Krzysztof Ratajski prevails against Felix Springer in German Darts Championship as Andrew Gilding's return to Dortmund dealt significant blow
PDC
It was a dramatic first session in the German Darts Championship in Hildesheim, with Krzysztof Ratajski and Andrew Gilding picking up mixed results in their hunt to qualify for the European Championships.
ADVERTISEMENT
Ratajski secured a hugely important 6-1 win against the
closely observed Felix Springer, younger brother of Niko Springer who has
already left his mark in the PDC, winning a European Tour event in Budapest
recently. He was in attendance to watch his brother, but Felix could not come up
with the goods to defeat the Polish Eagle who made it tough for the German.
He started with a 12-darter to take the lead, swiftly
followed by a break of throw. Springer mounted some pressure on his opponent by
leaving double 11 after straying into the double 18 segment, but Ratajski
safely secured the leg. The crowd went crazy after Springer got his first leg
on the board, in which he reacted with a big roar. He was unable to take
anything else from the tie, with the Pole showing his class on the way to
victory.
This win for Ratajski bumped Gilding down to 32nd
and the last qualification spot, with a win against O’Connor mandatory. He
started well as he clinched the first leg but a 116 from the Irishman gets him
on the board. He followed that up with a break before taking out 68 in two to
streak 3-1 ahead. He should have had a dart to continue his positive form, but he
failed to hit the big number, allowing Gilding to hold. The Magpie went two
ahead once more and stretched it out to three legs after the former UK Open
champion once again missed at tops. Goldfinger collected a couple of legs to
keep his dreams alit, but that was extinguished by O’Connor who pinned double
eight to win 6-4, leaving Gilding in an uncertain position for Dortmund.
| Andrew Gilding | VS | William O'Connor |
|---|---|---|
| 92.54 | Average (3 Darts) | 95.21 |
| 15 | 100+ Thrown | 14 |
| 9 | 140+ Thrown | 8 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 3 |
| 62 | Highest Checkout | 116 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 40 | Checkout percentage | 40 |
| 4 / 10 | Checkout | 6 / 15 |
Menzies and Nijman power through
The opening match saw a high-quality affair between Cameron
Menzies and Wesley Plaisier. The Dutchman found 13 and 12 darters to motor into
a 2-0 lead before Menzies found three on the spin to go ahead for the first
time. Plaisier levelled the tie before taking out 143 in fabulous fashion. Despite
this, it was the last leg he would win as Cammy made a dash towards the finish
line. Plaisier’s levels fell slightly, and sloppiness on the outer ring at the
end opens the door for the Scot to slot his name into round two.
Wessel Nijman missed 14 darts at a double on his way to a
6-2 win over home-nation qualifier Martin Kramer, with eight of them coming in
the first leg in which he fell behind. Nijman follows that with a 101 checkout,
but a couple of legs later Kramer gets his second leg on the board. Bonsai
missed three darts at double to go 3-2 ahead, with Nijman going on to take the next
four legs and breeze into round two.
ADVERTISEMENT
| Cameron Menzies | VS | Wesley Plaisier |
|---|---|---|
| 95.68 | Average (3 Darts) | 92.38 |
| 11 | 100+ Thrown | 7 |
| 7 | 140+ Thrown | 9 |
| 3 | 180 Thrown | 2 |
| 100 | Highest Checkout | 143 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 60 | Checkout percentage | 30.8 |
| 6 / 10 | Checkout | 4 / 13 |
Joyce produces performance of the afternoon
Ryan Joyce was superb in a 6-2 triumph over Justin Hood,
averaging over 104 in the process. He commenced with a 14-darter before ending
up in the madhouse after a plethora of missed doubles. His favourite double 16
is found twice on the bounce to go 4-0 ahead before Hood finds that target to
prevent the whitewash. Relentless took out 83 on double nine to go one away, but
Happy Feet found a 12 darter to keep the tie alive. Joyce soon extinguished any
hopes of a comeback by taking out 87 in two to set up a second-round clash
against the number one seed Stephen Bunting.
Read also
The closest tie of the session came between Luke Woodhouse
and Tom Bissell, with Woody just managing to sneak through. Woodhouse previously
made the Swiss Darts Trophy final and will be looking for one better in
Hildesheim. He stole the first break after Bissell fluffed his lines, but The
Business upped his game and won two legs on the bounce to level at 3-3. Two
legs later, Woodhouse takes out 110 after previously coming close in a prior leg
to go 5-4 ahead and stole a march on his opponent with double eight getting the
job done.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was a comfortable win for Niels Zonneveld, who defeated Darius
Labanauskas 6-2. The Lithuanian mounted a comeback when 3-0 down, winning two
legs on the spin to keep Tripple Z on his toes. It would not be enough however
as the Dutchman swept up the remaining three legs to progress.
Steve Lennon was able to dispatch Jeffrey de Graaf with
ease, coming through a slow start to take out combination shots including 61,
87, and 114 enroute to going 5-1 ahead. De Graaf pinned an 11 darter to keep
his faint hopes alive, but Scuba Steve confirmed the win on tops for a 6-2 triumph,
averaging over 97 in the process.
| Ryan Joyce | VS | Justin Hood |
|---|---|---|
| 104.24 | Average (3 Darts) | 98.58 |
| 10 | 100+ Thrown | 5 |
| 7 | 140+ Thrown | 4 |
| 2 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 87 | Highest Checkout | 84 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 46.2 | Checkout percentage | 50 |
| 6 / 13 | Checkout | 2 / 4 |

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026







