World Grand Prix chances no end.
At the end of the season, the top 32 players on the PDC European Tour Order of Merit may compete in the European Championship. This event will take place later this year from Oct. 23 to 26 in Dortmund.
ADVERTISEMENT
The International Darts Open in Riesa between April 4-6 is next up on the radar and will see the third tournament of the season on the European Tour concluded no doubt with the likes of Luke Littler and Stephen Bunting back.
Albeit Aspinall will now have a choice on his hands and the same with Joyce and that is whether to attend. 'The Asp' is not shy for picking and choosing especially with his injury travails and also his stacked schedule. While Joyce simply snuck in the back door but will he take his chance to play more. Or will they both do the Gary Anderson and snub the rest of the season knowing their spot is safe.
PDC European Tour Order of Merit
| Rank | Name | Prize money (in units of £1000) |
| 1 | Nathan Aspinall | 30 |
| 2 | Luke Littler | 30 |
| 3 | Mike De Decker | 16 |
| 4 | Ross Smith | 14.5 |
| 5 | Ryan Joyce | 13.25 |
| 6 | Gerwyn Price | 12 |
| 7 | Dave Chisnall | 10 |
| 8 | Gary Anderson | 8.5 |
| 8 | Michael van Gerwen | 8.5 |
| 10 | James Wade | 8.5 |
| 11 | Martin Schindler | 8 |
| 12 | Gian van Veen | 6.5 |
| 12 | Jermaine Wattimena | 6.5 |
| 12 | Michael Smith | 6.5 |
| 12 | Wessel Nijman | 6.5 |
| 16 | Boris Krcmar | 6.5 |
| 16 | Luke Woodhouse | 6.5 |
| 16 | Ritchie Edhouse | 6.5 |
| 19 | Cameron Menzies | 6 |
| 19 | Luke Humphries | 6 |
| 21 | Jonny Clayton | 6 |
| 21 | Stephen Bunting | 6 |
| 23 | Matt Campbell | 5.25 |
| 24 | Ricardo Pietreczko | 5 |
| 24 | Ryan Searle | 5 |
| 26 | Rob Cross | 4 |
| 27 | Damon Heta | 4 |
| 27 | Daryl Gurney | 4 |
| 27 | Dirk van Duijvenbode | 4 |
| 30 | Niko Springer | 3.75 |
| 31 | Krzysztof Ratajski | 2.5 |
| 31 | Mario Vandenbogaerde | 2.5 |
| 33 | Kevin Doets | 2.5 |
| 34 | Andrew Gilding | 2.5 |
| 34 | Ricky Evans | 2.5 |
| 36 | Cam Crabtree | 2.5 |
| 37 | Thibault Tricole | 2.5 |
| 37 | Thomas Lovely | 2.5 |
| 39 | Raymond van Barneveld | 2.5 |
| 40 | Adam Paxton | 1.25 |
| 40 | Andy Boulton | 1.25 |
| 40 | Mickey Mansell | 1.25 |
| 40 | Niels Zonneveld | 1.25 |
| 40 | Robert Grundy | 1.25 |
| 40 | Scott Williams | 1.25 |
| 46 | Karel Sedlacek | 1.25 |
| 46 | Radek Szaganski | 1.25 |
| 46 | Rob Owen | 1.25 |
| 46 | William O'Connor | 1.25 |
| 50 | Adam Hunt | 1.25 |
| 50 | Alan Soutar | 1.25 |
| 50 | Callan Rydz | 1.25 |
| 50 | Connor Scutt | 1.25 |
| 50 | Daniel Klose | 1.25 |
| 50 | Dominik Gruellich | 1.25 |
| 50 | Joe Cullen | 1.25 |
| 50 | Laurin Welk | 1.25 |
| 50 | Marko Kantele | 1.25 |
| 50 | Martin Lukeman | 1.25 |
| 50 | Michael Unterbuchner | 1.25 |
| 50 | Paul Krohne | 1.25 |
| 62 | Cedric Waegemans | 1.25 |
| 62 | Darius Labanauskas | 1.25 |
| 62 | Darryl Pilgrim | 1.25 |
| 62 | Francois Schweyen | 1.25 |
| 62 | James Hurrell | 1.25 |
| 62 | Jim Long | 1.25 |
| 62 | Matthew Dennant | 1.25 |
| 62 | Owen Bates | 1.25 |
| 62 | Patrick De Backer | 1.25 |
| 62 | Sybren Gijbels | 1.25 |
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026