"I had two good years in there and then I lost my father and went down the rankings": Mervyn King would never want to take part in Premier League Darts again
PDC
Mervyn King is back on the PDC Tour and determined to prove over the next two years that he can still compete at the highest level. The former world number four reclaimed his Tour Card via Q School and is once again among the top players on the circuit.
ADVERTISEMENT
In an extensive interview with Tungsten Tales, the nearly sixty-year-old veteran spoke candidly about his form, his ambitions, the financial pressure of recent years, and his striking view on the Premier League Darts.
For King, this phase of his career is not primarily about titles or ranking positions, but about rediscovering his old level. He feels his game is coming back, but he is not quite where he wants to be yet.
“I’m not really setting goals,” says King. “I’m trying to do as well as I can. I’ve got personal goals with my game, not as far as winning tournaments are concerned. My personal goals are to play as well as I can, get that throw back, that natural throw where everything feels part of me and you don’t even have to think about it. That’s the first goal. When I can get there, that’s when the 100 averages will come.”
Read also
Fluency in the throw
According to King, the issue lies mainly in the fluency of his throw. Where he was once known for his smooth style, he now notices the occasional small hitch.
“It’s not quite as silky smooth as it used to be. There’s a little bit of jittery and I’m trying to work through that now. If I can throw the dart smooth like I used to, maybe it’s age coming through or trying too hard because I’ve been out, I don’t know. But if I can get back to that nice silky smooth throw without any juddering, snatching or pulling, then the 100 averages will come.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The fact that King is even playing at the highest level again is something he didn’t expect a while ago. Recent years were marked by financial problems and bankruptcy, a period that had a major impact on his career.
“To actually qualify for the Worlds through my ranking and in the Challenge Tour was fantastic. To get my card while going through that was unbelievable. To have that much pressure on my shoulders and to come through the other end victorious on both accounts, qualifying for the Worlds and getting my card back, I wouldn’t have dared believe that at the start. But it happened. So yeah, it’s fantastic.”
Financial breathing room
The financial consequences of that period are still being felt. King admits he now enters the season with less security than before, but tries to keep that off the oche as much as possible.
“I try and leave the thought of money behind, because if you’re playing for money, you’re playing for the wrong reason and it won’t do you any good whatsoever. Yes, we all need money to survive. I could have done with a better start to the season in the Pro Tours than I had, but it is what it is. We’ve played them—I can’t go back and play them again.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Due to the bankruptcy he has less financial reserve than in the past. “Things are tight. Things are very tight because I’ve been relieved of some money through the trustees and the bankruptcy. What I would normally have there as a cover if things didn’t go as well as planned is no longer there. So now I’ve got to fight to win a bit. But I try and leave that at the door. I still want to be the last man standing at a tournament. That’s the main thing for me. And if I do that, then the money will come with it.”
Despite his age, King is nowhere near thinking about quitting. On the contrary, he expects to be on tour for at least two more years, and possibly longer if his form improves further. “At least two years. Some will say that’s great and some won’t. I’m a bit Marmite—I’m not everyone’s cup of tea, but there you go. If I can start finding a bit of form and back to the really good darts again, then I might be around for a little bit longer than two years.”
Read also
One of the veterans on tour
The Englishman is about to turn sixty, but still feels competitive enough to carry on. “In 11 days, I’m 60 years old. I didn’t think I’d even reach 40, to be fair. But 60. If I can carry on playing the way I am and a little bit better, I may still be here at 65. I may be a little bit less consistent nowadays and the form has dropped a little bit, but we can get that back.”
ADVERTISEMENT
A key part of his preparation has always been the mental side, according to King. Visualization plays a big role, something he has done throughout his career. “Visualising myself in my mind lifting that trophy or shaking their hands at the end of the tournament—that’s something I have always done and always believed in. It works. It does work, if you can do it.”
King believes the mental aspect of the game is becoming increasingly important, especially now that young players are breaking through at ever younger ages.
“A lot of them will see the top of the game and they’ll be around for a lot of years, but some of them have got the wrong attitude as well so they’ll disappear. I’ve seen them come and go—he’s the next big thing and two years later you don’t see them anymore.”
He also sees a difference compared to his own generation. “I’m still learning at 60. I’m still learning this game and I’m still learning how to do things. If you think you know everything, you are way wrong.”
Limited affinity with Premier League Darts
ADVERTISEMENT
Finally, King also spoke about the Premier League Darts, the tournament in which he himself was active for two seasons in the past. His opinion about the prestigious event is strikingly candid. “It means more to some players than others. You’ve got players that actually play to get into that because they want it so bad. Others can’t really be bothered with it but they’ll play because they’ve qualified for it or they’ve been asked to.”
His own stint in the competition ended abruptly, something that still sticks with him. “I had two good years in there and then I lost my father and went down the rankings. I’ve been very close to being back in there but they decided not to put me in it again. Fine, that’s their decision.”
When asked if he would ever want to play in the Premier League again, King gives an answer few players would. “If I ever did win the World Championship I wouldn’t play in the Premier League.”
Even when pressed, he does not change his stance. “I’d turn it down… I’d go and watch it, I wouldn’t play in it.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 59visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






