“Let’s just pool that prize money” – Baggage issues unexpectedly meant extra prize money for Vincent van der Voort at an exhibition featuring the sport’s world elite
PDC
Gian van Veen travelled to New Zealand well ahead of his World Series Down Under debut, but his preparation took an unexpected turn en route. The Dutchman’s suitcase failed to arrive in Auckland and turned out to have been left behind in Paris after the first leg of the journey. According to Vincent van der Voort, Van Veen is far from the first darter to face this. The former professional once experienced a similar situation himself during a trip with, among others, Michael van Gerwen and Raymond van Barneveld.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Veen is taking his followers along via a vlog during his adventure on the other side of the world. He shows not only the darts, but also how players travel and stay during a World Series trip like this. Van der Voort sees the appeal, even though he is not a big fan of vlogs himself.
“He’s vlogging his whole trip. That’s fun of course, also for people who are interested. He also shows a few private things, which hotel room he has and how he travels. The PDC always pays for this, of course. Then it’s also funny to see what Business Class looks like.”
Van der Voort is not exactly a regular viewer of such videos himself. “I’m not into vlogs,” he admits on the Darts Draait Door podcast.
Read also
Van Veen turns to social media after missing suitcase
The situation became much more troublesome when it emerged that Van Veen’s baggage had not reached its final destination. His suitcase went missing early in the long journey.
“It was still in Paris. It was lost after the first flight already. He’s in Auckland now, of course. You have to hope it heads over there fairly quickly, otherwise that’s really annoying.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Veen decided to publicise his problem via social media. That quickly drew a response from the airline. According to Van der Voort, that is a smart way to put some pressure on the case.
“Of course that’s smart. An organisation like that is allergic to this, obviously. I’ve been through it in the past as well. If you tag the airline in the entire post, you get an answer in no time. They’ll want to solve it as quickly as possible.”
According to the former darter, that also includes letting people know afterwards that the matter was handled properly. “If you then also mention that everything was resolved perfectly, they’re happy again too. Why wouldn’t you use that?”
Van der Voort went through the same with the world’s elite
Van der Voort can speak from experience about lost baggage. It once went wrong during a trip to an exhibition tournament on a small island near England. Van der Voort travelled at the time with Van Gerwen and Van Barneveld via Heathrow to the final destination.
ADVERTISEMENT
“We had to go from Schiphol to Heathrow and from Heathrow take a very small flight to that little island to play the demo there. After the first flight the baggage was already lost. And everything was in there.”
Van der Voort found himself in illustrious company. Big names like Phil Taylor, Adrian Lewis, Gary Anderson and James Wade were also present.
“Taylor, Lewis, Anderson, Wade, all the top players in the world were there. And me,” Van der Voort jokes.
Because virtually the entire group faced the same problem, things moved quickly behind the scenes. “Then suddenly a lot gets arranged so that we still had our stuff on time.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Lost suitcases actually earned Van der Voort money
For Van der Voort the problem even brought an unexpected financial upside. The exhibition had prize money attached, with players going deepest earning extra.
Because everyone was without their own baggage, the players decided it would not be fair to pay out the prize money according to the usual distribution.
“Because none of us had a suitcase, we said: this isn’t fair either. Let’s just put the prize money into one pot.”
For Van der Voort it was not a tough decision. With so many world-class players in the field, he knew an equal split would likely work in his favour.
ADVERTISEMENT
“If you’re going up against the top seven... I was the easiest to convince. So I profited nicely from that,” he says with a laugh.
When the suitcases finally did arrive, Van der Voort naturally had no intention of going back on the agreement. “Then the suitcase turned up and I said: we can’t go back now. We’ve made an agreement, we’re sticking to it. That’s what happened in the end. I took something nice home from that as well.”

Thanks to a lucrative deal, Vincent van der Voort took extra prize money home
Spare darts can prevent a lot of grief
A lost suitcase is a bigger issue for a professional darter than missing clothing alone. Darts are not usually allowed in hand luggage on a flight and therefore typically go in the hold. If a suitcase disappears, a player can be left without his most important equipment.
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Van der Voort, there are several ways to mitigate that risk. He cites Niels Zonneveld and Wessel Nijman as examples.
“I know that Niels and Wessel both put a set together in each other’s suitcase. If one goes missing, you still have one. That’s smart, of course.”
Van der Voort chose a different solution during his career. He ensured spare kit was always available in England.
“What I did was leave a pair of smart trousers, a shirt and my darts with my management in England. You can also leave it with the officials, of course, so it’s always at the Pro Tour. You can hand it in at the PDPA. So there really are options.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
By train to the Worlds
For the most important tournament of the year, Van der Voort no longer wanted to take any risks. In his final years at the Worlds, he therefore regularly chose the train to London.
“That’s why in the last few years I went to the Worlds mostly by train. Then you could just keep it with you. The suitcase can’t go missing then. Anything can happen, of course, but the chance is very small.”
The train also proved a practical option. “You arrive in the heart of London and it was just a ten-minute trip to the hotel. And I can tell you it’s fairly busy in London around Christmas. So by far the easiest solution.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








