"It’s a shark tank, Lennart is too nice at times" — Kim Huybrechts takes young Belgian talent under his wing
PDC
The European Q-School is, year after year, a brutal reality check for darts players with professional ambitions. Dreams are fulfilled, but just as often ruthlessly shattered. For 24-year-old Lennart Faes from Belgium, Q-School 2026 was an emotional rollercoaster: he stood one point away from a PDC Tour Card, but ultimately missed out by the slimmest margin. Yet there was no bitterness, only pride, realism, and confidence in what lies ahead. Together with mentor and figurehead Kim Huybrechts, Faes looked back in depth on the ‘Double Top’ podcast at a week that will help shape his career.
ADVERTISEMENT
From local player to Q-School revelation
Lennart Faes isn’t a darts player who was hailed from a young age as “the next big thing.” On the contrary: he only started taking darts seriously four to five years ago, around and just after the pandemic period. His rise, however, was swift. Through the Development Tour, the Challenge Tour, and strong performances at various tournaments, he worked his way to Q-School, where he immediately impressed and nearly secured a PDC Tour Card.
Faes originally began his darts journey at another darts shop, together with two good friends. When that shop went bankrupt, a new opportunity arose. Kim Huybrechts and his wife Dana offered him a contract to play under their shop. The bond between Huybrechts and Faes had already existed, mainly through encounters at tournaments and in league play. But a legendary quarterfinal in Berlaar—in which both players averaged around 140 per three darts and finished legs in 12 to 15 darts—proved the true starting point.
Read also
“That was a fantastic match,” Huybrechts recalls. “It ended 4-3 to me, but I immediately thought: this lad can really play. And he was still so young.”
From that moment, the collaboration intensified. Faes joined Huybrechts’ team, they trained together, and gradually a friendship and a coach–pupil relationship developed. “I truly believe in Lennart,” says Huybrechts. “Maybe even more than he believes in himself.”
A gentle soul in a hard world
ADVERTISEMENT
That last point goes straight to the heart of the story. According to Huybrechts, Faes is hugely talented but also a player with a self-doubting nature. “It’s a shark tank,” he states. “Full of machos, strutting, mind games. Lennart is the opposite of that. Too nice at times.”
Faes acknowledges that himself. He describes himself as someone who doesn’t make much noise, prefers to stay in the background, and avoids conflict. And that, according to Huybrechts, is dangerous at the highest level. “I’ve known too many lads who let people walk all over them. That’s not good. So I try to support him in that.”
That happens not only with tactical training, but mentally as well. During practice sessions, Huybrechts deliberately tries to trigger Faes, makes comments at crucial moments, and teaches him to handle pressure. “Chin up, shoulders back. Don’t show you’re a victim.”
Q-School: in the flow, until the bitter end
At Q-School itself, Faes felt strikingly good. He had to play three days in the first stage and stayed in his rhythm throughout. Rest days were no advantage for him—quite the opposite. “I often have trouble with my shoulder. By keeping on throwing it stayed loose. I was really in my element.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He carried that mental momentum into the final stage, where he ultimately finished tenth on the Q-School Order of Merit. He had the same number of points as the player in eighth, but an inferior leg difference. A margin of one point, one leg, one moment. “At that moment I didn’t fully realize how painful that was,” says Faes. “But afterwards you realize: every leg counts. Even when you already think a match is lost.”
A painful example was his 6-1 defeat to Toretta, in which Faes himself averaged around 90, but his opponent posted 104. “Those are matches where you have chances, but those legs make the difference.”
Final standings European Q-School Order of Merit
| Rk | Name | Points | Leg diff | Legs won |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jimmy van Schie | 12 | +32 | 89 |
| 2 | Chris Landman | 10 | +20 | 70 |
| 3 | Marvin Kraft | 10 | +11 | 71 |
| 4 | Benjamin Pratnemer | 9 | +25 | 67 |
| 5 | Adam Gawlas | 9 | +18 | 70 |
| 6 | Jurjen van der Velde | 9 | +14 | 69 |
| 7 | Alexander Merkx | 9 | +10 | 64 |
| 8 | Pascal Rupprecht | 8 | +22 | 63 |
| 9 | Andreas Harrysson | 8 | +16 | 58 |
| 10 | Lennert Faes | 8 | +13 | 64 |
Stress, mind games, and skewed dynamics
In the final stage, Faes also encountered the darker side of Q-School for the first time. Rumors circulated about players ‘helping’ each other, especially compatriots. Faes literally heard conversations where people said: “What do you need?” or “Let my mate win.”
ADVERTISEMENT
“At that moment I was mainly angry,” he admits. “Not even so much disappointed. I just knew: this isn’t going to happen anymore.”
Huybrechts is clear about it: “It shouldn’t happen. Period. But it is human. If you’ve been traveling together for years, sharing costs, that plays a role. The ranking system also encourages these situations.”
According to Huybrechts, this is a structural issue that is hard to solve. “Maybe something can be devised, but it’s incredibly complex.”
Why not getting a PDC Tour Card might be better
Strikingly, Huybrechts argues that, painful as it is, it might be better that Faes hasn’t taken a PDC Tour Card for now. “If I’m completely honest: for his development this might be the right moment.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He explains that Faes is currently averaging around 89 to 90. “To really compete on the Pro Tour, you need a consistent 95 to 97. He can already produce that one peak match, but not often enough yet.”
According to Huybrechts, getting a PDC Tour Card too early can even be harmful. “Taking a beating from the top 128 every week for two years… That does something to your confidence. Especially for someone who’s still mentally vulnerable.”
Faes shares that view. “I also felt, in a way, that I wasn’t quite ready yet. The goal wasn’t to get my PDC Tour Card right now. If it had happened, I’d obviously have taken it. But now it’s just about building further.”
Read also
Belgian versus Dutch: a mentality gap?
ADVERTISEMENT
The conversation also delves into the differences between Belgian and Dutch darters. According to Huybrechts, the Belgian mindset is often too modest. “We say: we’ll do our best, we’ll see. The Dutch are quicker to say: I’m going to win.”
He believes you see that difference not only in darts, but in almost every sport. “It’s not arrogance, it’s belief in yourself. And you project that to an opponent.”
On top of that, Belgian players are often judged more harshly by their own supporters. Negative reactions on social media are commonplace. “We constantly shoot down our own people,” says Huybrechts. “That causes damage, especially to young players.”
After Q-School, Faes fortunately received only positive messages, but he realizes that will change someday. “Negativity will always be there. We grew up with it.”
Rituals, calm, and looking ahead
ADVERTISEMENT
A striking detail: during Q-School, Faes developed a small superstition. Every day he drove past a church and made the sign of the cross. “Maybe superstitious, but it gave me calm.”
He also found that calm by choosing not to stay at the Q-School hotel, but in a secluded cottage. “That way I wasn’t constantly in the Q-School bubble. It helped enormously.”
For 2026, the focus is now fully on the Challenge Tour, supplemented with ADC and WDF tournaments. No specific ranking targets, just development. “When I play, I just want to go as far as possible.”
Proud, despite everything
At the end of the conversation, Faes perhaps sums it up best: “Above all, I’m very proud of what I’ve achieved.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Huybrechts fully agrees. “You’re going to hear a lot more from him. The talent is there. Now he just needs to grow some ‘cojones’.”
Or as they put it among themselves: “You’re too nice, Lennie. But that’ll change.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







