From Phil Taylor’s eleven titles to historic nine-darters: the standout records at the World Grand Prix
PDC
The World Grand Prix has held a special place on the PDC calendar since 1998. The tournament stands out for its unique double-in, double-out format, where every leg must not only finish on a double, but also start on a double.
ADVERTISEMENT
Over more than a quarter of a century, that has produced a string of remarkable records. Phil Taylor dominates much of the record book, but Michael van Gerwen, James Wade, Gian van Veen, and Brendan Dolan have also carved out their place in World Grand Prix history.
Phil Taylor the runaway record champion
Anyone scanning the World Grand Prix roll of honour cannot miss Taylor. “The Power” won the tournament no fewer than eleven times and is by far the most successful player in its history.
Taylor played the event nineteen times and reached eleven finals. Remarkably, he never lost once he had made the title match.
His first title came at the inaugural edition in 1998. Back then the event used a legs format, and Taylor beat Rod Harrington 13-8 in the final. He also lifted the trophy in 1999 and 2000. Only in 2001 did his unbeaten streak at the tournament end.
His eleventh and final World Grand Prix title followed in 2013. Taylor showed once more how dominant he could be at this event. Dave Chisnall did not win a set in the final and was swept 7-0.
Michael van Gerwen, with six titles, is closest to Taylor. James Wade, on two, is the only other player to have won the World Grand Prix more than once.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nobody has won the World Grand Prix more often than Phil Taylor
World Grand Prix titles
| 11 | Phil Taylor |
| 6 | Michael van Gerwen |
| 2 | James Wade |
| 1 | Gerwyn Price |
| 1 | Luke Humphries |
| 1 | Alan Warriner |
| 1 | Colin Lloyd |
| 1 | Robert Thornton |
| 1 | Daryl Gurney |
| 1 | Jonny Clayton |
| 1 | Mike De Decker |
| 1 | Luke Littler |
Only three nine-darters
A perfect leg is special at any PDC tournament, but a nine-darter at the World Grand Prix is even rarer. Across the event’s entire history, only three have been thrown.
ADVERTISEMENT
That is all down to the format. Because a player must open a leg on a double, there are fewer routes to perfection. A nine-darter can only be hit if the first dart lands on double 20, double 17, or the bullseye. Players who routinely start on double 16, for example, cannot finish within nine darts.
Brendan Dolan made history in 2011 as the first player ever to throw a nine-darter in the double-in, double-out format. The Northern Irishman did it in his semi-final against Wade.
Dolan opened the perfect leg with 160, followed it with a maximum 180, and left 161. He took that finish too. The historic feat also earned him his famous nickname, “The History Maker.”
Three years later came a match that remains unique in darts history. On 08.10.2014 Wade and Robert Thornton faced off, and both players hit a nine-darter. Never before, and never since, have both players produced a perfect leg in the same match at the World Grand Prix.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gian van Veen takes down a long-standing record
One of the most recent records belongs to Gian van Veen. Since 2025, the Dutchman holds the highest match average ever recorded at the World Grand Prix.
Before that, the record stood for 24 years and was held by Alan Warriner. The Englishman averaged 106.45 in 2001. Van Veen edged past it in 2025. In his first-round match against Luke Littler he posted a 106.47 average.
Remarkably, Van Veen did not win a set despite his record average. Littler beat him 2-0 and produced an exceptionally high level himself. “The Nuke” averaged 105.58, which ranks third all-time. Together, Van Veen and Littler also hold the highest combined match average in World Grand Prix history.
Most ton-plus averages come in the first round due to the shorter match length. There are notable exceptions. Van Gerwen averaged 103.09 in a four-set quarter-final at the 2016 World Grand Prix. Taylor did something similar in a semi-final against Richie Burnett. “The Power” posted 103.02 and won 5-2.
ADVERTISEMENT
Highest match averages at the World Grand Prix
| Average | Name | Year + round |
| 106.47 | Gian van Veen | 2025, first round |
| 106.45 | Alan Warriner | 2001, first round |
| 105.58 | Luke Littler | 2025, first round |
| 104.86 | Gary Anderson | 2013, first round |
| 104.47 | Michael van Gerwen | 2013, first round |
Van Gerwen just shy of a ton-plus
While several players have posted individual match averages over a hundred, no one has ever won the World Grand Prix with a tournament average of at least 100.
Van Gerwen came extraordinarily close in 2016. The Dutchman recorded match averages of 97.39, 97.17, 103.09, 99.37, and 100.29 across his five matches. That produced a tournament average of 99.97.
ADVERTISEMENT
James Wade just keeps coming back
While Taylor has the most titles, another remarkable longevity record belongs to Wade. No player has started the World Grand Prix more often than “The Machine.”
Wade missed the editions from 1998 through 2004, but has been ever-present since his debut. In 2026, the left-handed Englishman will line up for the 22nd time.
James Wade is competing in the World Grand Prix for the 22nd time in his career
On paper, the World Grand Prix seems tailor-made for Wade. Throughout his career, the Englishman has been renowned for his efficiency on doubles, a quality that becomes even more decisive in the double-in, double-out format.
ADVERTISEMENT
He especially capitalized on that in the first phase of his career. He won the World Grand Prix in 2007 and 2010. In 2014 he reached the final again, but a third title eluded him.
Twenty maximums in a single final
When it comes to 180s, Taylor’s name tops the record books yet again. “The Power” holds the records for the most maximums in a single match and the most 180s across a single World Grand Prix.
Remarkably, both records date back to 1998. That was the only World Grand Prix edition played in a leg format. From the following year, the tournament switched to its signature set format.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
In the final against Harrington, Taylor produced an unprecedented haul of maximums. Across the 21 legs played, he hit a 180 no fewer than twenty times.
Over the entire tournament, Taylor hit 42 maximums that year. That tally has never been bettered.
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026