"It’s a made-up word, It’s not something anybody really has, it’s fake": Luke Humphries defends responding to influencer claiming lack of 'stage aura' and giving in to Littler
PDC
Luke Humphries insists he is “not up there to have aura” after responding to criticism from darts influencer now also pundit Charlie Murphy, admitting the comments left him “really disappointed” despite progressing at the Belgian Darts Open.
ADVERTISEMENT
The world number one spoke candidly following his 6–4 victory over Dirk van Duijvenbode at the Belgian Darts Open, but much of the attention centred on a social media exchange sparked earlier in the day which caused debate.
“I’m not up there to have aura”
Humphries had reacted on X after Murphy questioned his confidence and suggested he was “giving in” to Luke Littler, as well as claiming he lacked “stage aura”. Asked about the situation in a separate interview with Tungsten Tales, Humphries admitted the comments affected him more than expected. “I didn’t actually read it at first, but then I clicked on the post and it made me feel even worse, to be honest,” he said.
“There was stuff about me having ‘no aura’, I don’t really care about having aura. I’m not up there to have aura, I’m up there to win darts matches, to win money, to set my family up. I don’t need to be up there having this… I mean, what even is aura? It’s a made-up word. It’s not something anybody really has, it’s fake.”
Read also
“It’s more the disrespect”
While Humphries insisted criticism of his ranking does not bother him, he made clear the tone of the comments was what stung. “I found out it was Charlie Murphy, and that was quite disappointing because I’ve always got on really well with him,” he said. "It’s not that words hurt you, it’s more the disrespect. That was the disappointing part for me, because it’s someone I’ve gotten on with really well for many years.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I don’t really care if people say I’m not the second-best player in the world anymore, that’s fine. It was more the way he said I ‘give in’ to Luke Littler. I never give in to Luke. He’s just a bloody good dart player. It’s not like players give in to him, he’s just really good and really hard to beat.”
Humphries pointed to his recent record against Littler as evidence. “In the last three games I’ve played him, they’ve all gone to a last-leg or last-set decider and I’ve pushed him all the way. I’m one of the only players really doing that. Gerwyn Price is doing it as well but hasn’t quite got over the line, I have.”
I'm not up there to have aura - Luke Humphries.
“Sometimes you just react”
The 2024 world champion acknowledged he may have been better off ignoring the comments, but admitted the nature of elite sport makes that difficult. “A lot of people will see it and just take it in, but when you’re in this sport, you get it all the time and it can annoy you, it really does,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Most of the people commenting wouldn’t like it themselves. It’s something I probably could have ignored, but sometimes you just react, you have a little fuse and can’t help it. It wasn’t really about being called number two, it was about people saying I give in or don’t try. I’m trying my best out there, really trying to push him. Not many players are actually pushing him, and I am, so I’m just doing my best.”
Murphy who started life as a darts influencer before moving into punditry roles also later issued a public apology, stating his remarks had been taken out of context and that “no disrespect in any form was meant” as well amid comments made to OLBG which were then circulated and responded to by Humphries.
“Not even out of second gear”
The off-stage controversy came after Humphries booked his place on the final day with a hard-fought win over Van Duijvenbode, a match he described as “strange” on stage with Master of Ceremonies Philip Brzezinski. “To be fair to Dirk, he did come back really well there,” Humphries said. "It’s kind of a strange period for me as a player at the moment. I’m hitting 100 averages, but I feel like there’s so much more to give, and it’s just not coming out. I’m not really worried about it. If you’re averaging 89, then you’ve got a chance to worry. But I’m still hitting 100 averages, so it’s fine. It feels like I’m not even out of second gear, so there’s something there that’s going to come out of me soon.”
Humphries raced into a 4–0 and 5–1 lead before being pegged back, something he attributed to inconsistencies in his own performance. “I didn’t expect to be 4–0 or 5–1 up. Dirk’s a classy player, but I felt some nerves from him, he was pushing his darts a bit,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
“For me, it felt quite smooth at the start, and then it got a little bit worse as the game went on. That’s probably a good example of my game at the moment, the first half just isn’t good enough. If I get that first half right, I’ll be hitting bigger averages and putting in better performances. But credit to Dirk for coming back, and I’m happy I managed to close it out in the end.”
😠 Luke Humphries ADAMANT in defending himself against comments from YouTuber claiming he has no aura and 'gives in' to Luke Littler.
— Tungsten Tales Darts (@Tungsten_Tales) March 21, 2026
"I clicked on the post and it made me feel even worse. All this stuff about not having aura and stuff I don't really care about having aura.… pic.twitter.com/7MtzNeU30Q

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026





