"I'm not quite sure what happened there" - Controversy and confusion cloud Luke Humphries' 2nd round win in Basel
PDCWorld number one Luke Humphries marched into the third round of the Swiss Darts Trophy with a 6-2 victory over Callan Rydz, but his win was marked not just by brilliance on the doubles, but also by a bizarre scoring controversy that briefly unsettled the Basel crowd.
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries won half of his six legs with ton-plus checkouts, showcasing the kind of ruthless finishing that has defined his rise to the top. His first big blow came on a 117 finish, punishing Rydz after the Bedlington ace had missed four darts at double 11. Soon after, a 108 checkout stretched his lead, with “Cool Hand Luke” nailing five doubles from his first five attempts.
While perfection at the outer ring couldn’t last forever, Humphries finished in style, landing a superb 136 to close out the contest. The numbers underlined his dominance: a 100.13 average compared to Rydz’s 86.65, three ton-plus finishes, and an 85.7% checkout rate (6/7) that Rydz’s 18.2% (2/11) never came close to matching.
Read also
Scoring mix-up sparks confusion
The only blemish in Humphries’ night came in the sixth leg, when confusion over the scoring briefly overshadowed proceedings. Humphries himself admitted he wasn’t entirely sure what had happened.
“The most important thing was… was I right on the score I thought was wrong? To be fair, I’m not quite sure what happened there. They put 61 down, but I think I scored 97. We’ll find out afterwards. I hope I’m not wrong, but I thought I hit a treble.”
Despite the incident, he regrouped quickly and never let Rydz back into the match.
ADVERTISEMENT
A new version of Humphries
Perhaps the most striking admission from Humphries afterwards wasn’t about Basel at all, but his throw. The world number one revealed he has made significant technical changes in search of improvement.
“I’ve changed my throw a little bit. I did it last week. I don’t flick them anymore, I push them through now. I feel so good, I feel like a different person, like there’s a different version of me. I said in the World Series Finals with Phil Barrs that I had to change something to get better — and I feel really, really good.”
Even so, he acknowledged it will take time to fully bed in. “It’s frustrating when the darts don’t go in. I guess I have to adapt, it takes time. But considering I didn’t feel like I played that great there, a 100 average was good.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Embracing Europe
If the throw is still a work in progress, the setting certainly isn’t. Humphries was once again buoyed by a lively European Tour crowd, who were quick to create new chants in his honour. “It’s new, isn’t it? They’re trying to match Prague! But honestly, I love playing on the European Tour. I feel like I get so much support, and they respect me so much. These crowds… I love being up here. That’s why I think I play my best darts here.”
He also spoke about his “very Swiss” experience the previous day, playing darts on the Jungfraujoch — the so-called “Top of Europe.” “It was a great experience. Really tough up there, it was incredibly cold. But I was the only player to hit a 180, about 12,000 feet above sea level, so that was really cool. It’s something I’ll remember for the rest of my life. Switzerland is a beautiful country — honestly one of the most beautiful I’ve ever seen.”
Looking ahead
ADVERTISEMENT
For Humphries, the message was clear: the changes to his throw are beginning to pay off, his finishing remains world class, and with the Basel crowd firmly behind him, he looks a strong favourite to go deep in Switzerland.
Callan Rydz may have been left to rue his missed doubles, but for Humphries, it was another demonstration of why he’s the number one player in the world — even on a night when, by his own admission, he didn’t feel at his best.
Read also
CLINICAL COOL HAND! 👏
— PDC Darts (@OfficialPDC) September 27, 2025
Luke Humphries races through to Round Three at the Swiss Darts Trophy, taking out a brilliant 136 finish to wrap up a 6-2 victory over Callan Rydz!
The world number one with a statement display in Switzerland!
📺 https://t.co/YyBPPwoMK8 #ET13 | R2 pic.twitter.com/iIh5QH4IBp

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






