From social media sparring to working on ITV as Chris Mason finally works with Wayne Mardle: "Was I surprised it worked? No, Was I surprised by the amount of love it got? Yes"
PDC
For all the noise that has surrounded ITV’s darts coverage over the winter, few voices carry the weight of Chris Mason’s. Not because he is new to the sport’s evolving broadcast landscape, but precisely because he is not.
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason is one of the rare figures to have lived both versions of ITV darts. He was a familiar presence during the previous era fronted by Jacqui Oatley and long-standing pundit Alan Warriner-Little, and he is now one of the constants to carry through into a refreshed on-screen team alongside Wayne Mardle, Mark Webster and presenter Pete Graves.
That vantage point makes his assessment of ITV’s new look especially revealing. Speaking in conversation with Online Darts, Mason did not hedge his words. “For me, it was some of the best darts TV I’ve ever seen.”
It is a striking endorsement not just of a single tournament, but of a broader production shift that has coincided with increased Matchroom influence behind the scenes and a more modernised broadcast approach.
Read also
A visible shift in production culture
Mason’s praise is rooted in process as much as presentation. He described a level of preparation he had not previously experienced on ITV coverage, underlining how the tone was set long before the first dart was thrown. “I’ve never done as much rehearsal for an event as I did for this one.”
That attention to detail, he explained, extended across the entire production team. “Every cameraman, every sound engineer, every bit of talent, even the markers – no stone was left unturned.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason recalled a production environment where assumptions were deliberately stripped away. “The production executive basically said, ‘I don’t care if you think you know what you’re doing. We’re not getting this wrong.’”
For a broadcaster undergoing transition, those words speak to a cultural reset as much as a technical one. Rather than simply refreshing faces on screen, the coverage was rebuilt around structure, rehearsal and clarity.

The former ITV Darts team where Mason was joined by Jacqui Oatley and Alan Warriner-Little
The Matchroom influence
While Mason was careful not to draw explicit comparisons with previous ITV setups, he did acknowledge where some of that shift appeared to originate. In particular, he pointed to Matchroom’s wider experience in televised sport.
ADVERTISEMENT
“When you look at what Matchroom have been doing in Saudi Arabia with boxing production, you can see how that experience filtered into darts.”
That crossover, he suggested, helped unlock new possibilities for a sport that has often wrestled with how best to balance accessibility and spectacle. “Someone clearly looked at that and thought, ‘We can do something with darts here,’ and they absolutely nailed it.”
The result, in Mason’s view, was coverage that felt more inclusive to viewers dropping in mid-session, without alienating those steeped in the sport. “Not everyone knows everything about darts. Some people are coming home from work and suddenly they’re dropped into a match halfway through. We explained what had happened and why it mattered.”
Read also
A new blend of voices
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the most obvious flashpoints in the wider reaction to ITV’s overhaul has been the changing composition of its broadcast team. Mason acknowledged that uncertainty himself, admitting he was not convinced from the outset that the different styles would seamlessly combine.
“I wasn’t sure how all the styles would blend. Wayne has his style, I have mine. Webby has his. Mark Wilson is a proper broadcaster, very structured. And then there’s Dan, who is just a genius.”
The balance, he felt, ultimately came from clearly defined roles rather than forced uniformity. “Mark brought calm and structure. He wouldn’t let things drift too far.”
Working alongside Mardle in particular felt natural, built on decades of shared experience rather than rehearsed chemistry. “Wayne and I have known each other for over 30 years. The way we talk on comms is exactly how we talk in the press room watching darts.”
What did surprise him was the scale of the response. “Was I surprised it worked? No. Was I surprised by the amount of love it got? Yes.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason said feedback from within the television industry itself had been especially striking. “I’ve never had so much positive feedback from people inside the TV industry saying how involved they felt in the broadcast.”

Mardle (L) and Webster (R) join Mason on the new ITV coverage
Fallout, backlash and restraint
That enthusiasm has not existed in a vacuum. The reshaped ITV line-up prompted visible frustration from figures who did not carry over into the new era, with Warriner-Little among those to publicly express disappointment at how changes were handled. Some viewers, too, questioned whether ITV’s coverage was losing its established identity in favour of something closer to a Matchroom house style.
Mason did not address individual grievances, but he did acknowledge the intensity of reaction around elements of the presentation itself, particularly graphics and on-screen design. “The score graphic became divisive, which amazed me.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He was clear that criticism should not lose sight of broader considerations. “People forget there are visually impaired fans. Darts is one of the few sports they can follow easily. The outrage over the graphics, over the MC – it was just unnecessary. Be kind.”
The measured tone reflects Mason’s unusual position in this debate. Having worked closely with the previous ITV team, and now embraced the new structure, his comments validate the direction of travel without dismissing the past.
Read also
The Winmau World Masters as a statement event
If there was a single moment that crystallised the shift for viewers, it was the Winmau World Masters, which doubled as both a high-profile tournament and a showcase for the revamped broadcast.
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason highlighted not only the production values, but the equipment itself, pointing to the introduction of the new Winmau board. “That board isn’t designed for aggressive points. It’s had thousands of hours of research and development.”
The impact, he argued, was visible in the numbers. “Look at the averages produced since it’s been used.”
For Mason, the conclusion was simple. “The proof is in the pudding. The tournament was incredible.”
A verdict shaped by perspective
In a period of transition, ITV darts has inevitably prompted debate about what has been gained and what has been lost. Mason’s perspective does not erase that tension, but it does offer context.
ADVERTISEMENT
He has experienced the rhythms of the old setup, built relationships within it, and now finds himself endorsing a new approach that places rehearsal, clarity and modern production at its core. That combination of continuity and change is precisely why his verdict resonates.
When Mason says it was some of the best darts television he has ever seen, it is not the enthusiasm of a newcomer speaking. It is the considered judgement of someone who has seen both sides of ITV darts, and who believes the sport has taken a significant step forward on screen.
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 102visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







