Mervyn King was close Sunday to a second Challenge Tour title this weekend, but it was Jack Tweddell who ran away with the title at the fifteenth event of the season.
ADVERTISEMENT
For the 30-year-old Englishman, it is his first triumph on the Challenge Tour. He defeated Jim Moston (5-3), Ryan Palmer (5-1), Andreas Harrysson (5-1), Ryan O'Connor (5-3), Alexander Merkx (5-4), Dmitriy Zhukov (5-2) and Colin Osborne (5-1) for a spot in the final.
King made it to the final by defeating Steven Harbert (5-0), Luis Camacho (5-1), David Pallett (5-3), Eddie Lovely (5-4), Sam Spivey (5-3), Shane McGuirk (5-2) and Nathan Girvan (5-0). Then in the final, Tweddell was too strong 5-1 for King, who did win Challenge Tour 11 earlier this weekend.
The Challenge Tour circuit is open to players who participated in the Q-School but did not win a Tour Card. Through the Challenge Tour, the highest ranked players can gain entry to the Players Championship tournaments as alternates. The top two players at the end of the season receive a PDC Tour Card and may compete in the World Darts Championship.
Read also
Results PDC Challenge Tour 15
Finale
Jack Tweddell (92.94) 5 | 1 (91.21) Mervyn King
Semi-final
Jack Tweddell (93.66) 5 | 1 (83.38) Colin Osborne
Mervyn King (90.54) 5 | 0 (83.54) Nathan Girvan
Quarterfinals
Colin Osborne (87.46) 5 | 2 (75.69) Steve West
Jack Tweddell (89.30) 5 | 2 (88.24) Dmitriy Zhukov
Mervyn King (92.09) 5 | 2 (87.58) Shane McGuirk
Nathan Girvan (87.60) 5 | 4 (85.62) Michael Flynn
Last 16
Colin Osborne (81.51) 5 | 4 (76.50) Martin Thomas
Steve West (86.15) 5 | 4 (89.01) John O'Shea
Dmitriy Zhukov (88.32) 5 | 1 (75.97) Keegan Brown
Jack Tweddell (88.08) 5 | 4 (84.58) Alexander Merkx
ADVERTISEMENT
Shane McGuirk (89.98) 5 | 3 (88.63) Stuart Wares
Mervyn King (81.82) 5 | 3 (82.84) Sam Spivey
Nathan Girvan (88.65) 5 | 4 (93.05) Jamie Atkins
Michael Flynn (88.06) 5 | 3 (78.56) Phil Coward
Last 32
Colin Osborne (85.42) 5 | 4 (87.02) Trevor Burkhill
Martin Thomas (96.02) 5 | 3 (79.86) Bruno Stoeckli
John O'Shea (89.47) 5 | 4 (91.57) Danny van Trijp
Steve West (85.40) 5 | 3 (76.76) Charlie Manby
Keegan Brown (83.42) 5 | 3 (80.75) Andy Hamilton
Dmitriy Zhukov (89.92) 5 | 2 (79.24) Jenson Walker
Jack Tweddell (95.29) 5 | 3 (89.25) Ryan O'Connor
Alexander Merkx (91.94) 5 | 1 (93.03) Marcel Walpen
Shane McGuirk (82.58) 5 | 0 (71.34) Colin Gibson
Stuart Wares (79.27) 5 | 1 (72.08) Matt Gallett
Sam Spivey (80.65) 5 | 4 (79.36) Callum Francis
Mervyn King (82.14) 5 | 4 (80.36) Eddie Lovely
Jamie Atkins (82.77) 5 | 2 (75.13) Ron Meulenkamp
Nathan Girvan (87.66) 5 | 4 (88.31) Samuel Price
Phil Coward (83.82) 5 | 4 (87.87) Martin Grearson
Michael Flynn (83.50) 5 | 0 (77.00) Oliver Mitchell
ADVERTISEMENT
Last 64
Colin Osborne (82.58) 5 | 0 (71.93) Christian Perez
Trevor Burkhill (77.55) 5 | 4 (80.10) Steve Hine
Bruno Stoeckli (82.62) 5 | 1 (82.47) Lewis Pride
Martin Thomas (88.41) 5 | 0 (72.18) Bhav Patel
Danny van Trijp (92.78) 5 | 0 (82.92) David Sharp
John O'Shea (85.40) 5 | 0 (71.28) Rowby-John Rodriguez
Charlie Manby (90.29) 5 | 2 (84.38) Aden Kirk
Steve West (94.12) 5 | 2 (79.06) Lee Budgen
Andy Hamilton (78.19) 5 | 4 (83.57) Ciaran Teehan
Keegan Brown (93.28) 5 | 3 (81.43) Andrew Callary
Jenson Walker (89.43) 5 | 3 (80.21) Charlie Kemp
Dmitriy Zhukov (72.32) 5 | 2 (73.71) Lee Williams
Jack Tweddell (86.34) 5 | 1 (89.53) Andreas Harrysson
Ryan O'Connor (83.05) 5 | 4 (87.56) Scott Campbell
Alexander Merkx (86.38) 5 | 0 (75.15) John Henderson
ADVERTISEMENT
Marcel Walpen (83.92) 5 | 3 (77.35) Derek Maclean
Colin Gibson (78.89) 5 | 4 (83.64) Lee Evans
Shane McGuirk (96.81) 5 | 2 (82.07) Jonas Graversen
Stuart Wares (81.70) 5 | 3 (78.66) Daniel Nicholls
Matt Gallett (79.01) 5 | 3 (77.45) Arno Merk
Sam Spivey (90.27) 5 | 4 (91.39) Ryan Branley
Callum Francis (88.41) 5 | 0 (81.11) Jacques Labre
Eddie Lovely (93.26) 5 | 2 (92.28) Beau Greaves
Mervyn King (91.29) 5 | 3 (95.41) David Pallett
Ron Meulenkamp (97.92) 5 | 2 (89.76) Kevin Leadenham
Jamie Atkins (90.54) 5 | 0 (71.19) Lee Barrow
Samuel Price (86.93) 5 | 3 (86.75) Jarno Bottenberg
ADVERTISEMENT
Nathan Girvan (88.41) 5 | 0 (77.00) Tommy Morris
Phil Coward (83.98) 5 | 4 (85.29) James Howard Hughes
Martin Grearson (83.83) 5 | 1 (80.43) Andrew Cass
Michael Flynn (85.79) 5 | 1 (77.71) Patrick Quinn
Oliver Mitchell (88.41) 5 | 2 (79.99) Scott Baker
Last 128
Colin Osborne (79.17) 5 | 4 (73.80) Jimmy McKirdy
Christian Perez (84.53) 5 | 3 (75.54) Brian Raman
Trevor Burkhill (91.65) 5 | 0 (81.37) Martin Tonks
Steve Hine (79.18) 5 | 2 (81.71) Keenan Thomas
Bruno Stoeckli (91.62) 5 | 3 (86.58) John Part
Lewis Pride (84.09) 5 | 3 (88.95) Daniel Ayres
Bhav Patel (76.27) 5 | 2 (70.43) Charlie Symons
Martin Thomas (87.57) 5 | 3 (86.34) Carl Sneyd
David Sharp (90.43) 5 | 3 (77.69) David Davies
Danny van Trijp (83.98) 5 | 3 (82.56) Jurjen van der Velde
Rowby-John Rodriguez (72.02) 5 | 2 (76.27) Kevin Troppmann
John O'Shea (92.36) 5 | 4 (84.98) Danny Goddard
Aden Kirk (93.94) 5 | 0 (82.04) Kelvin O'Keefe
Charlie Manby (85.40) 5 | 0 (75.50) Jeffrey De Zwaan
ADVERTISEMENT
Lee Budgen (83.49) 5 | 3 (74.04) Dylan Dowling
Steve West (87.62) 5 | 2 (85.56) Charlie Martin
Ciaran Teehan (74.25) 5 | 4 (76.91) Stefan Bellmont
Andy Hamilton (85.81) 5 | 2 (89.81) Graham Hall
Andrew Callary (82.46) 5 | 3 (78.00) Taylor Greaves
Keegan Brown (91.75) 5 | 4 (87.92) Scott Waites
Charlie Kemp (76.40) 5 | 2 (67.83) Marco Jungwirth
Jenson Walker (86.33) 5 | 3 (79.11) Jason Heaver
Dmitriy Zhukov (85.08) 5 | 2 (75.70) Tim Scholz
Lee Williams (85.80) 5 | 4 (82.40) James Parkin
Andreas Harrysson (91.62) 5 | 3 (76.76) Louis Lucas-Carter
Jack Tweddell (82.23) 5 | 1 (76.59) Ryan Palmer
Scott Campbell (86.05) 5 | 3 (77.56) Ultan McDyer
Ryan O'Connor (86.22) 5 | 2 (76.24) Tom Lonsdale
John Henderson (77.53) 5 | 1 (65.83) Paul Mitchell
ADVERTISEMENT
Alexander Merkx (90.67) 5 | 3 (89.72) Ashley Coleman
Derek Maclean (84.48) 5 | 2 (82.28) David Sumner
Marcel Walpen (86.98) 5 | 4 (84.12) Damian Mol
Lee Evans (81.68) 5 | 0 (67.10) John Davey
Colin Gibson (83.78) 5 | 4 (75.98) Steven Inkpen
Jonas Graversen (74.77) 5 | 4 (74.42) Janek Hill
Shane McGuirk (94.92) 5 | 4 (86.23) Mike Warburton
Stuart Wares (92.78) 5 | 0 (84.26) Michael Huntley
Daniel Nicholls (83.50) 5 | 0 (73.03) Reece Colley
Arno Merk (89.77) 5 | 2 (78.93) Chris Hurds
Matt Gallett (80.81) 5 | 2 (81.36) Carl Wilson
Ryan Branley (87.11) 5 | 4 (83.91) Dean Finn Forde
ADVERTISEMENT
Sam Spivey (86.32) 5 | 1 (76.38) Frankie Ansell
Jacques Labre (89.88) 5 | 1 (74.76) Tom Parradine
Callum Francis (91.94) 5 | 1 (81.57) Peter Burgoyne
Beau Greaves (88.34) 5 | 1 (81.03) David Evans
Eddie Lovely (86.95) 5 | 3 (82.56) Jason Wilson
David Pallett (95.13) 5 | 0 (76.19) David Williams
Mervyn King (79.54) 5 | 1 (69.87) Luis Camacho
Kevin Leadenham (86.73) 5 | 4 (82.69) Joe Croft
Ron Meulenkamp (80.72) 5 | 4 (77.01) Kevin Lane
Lee Barrow (76.94) 5 | 2 (80.09) Joe Hunt
Jamie Atkins (83.94) 5 | 1 (69.42) Lee Grace
Jarno Bottenberg (74.26) 5 | 2 (70.49) Neil Parry
Samuel Price (94.01) 5 | 2 (92.26) Jamie Hughes
Nathan Girvan (82.37) 5 | 2 (74.93) James Waite
Tommy Morris (73.61) 5 | 2 (71.98) Kevin McDine
James Howard Hughes (79.35) 5 | 3 (75.98) Sietse Lap
Phil Coward (75.91) 5 | 0 (68.00) Vinay Ramnath
Andrew Cass (91.65) 5 | 0 (61.67) Marco Reichenpfader
Martin Grearson (78.44) 5 | 2 (74.81) Jaikob Selby-Rivas
Patrick Quinn (91.54) 5 | 3 (87.58) Shane Turner
Michael Flynn (104.33) 5 | 2 (97.31) Darius Labanauskas
Oliver Mitchell (88.11) 5 | 2 (80.25) Callum Goffin
Scott Baker (87.74) 5 | 2 (81.11) Niels Aagaard Nielsen
Last 256
Brian Raman (79.95) 5 | 0 (70.47) Danny Trueman
Christian Perez (88.24) 5 | 3 (80.27) Jimmy Bristow
Keenan Thomas (74.41) 5 | 0 (65.76) David Hill
Steve Hine (97.18) 5 | 3 (101.89) Shaun Carroll
Lewis Pride (76.44) 5 | 2 (69.34) Kristian Barker
Daniel Ayres (92.78) 5 | 0 (51.00) Laszlo B Csato
Bhav Patel (74.14) 5 | 4 (68.65) Ricky Palmer
Carl Sneyd (75.22) 5 | 2 (69.61) Ian Lever
Martin Thomas (84.13) 5 | 4 (84.54) Adam Mould
Danny van Trijp (80.81) 5 | 0 (47.14) Chi-Minh Tran
Jurjen van der Velde (108.32) 5 | 2 (87.84) Nathan Care
John O'Shea (82.69) 5 | 4 (82.98) Jimmy van Schie
Danny Goddard (85.31) 5 | 1 (67.06) Karl Williams
Jeffrey De Zwaan (74.27) 5 | 4 (70.06) Robert Nelson
Charlie Manby (86.65) 5 | 1 (75.12) Dan Hands
Dylan Dowling (75.75) 5 | 4 (76.58) Marc Vleghert
Steve West (75.82) 5 | 1 (66.52) Max Baulcomb
Charlie Martin (78.28) 5 | 0 (67.97) Deian Roberts
Graham Hall (81.68) 5 | 0 (68.90) Graham Usher
Andy Hamilton (82.39) 5 | 3 (80.84) Ellis Radford
Keegan Brown (90.86) 5 | 1 (78.66) James Evans-Bradford
Scott Waites (82.19) 5 | 3 (82.01) Patrick Dekker
Jason Heaver (71.12) 5 | 4 (70.76) Nathan Potter
Jenson Walker (95.85) 5 | 3 (79.94) Geert Nentjes
Dmitriy Zhukov (73.82) 5 | 1 (66.42) Ben Robb
James Parkin (75.99) 5 | 3 (80.38) Ted Evetts
Lee Williams (74.41) 5 | 0 (68.64) Myles Avory
Jack Tweddell (84.04) 5 | 3 (81.70) Jim Moston
Ryan Palmer (83.96) 5 | 4 (83.26) Adam Beck
Tom Lonsdale (72.96) 5 | 0 (67.56) Stephen Castle
Ryan O'Connor (86.61) 5 | 1 (69.00) Adrian Gray
John Henderson (80.30) 5 | 1 (76.68) Lee Cocks
Alexander Merkx (76.75) 5 | 3 (72.29) Tom Riding
Ashley Coleman (84.89) 5 | 3 (87.30) James Vanbesien
David Sumner (80.81) 5 | 0 (69.58) Danny Jansen
Marcel Walpen (87.90) 5 | 2 (85.01) Ash Ling
Damian Mol (93.94) 5 | 0 (72.00) Mat Caste
Steven Inkpen (70.21) 5 | 3 (63.40) Dimitri Nees
Colin Gibson (75.87) 5 | 4 (81.97) Tom Sykes
Shane McGuirk (88.66) 5 | 3 (88.79) Jarred Cole
Mike Warburton (81.53) 5 | 2 (78.66) Remo Mandiau
Daniel Nicholls (89.46) 5 | 0 (57.62) Serge Brisset
Reece Colley (88.65) 5 | 2 (73.63) Davy Robijns
Arno Merk (85.60) 5 | 2 (81.94) Tom Baughan
Matt Gallett (86.52) 5 | 1 (81.59) Kirk De Ruyter
Carl Wilson (89.46) 5 | 0 (80.00) Lionel Maranhao
Sam Spivey (86.24) 5 | 2 (79.71) Simon Stothart
Frankie Ansell (87.04) 5 | 4 (81.97) Jamai van den Herik
Peter Burgoyne (80.54) 5 | 3 (81.93) Conor Heneghan
Callum Francis (96.68) 5 | 1 (90.28) Nicolas Thuillier
Beau Greaves (88.41) 5 | 0 (75.74) Adam Smith-neale
Eddie Lovely (83.09) 5 | 3 (76.77) Owen Maiden
Jason Wilson (82.55) 5 | 4 (86.17) Henry Coates
David Williams (65.09) 5 | 1 (66.12) Richie Burnett
Mervyn King (93.94) 5 | 0 (51.58) Steven Harbert
Luis Camacho (69.72) 5 | 3 (71.90) Coni Singh Nagi
Ron Meulenkamp (88.63) 5 | 4 (84.08) Scott Taylor
Kevin Lane (81.19) 5 | 4 (87.59) Jeffrey Sparidaans
Jamie Atkins (83.57) 5 | 3 (77.50) Gary Blades
Lee Grace (64.77) 5 | 3 (59.90) Bruno Rangel
Jamie Hughes (78.21) 5 | 1 (73.27) Aaron Beeney
Samuel Price (81.88) 5 | 2 (66.94) Gino Vermeersch
Nathan Girvan (91.24) 5 | 1 (78.26) Sean Fisher
Tommy Morris (84.44) 5 | 0 (61.72) Danny Moore
Kevin McDine (70.24) 5 | 2 (65.90) Mark Boardman
Vinay Ramnath (73.54) 5 | 1 (61.47) Sean Taylor
Phil Coward (75.67) 5 | 2 (70.16) Steve Sewell
Jaikob Selby-Rivas (78.65) 5 | 3 (75.50) Calvin Nicolai
Martin Grearson (85.32) 5 | 2 (81.21) Thomas Banks
Patrick Quinn (79.11) 5 | 0 (67.32) Neilie Brouder
Darius Labanauskas (84.43) 5 | 4 (87.57) Kevin Burness
Michael Flynn (85.57) 5 | 3 (71.17) Ben Adams
Oliver Mitchell (81.83) 5 | 3 (80.07) Stu Wilson
Scott Baker (71.11) 5 | 2 (70.35) Paul Higgins
Niels Aagaard Nielsen (79.14) 5 | 2 (72.78) Bailey White

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







