"It's not about proving people wrong, it's about proving ourselves right": England pairing Humphries and Littler finally live up to World Cup favourite tag
PDC
Expectations were sky-high, the pressure immense. But whereas last year there were still doubts about their partnership, this weekend Luke Littler and Luke Humphries proved why they are currently the two best darts players in the world. With an impressive victory in the final of the World Cup of Darts, they secured England a record-breaking sixth world title in the nations’ tournament.
ADVERTISEMENT
Afterwards, pride was the overriding emotion for both players. Not just because of the title, but above all because of the way it was achieved. Under immense pressure, following a nerve-wracking semi-final against Wales and a dominant final, Littler and Humphries showed that, as a team, they form an almost unbeatable combination at the World Cup.
"It feels amazing. Like Luke has said and I've said plenty of times, we've played together, we've won as a team, and we dug deep," said Littler after the final to DartsNews.com among others.
"Afternoon sessions are always the hardest, whether we're playing together or against each other. Wales played their part, but as soon as we got into the evening session, that's when we both played our best. That second session was unbelievable from both of us."
Humphries felt more was in the tank
Averaging around 111 in that session, Humphries said that it wasn't shock that they averaged what they did, it was more thinking they could've done more and that he was proud of the fact that they proved the doubters wrong who said they couldn't do it as a team.
"To be honest, I don't think we played in a way that we're not capable of. We just played the standard we know we can play at. It was about getting through that first game yesterday because there was so much pressure on us. Last year we lost our first game and people were saying we couldn't play together, couldn't win together and weren't a team.
ADVERTISEMENT
"It was hard because we are a team – we just had one bad game. We managed to get through a tough match yesterday and another tough game against Wales. Me and Luke keep saying we hate afternoon sessions. We get up late! We knew if we got through Wales, we'd come alive in the evening. We both do. I'm really proud of how we played against Scotland and Wales. Michael van Gerwen was in great form, hitting huge scores and putting us under pressure, but we didn't relent. We kept going, hit some big finishes and Luke produced some massive scores. When we put it all together, we're a difficult team to beat."
But while there is this touch of proving people wrong, Humphries said it wasn't at the forefront and that it was more proving to themselves what they knew about what they could achieve. "Not really. We're here for ourselves, we're here as a team, we're here to make our families proud and represent England. It's not about proving people wrong. It's about proving ourselves right. We know how good we are and how good we can be as a team.
"A lot of people doubted us, but we wanted to prove to ourselves that we could do what we believed we could do. Tonight we showed that with some great scoring and finishing. This was a special win. We really wanted this one."
Is it coming home twice?
Given the football World Cup is now on, Humphries was asked if they could do the double and he joked that he didn't think they would be the inspiration for it to happen. "I don't think they'll be watching us thinking we're the inspiration, to be fair! But if it gives them five per cent, happy days.
ADVERTISEMENT
"They've got a great chance. England aren't favourites for the football World Cup, whereas we were favourites here and we did our job. It would be great to see England do the double. We've done our part and we'd love to see them do theirs. It'll be tough because there are so many great nations involved, but we'll be backing them all the way."
As someone who often doesn't appear in Germany due to crowd reaction towards him, Littler though is very much dedicated to returning and for the long haul too. "One hundred per cent. There's no point winning it and not coming back. I think that first game against Spain really nailed it for us. We know we can score, finish and win together. We'll be back next year and hopefully for the next ten years."
Humphries too but he is of his own admission that a year is a long time in darts and he never knows what the future holds. "We've said on stage that Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis are two of the greatest English players ever.
"We'd be blessed and fortunate to follow in their footsteps and maybe match their four World Cup titles. There's no guarantee in darts that I'll be back every year because things can happen, but I hope I am for the next five to ten years. Hopefully we can win more than just one – hopefully we can win loads."

England finally achieve darting destiny.
ADVERTISEMENT
As both players who win many titles on their own, Littler honed in on what it means compared to other major titles. "The main thing is working together. Before the game against Spain, we talked about what doubles we fancied and how we wanted to set shots up.
"There were times when Luke didn't go for big checkouts like 167 or 164 because we'd left ourselves time and he trusted me to finish. That's why we're so good together. We don't always need to go for the big finish if we fancy our team-mate to hit the double. We put in some big performances throughout the tournament and I'm very happy."
While for Humphries, it is continued great form and while under his own admission that he could've won more, he admitted that it is the confidence booster he for sure needed.
"My brother texted me earlier and reminded me this was my eighth final in a row. With the Premier League nights, the Premier League final, Copenhagen, the World Cup and ProTour events, maybe I could have won more than I did.
"But it was important for me to come here and win on the big stage. I was disappointed with myself last week for not beating Michael van Gerwen, but I told myself it was up to me to push Luke, work hard and help us win this title.
ADVERTISEMENT
"It's great for me personally, but this is a team event. It's not about me, it's about us. We're going to have some great battles over the next six months at the Matchplay, Grand Prix, European Championship and World Championship. We get on really well off stage, but we both want to win everything.
"Luke's winning a lot of it at the moment and I'm just trying to nick one here and there! We're pushing the standard of the game as high as we can and it's up to everyone else to try and catch us."
But asked if it's now a bad thing that he has been given the winning feeling again for their own personal ambitions, Littler said that it is a team effort and he doesn't think like that.
"It's good if he gets that winning feeling back, but from my side maybe not so good! But neither of us won this on our own. We won it as a team. We're going to be battling each other all year and for years to come. It's good for the sport. We've got two players who want to win everything, we push each other, and whoever wins, wins."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026




