"I would be stupid not to": Beau Greaves would take PDC Tour Card, currently 'leaning towards' Ally Pally over Lakeside
PDC
Beau Greaves has confirmed that she will take up a PDC Tour Card if she succeeds in either the Development Tour or Challenge Tour and is currently leaning towards Ally Pally over Lakeside in regards to her World Championship decision.
ADVERTISEMENT
Greaves, a three-time World Champion has given the PDC a real crack this season and at one point led all of the secondary tours. Only really the Challenge Tour that has faltered slightly.
But going into the next part of the season and given that some on the Development Tour who are high up are already on the tour, she could be a full time Tour Card holder from next year.
"I would yeah, I would be stupid not to. You never know when you're going to get that chance again. So I would think I would take it, give it a good two years. In hindsight if I don't get one I'm still able to play absolutely everything so it's a win win," said Greaves to Online Darts.
"I want to have that next part of my game, I have been quite stuck at a level for quite a while so I think getting a Tour Card might push me. I missed Germany for the Challenge Tour which I shouldn't have done looking back but it's life. It gets in the way. The Dev Tour I think I'm still top but just so they are going to be some tight weekends."
Read also
Ally Pally over Lakeside....at the moment
Albeit the one decision that perhaps looms large in terms of uncertainty is always defending Lakeside. With the rules stating you can't play in both, the WDF could face losing their champion.
ADVERTISEMENT
She said though that it never gets easier and that seeing someone else lift that World title is a bit unnerving. But that the addition of more prize money for the first round which has been a factor before and also the lack of benefit to her in regards to winning Lakeside recently means she is swaying towards an Ally Pally return.
Given her status on the Women's Series, it is likely she would get a spot through that route for sure with the others less cut and dry. But also she leaves the choice open and said that she could decide the other way in the next few months.
"I'm like a broken record constantly saying I don't know or I don't know what to choose. It's a tough decision. But I will say the last two times I've won at Lakeside, they haven't really benefited me in any way.
"They have but they haven't as much as it would if I won a game at Ally Pally. It's two completely different things. If I look back I think it maybe hasn't done me as much as I thought it would but obviously to me I don't care about what anyone else says I wanted the World titles and I got them."
"I've got three now. It all comes back to how much confidence I've got if I want to try and give Ally Pally another go. At the minute I'm leaning towards it because the WDF hasn't got the comps to be playing in there. I have been playing all PDC and loving it. But saying all that I could get to the decision and choose Lakeside so it really just depends."
ADVERTISEMENT
"I want to be a top player I want to at least try to be. I think I'd be a fool not to push myself to the next level. I think it's just the anxiety which holds me back."
Beau Greaves has become more of a PDC fixture in 2025 and wants to become a top player.
She has also tasted ProTour life this year through the Challenge Tour but has said that the times she has snubbed the call-up has been down to circumstances and that she is still doing it on her own terms. Despite admitting she should perhaps give herself more of an opportunity.
"I haven't played perhaps as much as I should've done but it's just preference. I'm playing quite a bit and I try and balance it well. I should push myself a bit more and I don't and that's on me no-one else."
"They just end up being at bad times. I'm away and then I get called up and I haven't booked on to stay. I think would I play or rather go home and I always think I'd rather go home. Not having a Tour Card I don't really have the need to build the money up and win the games so it's a bit different for me than it is for other players. They're nice to play when I get the chance and I want to."
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Struggling with dartitis in the past and opening up about her struggles recently with anxiety leading to issues on the ProTour, she said it's an ongoing battle.
"It's probably a bit lower than it should be but I seem to be playing well but not feeling good when I'm playing. I think obviously I've been struggling recently but not crazy amounts. I'm very used to that though, I can deal with it really well. It's a bit like Nathan (Aspinall).
"He obviously struggles and I think we both sort of do the same thing and try to get on with it. But you're still trying to play at a high level at the same time. That's when it gets a bit tough. Sometimes I play great and I come off and feel terrible."
Sherrock and being invited to exhibitions
ADVERTISEMENT
She spoke in this interview at the MDA/MODUS Armageddon event in Leicester and faced Fallon Sherrock on the stage.
Greaves admitted to slightly having imposter syndrome about it saying that despite being a perennial winner, she sometimes doesn't think she deserves it.
"It's nice just to play on the stage. We play a lot on the floor and it's not the same. It's nice to have a bit of fun and a bit of freedom to play. I think we both respect each other as we're fairly decent. It's what you want to see from the ladies. I think we both want more for the ladies."
"I go up and down in confidence all the time but nights like this, it's just nice to take the edge off a little bit and play with freedom and relax. Also to play someone like Fallon will help me ten fold. Even though I've won so much I feel like I'm not good enough, as stupid as it sounds. It's a strange one."
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026




