“I probably had the most to lose” – Dennis Priestley reflects on bitter darts split and rivalry with Phil Taylor
PDC
Dennis Priestley was among the players who helped lay the foundations for professional darts as it is known today. The 76-year-old Englishman became a world champion in both the BDO and the organisation that would later become the PDC, witnessing first-hand the bitter split that tore the sport apart in the early 1990s.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speaking to referee Huw Ware on the Tops & Tales podcast, ‘The Menace’ looked back on that turbulent period, the risks he took by joining the breakaway and his long-running rivalry with Phil Taylor.
Priestley’s journey to the top of the world had initially been a gradual one. After spending years playing in pubs, he was selected to represent Yorkshire in 1983. It was approximately another five years before he considered himself good enough to play for England. “Probably somewhere in the region of seven or eight years,” Priestley said. “I think I was first picked for Yorkshire in 1983, and then it was probably another five years before I gradually made it into the England team or became good enough to play for England.”
Just as Priestley had established himself at the very top of the sport, however, the battle over darts’ future erupted. The timing could hardly have been worse for him. “That was one of the things with the split,” he explained. “I was due to be England captain for the whole of 1993, but I never got that honour.”
Read also
“I probably had the most to lose”
Priestley was not simply one of the leading players in the game at the time. He was the world number one and had won the Embassy World Championship in 1991. Two years later, he was supposed to captain England.
“I could be down in the mouth about that period because I probably had the most to lose out of all the 16 players who broke away,” he admitted. “I was world number one at the time and had been picked to captain England, but I never got the chance to do it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The dispute subsequently escalated, with Priestley recalling the enormous pressure placed on the players who had chosen to break away from the BDO. “It was a very trying and testing time, to be fair,” he said. “There was all the talk of taking us to court, suing us and us losing our houses. I think that was more or less what made Mike Gregory go back. There was the pressure of potentially losing his bungalow and perhaps his wife wasn’t fully behind him.”
Priestley never wavered in his own decision, with his wife Jenny offering him her full support. “I always had the full backing of my wife,” he continued. “When a Yorkshireman says he’s going to do something, he’s going to do it. There was never any chance of me going back once we had broken away.”
Sponsorship dispute adds to tensions
One particular source of frustration concerned the players’ ability to display sponsors on their shirts. According to Priestley, an agreement had been reached in advance, only for the BDO to reverse its decision shortly before the 1993 World Championship.
“The managers and sponsors had reached an agreement with the BDO that we could have one sponsor’s patch on our shirts,” he recalled. “Then, when it came to the actual tournament in January 1993, they reneged on the deal. I think Jocky Wilson had to cut part of his playing shirt away to remove the sponsor, while others had black tape put over theirs.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Sponsorship was vital for players who were still attempting to earn a living away from the oche. Even after winning the 1991 Embassy, Priestley was not yet a full-time professional. “I was still an amateur when I came through and won the Embassy in 1991,” he explained. “I think I was ranked 22nd in the world, but I was still working for a living. Any little bit of help from a darts manufacturer, brewery or betting company was always welcome, but they wouldn’t allow us to wear even one badge.”
At the same time, darts was steadily disappearing from television. Priestley remembers approximately 12 televised tournaments being held in 1988, before the schedule was eventually reduced to little more than the World Masters and World Championship.
“You could see that there was definitely a problem,” he said. “The first people to feel that problem were obviously the darts manufacturers. If the sport wasn’t being shown on television, they weren’t selling their products. They knew something was wrong.”
Read also
Turmoil overshadows Priestley’s best form
ADVERTISEMENT
From a sporting perspective, Priestley should have entered the 1993 World Championship at the absolute peak of his powers. His results throughout the previous season had been remarkable and he genuinely believed himself to be the best player in the world.
“The 1993 World Championship was a tournament of turmoil, to be fair,” he said. “If I was ever going to win a second Embassy title, it should have been in 1993. During 1992, I played in 17 tournaments and won 12 or 13 of them. I reached the semi-finals or finals of the others. My form going into January 1993 was the best of my life, but I didn’t win.”
Priestley was unable to reclaim the Embassy crown, but he has no doubt about where he stood in the sport during the preceding year. “In 1992, yes,” he said when asked whether he had considered himself the best player in the world. “I felt that I was the proper world number one.”
The 16 players eventually made their decision during a meeting at the Lakeside Country Club, agreeing that they would go their own way after the World Championship.
“We were having to drag people in off the streets”
ADVERTISEMENT
The new organisation did not enjoy an immediate flying start. The inaugural World Darts Council World Championship, staged at the Circus Tavern in 1994, offered a stark illustration of just how small the breakaway operation remained.
“In the early days, we were having to drag people in off the streets to watch,” Priestley revealed. “We ended up at the Circus Tavern, which was ideal for us at the time because it was small and compact. Even then, we couldn’t fill it during the first few years.”
The tournament featured 24 players and began with a group stage. Priestley and Jocky Wilson were given the honour of contesting the first match in the new World Championship’s history. “The first two visits produced a 140 and a 180, so the quality was definitely there,” Priestley recalled. “It was Jocky who hit the 180, I must add. I scored the 140.”
Priestley grew into the tournament after arriving without a great deal of confidence. By the time he reached the final against Phil Taylor, however, he was producing his best darts of the event.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Historic victory over Taylor
At that stage of their rivalry, Priestley had no reason to fear Taylor. In fact, ‘The Menace’ held the better head-to-head record during their early years at the top. “It was good until around 1994 or 1995 because I was always winning!” he joked when asked what it had been like to face Taylor. “For four or five years, I had the better record against him.”
Priestley raced into a 5-0 lead in the 1994 world final before completing a dominant 6-1 victory. “I didn’t have any baggage at that point from Phil beating me,” he explained. “There was no fear. I suppose I was a little surprised to be 5-0 ahead at the break.”
Having moved within one set of the title, Priestley attempted to simplify the situation by treating it like one of the shorter matches he had played while representing Yorkshire or England.
“I told myself to treat it like playing a best-of-five match for Yorkshire in the county set-up or representing England and to get the job done as quickly as possible,” he said. “Phil came roaring back and won a set, but I put it to bed in the next one. I won the seventh set on double eight.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Priestley thereby became the first world champion crowned by the breakaway organisation, three years after defeating Eric Bristow for the BDO title. “It was double 16 when I beat Eric and double eight when I beat Phil,” he recalled.
Taylor treated darts as his job
The balance of power between the two men subsequently changed. Priestley watched as Taylor adopted an increasingly professional approach and dedicated himself to countless hours on the practice board.
“He began practising more than I did,” Priestley said. “I was getting a little older, while he was maturing as a player and practising far more than any of the rest of us. He treated darts as a job. He often said that if he were still working in the potteries, he would be doing eight-hour shifts, so why shouldn’t he put the same amount of time into playing darts? He was a very good professional.”
Asked whether Taylor’s extraordinary work ethic was a decisive factor in his success, Priestley did not hesitate. “Definitely,” he replied. “He put hours and hours into it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Priestley continued to challenge Taylor for many years. He lost a memorable World Championship final 6-4 in 1996 before suffering a 6-3 defeat the following year. The 1998 final proved considerably more painful, however, as Taylor completed a crushing 6-0 victory.
“I was disgusted,” Priestley admitted. “I couldn’t put my finger on why I missed so much. Obviously, I must have missed a lot of doubles. I think I only won three legs in the entire match. To go from being a top player who was competing with Phil and pushing him all the way to being annihilated was a bit of a shock.”
Dennis Priestley became the first world champion in PDC history
Mental baggage against ‘The Power’
As Taylor’s victories accumulated, Priestley found that the psychological dynamic between them inevitably began to change.
“If you keep getting beaten by the same person, there is bound to be some doubt in your mind,” he acknowledged. “If I had been younger, I might have handled it a little better. Phil is 10 years younger than me. As you get older, your game is obviously not quite as good. As Phil was getting better, I was beginning to drop away.”
Priestley reached one final World Championship final in 2000. Looking back, he believes he might have retired earlier had the prize money available then been comparable to the sums offered in the modern game.
“After winning the Embassy, I told my friends that if I could get 10 years out of the game, I would be satisfied,” he said. “I got those 10 years, but age was catching up with me when I began to fade and encounter different problems.”
Read also
Painful World Matchplay memory
The World Matchplay also holds a significant place in Priestley’s career. He reached the inaugural final at the Winter Gardens in 1994, but surrendered a commanding lead against American Larry Butler after allowing a comment during the interval to disrupt his concentration. “I look back on it with great disgust on my part, to be fair,” Priestley admitted. “I think I was leading 7-2 or 7-3 going into the break. Larry Butler said to me, ‘Dennis, could you have a word with the MC and try to get some order, please?’”
Until then, Priestley had been oblivious to the noise coming from the crowd. “When I was playing my best darts, I couldn’t hear a thing,” he explained. “I was completely focused and didn’t do anything about it. After he had beaten me, I realised that I had heard the crowd throughout the rest of the match. He had planted that seed in my mind and I didn’t get rid of it. It was my own fault. I should never have lost that one.”
Remarkably, that was not Priestley’s first appearance at the Winter Gardens. He had already played there in the Dunlop Classic nine years earlier and won the tournament. “I can tell you the exact date as well,” he said. “It was May 11, 1985.”
The day remained etched in Priestley’s memory for a far more sombre reason. After returning home from his victory and meeting his wife and friends in their local pub, he saw news footage of the Bradford City stadium fire.
“I had been thinking I was the bee’s knees because I had won the Dunlop Classic, but there were people dying,” he recalled. “It brought me straight back down.”
Eyesight problems and changing dartboards
Priestley began experiencing worsening eyesight problems later in his career and underwent laser surgery which, he believes, gave him additional time at the top. He stressed that the procedure had not gone wrong, although its effects gradually began to reverse.
“My eyes had been getting extremely tired and I was suffering from headaches because I was straining so much to concentrate,” Priestley explained. “There were many occasions when I would ask whoever was commentating, ‘Is that in?’ That became one of my famous sayings!”
Priestley also sees a clear difference between the dartboards used during his career and those played on today. The scoring segments have not increased in size, but the thinner wiring has created more room for players to find their targets.
“The dartboards have obviously improved considerably as well,” he concluded. “The trebles aren’t any bigger, but you can see more of them because the wires are so thin. That does contribute to the higher averages we see today.”

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








