International Darts Open Friday Evening Round-up | Cross and Cullen win last-leg deciders, Chisnall scrapes through as Manby excels on debut
PDCThe action continued at the International Darts Open with another
eight first round ties fiercely competed. Former world champion Rob Cross was
one of those headlining, and he played his part in a thriller against Dirk van
Duijvenbode in the standout first round tie. He won 6-5 in a match which stayed
on throw throughout the duration.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cross only got into the tournament due to world number two
Luke Humphries withdrawing. He was desperate for money to add to his ranking as
the World Matchplay loomed perilously. After two very comfortable holds, van
Duijvenbode had a brace of efforts to secure a first break but was not able to
take out 92. Cross was then looming on 60 before ‘The Aubergenius’ took out 76
on double 18 to prolong the holds. Both players missed a double for a ton+
checkout – van Duijvenbode on double 16 for a 108 and Cross double 18 for a
121.
The score was deadlock at 4-4 after van Duijvenbode’s dart
just stayed in the bull segment for a 127 finish. Van Duijvenbode’s frustrations
started to boil over. He was gesturing to someone who whistled in the crowd
after a fifth dart to break in the ninth leg was missed as Cross was let off the
hook. However, these frustrations turned into fuel with some big scoring that
led to a 104 checkout. The trend continued in the final leg as van Duijvenbode
was unable to mount any challenge on the Cross throw, leaving the stage seething
as Cross kept himself with his competitors fighting for Blackpool.
The Matchplay conundrum was the same for others. It was not
a convincing performance by Dave Chisnall, ‘rubbish’ in his words. Nevertheless,
he was fortunate to come up against an under-performing Liam Maendl-Lawrance. Chisnall
won six of the last seven legs to secure safe passageway into the second round
with a 6-3 win.

Dave Chisnall was not at his best, but managed to book his spot in round two of the International Darts Open
After the first three legs, both players were averaging under
80. Maendl-Lawrance had broken the throw, but a 14-dart hold got ‘Chizzy’ on
the board. The German got himself back ahead with a 16-dart break on double two
once more. Two breaks occurred following this before Chisnall took out a
brilliant 138 outshot. More missed doubles saw both players sat in the madhouse.
Chisnall pinned it to go one away and out of nowhere took out 110 on double 18
for a fine ending. He stays in 20th in the PDC Order of Merit in the
race to Blackpool but there is a fine chance of building on that in Riesa.
| Dirk van Duijvenbode | VS | Rob Cross |
|---|---|---|
| 99.18 | Average (3 Darts) | 95.13 |
| 11 | 100+ Thrown | 6 |
| 7 | 140+ Thrown | 8 |
| 4 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 127 | Highest Checkout | 80 |
| 2 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 31.25 | Checkout percentage | 37.5 |
| 5 / 13 | Checkout | 3 / 13 |
Doets excels as Manby wins on debut
ADVERTISEMENT
Kevin Doets very much enjoyed his first visit to the
International Darts Open. He had a tricky customer in the form of Tom Bissell
who was bypassed with an eye-catching 6-0 win with ‘Hawkeye’ boasting a 102.48
average while missing one double.
Read also
Doets hit a 180 in all of the first three legs, missing one
double and punishing missed opportunities by Bissell to sail 3-0 clear. Two
breaks of throw were mixed in there, giving Bissell a mountain to climb. ‘The
Bizzness’ job was made tougher after missing a dart for a 61 checkout. Seemingly
inevitably, 70 went in two and Doets powered even further clear.
While maybe not as comfortable for Charlie Manby on paper, a
6-3 win flattered a hugely underwhelming Niko Spriner. The 20-year-old had previously
played Springer twice and lost both 4-0. On his Euro Tour debut, he continued
to live up to the hype with a very convincing performance.
Springer started poorly. Manby quickly settled into the
environment, not bothered by the German crowd who were witnessing their player
fall to a 3-0 lead. Springer needed a spark and felt like he got it at with a
92 checkout utilising the double 18 segment twice. After Manby restored his
three-leg cushion with an 11-darter, Springer wired the bull for a 170 outshot.
He did not need to go for it, but it would not bite him back as he nailed double
four. Manby moved one away from the win before missing a first match dart. The
German’s 112 checkout was the final noticeable thing he did before ‘Champagne’
got the job done and dusted, passionately celebrating a maiden success on the
Euro Tour.
ADVERTISEMENT
Charlie Manby has won his first match on the Euro Tour
| Niko Springer | VS | Charlie Manby |
|---|---|---|
| 82.27 | Average (3 Darts) | 94.94 |
| 9 | 100+ Thrown | 7 |
| 3 | 140+ Thrown | 6 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 3 |
| 112 | Highest Checkout | 85 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 60 | Checkout percentage | 37.5 |
| 3 / 5 | Checkout | 5 / 13 |
O’Connor and Cullen edge tight contests
2020 champion Joe Cullen was tested in a tight clash against
Chris Landman. It went the distance but was played at a very fast pace as decisive
breaks and doubles went the way of Cullen as he won 6-5.
After three very comfortable holds, Cullen had the first dart
to break. Not only did he miss double 16 for a 64 checkout, but Landman came
back in the next leg and took that out on tops for a break of his own. ‘The
Rockstar’ pinned double four and was level instantly. Missed doubles by Cullen
followed and were subsequently punished by ‘The Countryman’ who went 5-3 to the
good. Landman’s thoughts of a last-leg decider were premature when he mistakenly
fist pumped Cullen after the former Masters champion held. An 11th
leg would come after Cullen took out a clutch 112 checkout. He almost backed it
with a 125 checkout before returning for tops to culminate an entertaining
match.
ADVERTISEMENT
William O’Connor has never got past the last-32 stage in Riesa.
He has the chance to break new ground tomorrow against Wessel Nijman after
averaging over 95 in a very good 6-2 win over Paul Krohne.
Read also
O’Connor found himself around 200 points behind in the first
leg when Krohne was on double six but somehow won the leg for a break. He then
teased the nine-darter with seven perfect darts but could only finish in 13. A
110 checkout followed and ‘The Magpie’ had a break lead. Krohne prevented the
whitewash but could not make it back-to-back as O’Connor moved one away. He
missed a match dart for a 120 checkout, but did not make the same mistake on
the bull for a 121 to seal a very commendable victory.
Krzysztof Ratajski and Cristo Reyes did not produce their
best performances, but it was ‘The Polish Eagle’ who was the slightly more
clinical on the outer ring, taking his chances to prevail 6-4.
The match began with four breaks of throw, which was
followed by four holds. Ratajski started in style with a 126 outshot before
Reyes got back level. The Spaniard took a 3-2 lead after holding for the first time
and possibly should have moved 5-3 ahead after missing a number of doubles. This
came to brutally bite him back with Ratajski taking out 84 for an 11-dart
break. He then sewed the tie up on double 16 for a hard-fought win.
ADVERTISEMENT

Kim Huybrechts ended the first round action triumphant against Daryl Gurney
The final first round contest was hyped up to be a thriller,
but in the end was a very tame end to the evening. Kim Huybrechts would not mind
as he thrashed a very poor Daryl Gurney 6-2.
Huybrechts flew out of the blocks or at least compared to a
sluggish Gurney. ‘The Hurricane’ broke to commence proceedings before doubling
his lead. Gurney looked likely to get on the board but made a hash of things. Going
for the bull when not needing to and missing big numbers saw him go a
double-break behind. Huybrechts almost made a mess of it himself on the outer
ring but was able to edge two away from glory. Gurney could not muster up a
response with a handful of doubles missed at double 16. That segment was also not found by the Belgian who allowed Gurney to get a leg on the board.
| Daryl Gurney | VS | Kim Huybrechts |
|---|---|---|
| 83.56 | Average (3 Darts) | 85.23 |
| 8 | 100+ Thrown | 12 |
| 5 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 2 |
| 70 | Highest Checkout | 76 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 13.33 | Checkout percentage | 24 |
| 1 / 13 | Checkout | 4 / 23 |
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






