
Peter Wright, Jonny Clayton and Martin Schindler all booked their places in the last 16 of the Czech Darts Open 2025 on Saturday in Prague albeit it was very much contrasting as Wright struggled while Clayton and Schindler shone.
ADVERTISEMENT
Wright who has struggled as of late and continues to fall down the rankings is through at the Czech Darts Open despite another below-par display. He did just enough to get past Benjamin Pratnemer 6-2. The two-time world champion opened with a sluggish 21-darter and was pegged back immediately, but managed to edge ahead again with a 14-dart leg – his best of the match. From there, both men struggled for consistency, yet “Snakebite” was able to punish Pratnemer’s errors with a run of legs in 19, 20 and 18 darts before sealing victory with a 15-darter. This was underlined with Wright averaging just 83 in victory.
Clayton impressed in a far more assured display, sweeping aside Ryan Joyce 6-2. “The Ferret” never looked troubled, reeling off five of his six winning legs in 14 darts. Joyce managed to nick two legs, but the Welshman’s relentless scoring and clinical finishing meant he coasted into the final day. It was a 97 average with 50% on the outer ring for the Welshman who continues his rich vein of form.
Schindler joined them with a 6-3 triumph over Madars Razma. The German had to work hard early on after Razma opened up a 2-0 lead, but “The Wall” responded with checkouts of 110 and 112 to level the contest. Schindler then shifted through the gears, breaking with a 13-darter and wrapping up the match in style with a 108 finish to secure his third-round spot. Schindler produced three ton plus checkouts and averaged 93 in what was a very accomplished display.
Follow the Czech Darts Open 2025 via our livescores.
Follow the Czech Darts Open 2025 via our livescores.
Read also
Smith and Searle triumph as Dutch trio surge
Ross Smith also progressed after overcoming Andrew Gilding 6-4. The opening five legs all went with throw before “Smudger” struck the first break in the sixth to move 4-2 up. Gilding squandered five darts to level, and Smith punished by moving 5-3 ahead before closing out the contest with a steady 16-darter.
Ryan Searle joined him in the last 16 thanks to a 6-4 victory over Dave Chisnall. “Chizzy” made the brighter start by taking the opening two legs, but “Heavy Metal” stormed back with a superb burst of 14, 13, 13 and 12 darts. Chisnall capitalised on some missed doubles to pull it back to 4-4, but Searle steadied himself to claim the last two legs and seal the win.
ADVERTISEMENT
| Dave Chisnall | VS | Ryan Searle |
|---|---|---|
| 93.5 | Average (3 Darts) | 103.27 |
| 8 | 100+ Thrown | 9 |
| 6 | 140+ Thrown | 12 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 44 | Highest Checkout | 81 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 36.4 | Checkout percentage | 33.3 |
| 4 / 11 | Checkout | 6 / 18 |
It was also a strong session for the Dutch contingent, with Gian van Veen, Wessel Nijman and Jermaine Wattimena all coming through.
Van Veen got the better of his World Cup teammate Danny Noppert in an all-Dutch clash, running out a 6-2 winner. “The Giant” punished early missed doubles from “The Freeze” and threatened a nine-darter with seven perfect darts in the fifth leg before cruising over the line with a 12-darter on 87.
Nijman came through a thriller against Damon Heta, edging the Australian 6-5 in a last-leg decider. After racing into a 4-1 lead with a flurry of 13- and 14-darters, the man from Uitgeest was pegged back as Heta landed a brilliant 158 checkout to level at 4-4. The contest went the distance, but Nijman held his nerve, starting the decider and sealing victory in 14 darts.
Wattimena completed the Dutch treble with a commanding 6-2 victory over Chris Dobey. “The Machine Gun” pounced on six missed darts in the opening leg and never looked back, landing finishes of 120, 71 and 101 along the way. A final 64 checkout confirmed an impressive display against the former Masters champion.
ADVERTISEMENT
| Chris Dobey | VS | Jermaine Wattimena |
|---|---|---|
| 92.97 | Average (3 Darts) | 95.06 |
| 6 | 100+ Thrown | 15 |
| 9 | 140+ Thrown | 8 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 0 |
| 81 | Highest Checkout | 120 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 2 |
| 15.4 | Checkout percentage | 75 |
| 2 / 13 | Checkout | 6 / 8 |

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026







