"I don’t have to make statements anymore, I’m really tired of statements" – Michael van Gerwen fed up of needing to prove a point after Premier League night win
PDC
Michael van Gerwen made an immediate statement on the opening night of the Premier League Darts. In a competition he ended last year disappointingly without a night title, he now pocketed the full haul straight away.
ADVERTISEMENT
Yet there was no exuberant ‘Mighty Mike’ afterwards. No grand gestures, no chest-beating. Van Gerwen stayed strikingly calm, almost matter-of-fact. And that perhaps says everything about his mindset at the start of this long Premier League campaign.
“It’s fine,” Van Gerwen said shortly after his win. “I think I did OK.” It typifies the mindset with which he has started this season. No boasting, no statements — a word he now openly dislikes — but focus on details, moments, and above all: points. Because that, as he repeatedly stressed, is what matters most in the Premier League.
Winning at the right moments
Anyone who watched Van Gerwen on that first night saw that his level wasn’t consistently at the top. He acknowledged that himself. “In some patches my scoring was good, like my game against Gerwyn,” he said. “Whenever I had to put in a good leg with 140, 140, 140, and then afterwards I was poor again.”
But the key, as ever with Van Gerwen, was timing. “Then afterwards I played good again and had the right score at the right moment or a good finish at the right moment,” he explained. “And that’s what you want if you want to win nights like this.”
That is precisely the difference between winning and losing at this level. Van Gerwen didn’t need to dominate every leg. He didn’t have to average spectacularly throughout. What he did do was deliver when it mattered most. “Whenever I had to do well, I did well,” he said simply. “That makes you win games.”
ADVERTISEMENT
That mature approach stands out, especially given the contrast with last year. Then, Van Gerwen went through the Premier League without a nightly win — unheard of for a player who had long been the face of the competition. That he struck immediately this time feels like a correction, even if he refuses to dress it up as such.
No euphoria, just realism
Normally, Van Gerwen is visibly exuberant after a victory. This time he remained notably composed. Asked about his restrained reaction, he pointed to the bigger picture. “There’s still a long way to go,” he said. “We know the Premier League is always a rollercoaster.”
That experience comes through in everything he says. Van Gerwen knows better than anyone how unforgiving this competition can be. “I’ve also been in a position where I won three nights in a row and then afterwards I played poorly,” he reflected. “So I need to make sure I keep my focus and momentum going also towards next week.”
Michael van Gerwen not getting carried away or making any statements.
ADVERTISEMENT
It is the voice of a player who has seen it all — dominance, disappointment, and everything in between. Where he once perhaps thrived on raw emotion, control and self-awareness now take centre stage.
No debate over ‘Dutch number one’
Van Gerwen was also asked about his fight for Dutch number one, particularly with domestic competition increasing. He was quick to shut the discussion down. “I never said that,” he responded. “That’s your words, not my words.”
For Van Gerwen, the equation is simple. “If you want to be the number one in the world, you have to face everything and you have to beat everyone,” he said. “And you have to be the number one of Holland as well.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Still, he played down the label itself. “It’s not really about being Dutch number one, because I’ve been the Dutch number one for a long time,” he added. “And I think maybe I still am.” His focus, he insists, lies elsewhere. “For myself, I need to make sure I just keep winning my games. For the rest, I don’t really care.”
‘I hate the word statement’
Van Gerwen was equally dismissive of suggestions that this opening-night win was a signal to the rest of the field. “I hate the word statement,” he said bluntly. “I don’t have to make statements anymore. I’m really tired of statements.”
That does not mean the hunger is gone. Far from it. “The expectation used to be, when you enter a tournament, Michael van Gerwen will win the tournament,” he said. “Otherwise I’m going to stop playing darts. If I don’t have that expectation or that feeling that I can’t do it anymore, then something is wrong.”
That competitive fire remains unchanged. “You all know me,” he added. “I always give 100 per cent, I never give up and I want to win. Simple as that.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Asked how important it is for his mindset to get a nightly win on the board so early, Van Gerwen again kept things measured. “For my mindset, I don’t think that matters,” he said. “I know I have a good mindset, but it’s always nice to be in front of them instead of chasing them.”
He did acknowledge the contrast with last season. “Last year I had a very crap Premier League, if I can say it that way,” he admitted. “Normally I would use different words, but otherwise I get told off.” The message was unmistakable: this campaign has to be different.
Momentum as the key word
If one concept kept recurring in Van Gerwen’s analysis, it was momentum. “Whenever I had to do well, I did well,” he said. “That makes a win game, simple as that.”
Winning, he believes, is the ultimate remedy. “Winning games is the best medicine for your form and everything,” he explained. “As long as you keep battling your own battles, winning games, you get confidence — and then anything is possible.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Looking ahead: Belgium and packed arenas
Next week brings a new setting, with the Premier League heading to Belgium for the first time. Van Gerwen is curious rather than cautious. “We’re going to see what’s going to happen,” he said. “There are going to be a lot of Dutch people there, I reckon.”
Despite occasional frustrations with the format, the Premier League still holds a special place for him. “I love playing in the Premier League because I love playing in front of big crowds,” he said. “Sometimes I don’t really like the format, because sometimes I think it can get a little bit boring. But for me personally, playing in front of all those thousands of people gives me a lot of joy.”
Mentally, he is not yet at his peak — and he is honest about that. “No, not there yet,” Van Gerwen admitted. “I’m getting there, it takes time. It’s not a sprint, it’s a marathon, mate.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026