"If you're a top player, behave like a top player" - Barry Hearn offers daunting warning to top players skipping tournaments
PDC
Prize money has been a huge talking point in darts since it got increased in tournaments. This now offers players a great opportunity to make it big in darts. While this is the case, withdrawals in tournaments are still proving to be a huge noticeable factor among the top players in the world. In an interview with Online Darts, Hearn spoke up on these problems while also indicating the warning signs if they are to miss too many events.
ADVERTISEMENT
Hearn credited himself with the system in place as he sends out a stark warning for the players if they do not compete regularly. "To be honest with you, I'm such a fan of the overall system, and I'm going to take all the credit for it. Of course, it wasn't just me. I like the idea, and people can criticise lots of things. They do in lots of our sports," he admitted.
"But the idea of your ranking list being built on prize money means that if you miss too many events, your ranking is going to go down. We've seen that accelerate with the increased prize money. You'll get more volatility in the rankings."
He ticked off some examples. "So people that you thought were going to be safe for five years, you don't know. We put names to it because it doesn't matter. They know. They see the evidence. Peter Wright, Michael Smith, people that have had problems with injury or whatever, you can dive down, which means you've got to make the most of every opportunity. Which means you don't tend, sensibly, to miss too many events."
Read also
It is also a boost for other players on the PDC Tour. "We've had a few players that have missed a few events and suddenly realised, 'Nathan Aspinall, well, crikey, is he going to qualify for this or that?' And he's a top player. So I don't want to lose top players, but I think the system is so good that it actually encourages other people. So when I see a few big names not in a Pro Tour event, I'm genuinely quietly happy."
The Players Championship events specifically have seen some big withdrawals as of late from many of the top players. Hearn continues to dismiss this. "One, we don't sell tickets. Two, it's a complete meritocracy, which I love. It's about ability, not about talk. It's about what you do on the oche. And when I see those big names, I love it because, as you know, I still alter my rankings.
Every win earned is a boost in the rankings. "You see someone get £15,000, which is not a fortune in today's darts world, but it's enough to put you up a few more places."
ADVERTISEMENT
They soon get to reap the reward. "Ultimately, it takes a bit of time, but all of a sudden they're qualifying for the World Grand Prix," he stated. "They're qualifying for, you know, certain players are qualifying for the World Matchplay. Players that you didn't expect."

Barry Hearn is the founder and president of Matchroom Sport
Focusing on the European Tour
Hearn did admit that there were problems that needed to be solved on the European Tour. Not all the competitions are participated by the best players in the world, with the likes of Luke Littler, Luke Humphries and Gerwyn Price not featuring in many of them.
"That is an issue. And part of the addressing will be increasing prize money," Hearn said. "Because at the end of the day, that's the first thing they look at. You know, I think we've got it just about right. If you're an invited player, effectively one of the top seeds, if you don't win your first game, you get paid, but it doesn't count towards your rankings. That's good. That's really good because it means you're under scrutiny. When you see other players that are in that top 16 pull out, that's not good, because they're not justifying the system that's given them the opportunity in the first place."
ADVERTISEMENT
With darts so busy when at the top, some players are forced to pick and choose specific tournaments to skip. Especially the Premier League Darts players who are regularly travelling around competing. "If you're a top professional, part of being a top professional is organising your diary yourself," Hearn continued. And by all means, it can be to suit you because no one forces you to play.
"What we do want is the credibility of the event not being affected. If a player feels it's not worth his while, but I don't want to see someone pulling out and then appearing in an exhibition on the same night because he got more money than the first-round losers."
Read also
Close to getting the system right
Hearn stressed that they were losing 'millions' holding these tournaments as they tried to get darts into the limelight. "We've got to produce a great programme because the European Tour, when we started the European Tour, was costing us millions a year in losses. Millions a year. The Pro Tour, for example, is a humongous operation. I don't know what it costs us—£5 million a year?"
ADVERTISEMENT
He used the talented Beau Greaves as an example. "If we want to encourage youngsters, look at Beau Greaves on the Pro Tour. She nearly knocked my teeth out the other day. She won on the Pro Tour. I'm like, 'Now, what did that mean to me?' It justifies the Pro Tour. It justifies the system. And hopefully, with Beau Greaves, who I think is an exceptional talent, she thinks, "Blimey, I don't believe I could ever, in my dreams, win the Pro Tour." And then she'll go and have a run, and she's qualified for the next couple of European Tours as well. And suddenly you're looking at the ranking list. She's getting out there."

Beau Greaves is attracting numerous fans to the sport
The trajectory of these costs and the profit made is a much healthier look now. With the prize money up for grabs, Hearn has insisted that players need to be regularly participating. "Now, people have either got to have the ability to take that or ignore it. But only an idiot will ignore changing your life and the type of money we're talking about," he commented.
"So we're not far away from having it dead right. I think the players have got... And I think most of the players do. They continually buy into it. You know, you'll always have a player that says, 'I don't fancy it,' or, 'The wife wants to go out this weekend.' All right, we'll make sure that we've got plenty of notice. Someone else is going to get their chance."
Risk of not competing highlighted
ADVERTISEMENT
If you do not compete, the danger lies in the form of missing out in the top events. "The way you motivate them is you pay them more money. And if they want to miss out, they run the risk of slipping down those rankings. And before you know it, you won't be qualifying for the World Matchplay, the Grand Prix, the Grand Slam. And maybe, because the competition is so intense, you'll be struggling in a couple of years for a Tour Card.
"But if someone starts pulling out of events, don't hold your breath to get invited to the World Series. If you're a top player, behave like a top player. You've got to give back as well as take. And that's the way it will be."
Read also
Hearn also emphasised how tough the ProTour was. "So I think it's fabulous because I didn't expect to say after the World Matchplay, 'I'm going to have to, out of his words, play in some Pro Tours.' Now, all of a sudden, we've got another narrative."
This is focusing on Luke Littler who needs to amass a good chunk of change if he is going to qualify for the Players Championship Finals. He has given himself four events to do so, but it poses a difficult challenge.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Pro Tour, top 64, which I think should be extended myself. But anyway, another year," he hinted. "About £30,000 now to be in the top 64. Look at the [stakes] on that—nothing. Those four events, do you know how tough that's going to be? He's got to really win two out of four Pro Tours. Listen, the kid's a great player. He's only won four in his career. And they're tough to win. They're tough to win, those early games, when someone gets off to a flyer and he goes 4-0 up because of your two breaks of throw."

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








