"If they click and things go smoothly, then it's probably the best Dutch pairing available" – Van der Voort touts Netherlands for title challenge against England
PDC
The World Cup of Darts is just around the corner, and according to Vincent van der Voort that means one of the most special weeks of the darts year. In the podcast Darts Draait Door, the former professional darter looked extensively ahead to the nation-based tournament in Frankfurt, where not only the world’s elite will be in action, but dozens of lesser-known darting nations will also get the chance to showcase themselves on the big stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort believes it is precisely that international character that makes the World Cup so appealing. “As we said the other day, it's a cult tournament. You get to see all kinds of unusual countries, unusual players, and from Saturday onwards it really starts to feel serious,” he said enthusiastically. He also notes that the level of the smaller darts nations has clearly risen in recent years. “If you look back at the first World Cups, it was mainly the traditional darting nations. Now there are many more countries involved, and increasingly we're seeing good players emerge from all over the world.”
Van der Voort expects several of the smaller darts nations to spring surprises. He mentioned the Philippines, Spain, Poland, and the Czech Republic as teams the established names would rather avoid in the draw.
He was particularly positive about Spain. With José Justicia and Cristo Reyes, the country has a dangerous duo in his view. “Justicia is a quality player and, together with Reyes, they form a partnership that nobody will want to face.” Poland also impresses the Dutchman. The form of Krzysztof Ratajski and Sebastian Białecki especially makes him optimistic. “Krzysztof Ratajski remains a very experienced, high-quality player, and Sebastian Białecki is in excellent form. That's definitely a country that other teams should be wary of."
Read also
German concerns over Pietreczko
One of the most talked-about teams in Frankfurt is Germany. Not because of Martin Schindler, but because of Ricardo Pietreczko, who in recent weeks has visibly struggled with his game due to dartitis.
Van der Voort thinks that will make the group stage particularly tricky for Germany. “They are going there with someone who is struggling. And Schindler isn't in a phase where one great result follows another either.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He sees another factor at play. “Normally you're only concerned with your own game, but now Schindler also has to deal with his partner's situation.” With the Philippines and New Zealand in the same group, Van der Voort does not expect an easy opening phase for the Germans.

Ricardo Pietreczko has been struggling with dartitis for some time
The big question: Van Gerwen and Van Veen
Naturally, a large part of the podcast focused on the Dutch team. Michael van Gerwen and Gian van Veen will form the Oranje duo at the World Cup for the first time. Van der Voort believes the key lies mainly in their chemistry. “If they click and things go smoothly, then it's probably the best Dutch pairing available.”
At the same time, he realises both players prepare in completely different ways. “I think they'll practise together at times, but Gian will probably arrive earlier than Michael and that's perfectly fine. Everyone should stick to their own routine. It's not like Michael and Gian never practise together. They do. They can play a few games together if they want, but they should mostly leave each other to prepare in their own way."
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort does not expect Van Gerwen and Van Veen to force doing everything together. “Each player knows what works best for him. It shouldn't become: 'Come on, let's practise together now,' or 'We have to walk to the venue together' or 'Let's set up finishes for each other and practise doubles together.' That's not how it should work."
On form, perhaps different choices
Strikingly, Van der Voort also said that, purely based on current form, he might select different players for Team Netherlands. “Based purely on current form? Wessel Nijman and Kevin Doets..”
Yet he immediately stressed that experience at a tournament like the World Cup remains invaluable. “Michael van Gerwen still has it in him. He didn't win the Nordic Darts Masters by accident. The quality is still there, but the drop-off is often quite large.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Northern Ireland and England biggest threats
While many automatically look to England as the biggest favourite, Van der Voort also sees defending champions Northern Ireland as a huge threat.
He was full of praise for the duo Josh Rock and Daryl Gurney. “I know Daryl Gurney will always give 100 percent, and naturally they'll want to defend their title. I think it's simply a very good pairing, and whoever beats them will have done well."
Even so, England remains the team to beat for him. Luke Humphries and Luke Littler have a level that hardly anyone can match, in his view. “I think both of them probably learned a lot from that Premier League final as well—the way they played against each other, the level they reached. If they get anywhere near that level, the rest of the field might as well pack up and go home.”

Luke Littler and Luke Humphries are the favourites to win the World Cup for England
ADVERTISEMENT
The Netherlands should not fear anyone
Despite all the praise for England and Northern Ireland, Van der Voort sees plenty of opportunities for the Netherlands. In fact, he thinks Van Gerwen and Van Veen can beat any team when they hit their best level.
“If you want to beat England in the final, you'll need Van Veen's World Championship form and Van Gerwen's peak level that he still shows from time to time.".”
The former UK Open finalist therefore expects the Netherlands to go deep. “It's difficult to predict because you don't know how the draw will fall after the group stage. But I'd say England versus the Netherlands in the final. And from a Dutch perspective, let's hope that happens."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







