Grand Slam of Darts Round-Up | Humphries and Smith pip Aspinall to knockout stage while Price and Schindler prevail to progress
PDC
Luke Humphries and Michael Smith came out victorious as they made it out of Group A,
with Nathan Aspinall the loser in a very competitive group in the Grand Slam of
Darts.
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries needed just one leg to seal his spot in the top
two, and he did it in the first leg with a superb 10 darter – continuing from
his nine-darter against Smith. He followed that with a 129 checkout on double
12 for a 12-darter. This meant that Aspinall needed to win five consecutive
legs to make it out of the group. He clinched one leg, but his faint hopes were
dashed after Humphries pinned double eight to go 3-1 ahead. The world number
one was averaging over 126 at this point.
Despite his Grand Slam all-but over, Aspinall was still
hoping to retrieve some pride by winning the match. He got back to 3-2 before
missing two darts to break the throw and level at 3-3. Cool Hand Luke went 4-2
ahead on double 6 before The Asp found the same target to prolong this tie. It would all be in vain with the Humphries securing the win, a damaging result for Aspinall, ending his Grand Slam hopes.
| Luke Humphries | VS | Nathan Aspinall |
|---|---|---|
| 104 | Average (3 Darts) | 100.01 |
| 10 | 100+ Thrown | 5 |
| 6 | 140+ Thrown | 5 |
| 3 | 180 Thrown | 5 |
| 129 | Highest Checkout | 54 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 44.4 | Checkout percentage | 33.3 |
| 4 / 9 | Checkout | 3 / 9 |
Smith joins Humphries in last-16
Before this, Smith defeated Alex Spellman to boost his
chances of advancing. Three breaks of throw commenced the match. Smith looked
like he had the advantage but was instantly pegged back by The Jackal after the
2022 champion missed doubles to extend his lead. Bully Boy would restore his break
advantage. His throw was once more under threat after Spellman left double 12 to
make it 3-3 but fluffed his lines. Smith pinned tops the first time of asking
to put himself one away. He confidently took out 96 in two darts to grab the win
he needed to keep his hopes alive.
Price, Schindler confirm places in knockout stage
ADVERTISEMENT
Gerwyn Price sealed top spot in Group D after a rampant 5-1 victory
over Stefan Bellmont in a winner takes all clash. It could have been a
different match if the Swiss number one took his chances in the first and third
leg on throw. He missed on the outer ring and was punished by Price who was
clinical on the doubles. The only time he could not find the target was for a
ton+ finish. A 128 and 144 outshot was one dart from completion, with a dart
wiring double 12 for a 141 checkout a match dart missed. Bellmont pinned double
eight to prolong the inevitable. The Welshman finished the match averaging over
a ton.
Read also
On the sixth attempt, Martin Schindler has made it out of
the group phase after defeating Alexis Toylo 5-2. Whoever won the match would go
through, with the other being sent home. The Wall became close acquaintances
with double 10, finding it three times to go 3-1 ahead. A 100 checkout for an
11-darter put Schindler within touching distance of the last-16. He repeated the
outshot two legs later to seal second in Group C and a spot in the knockout
stage.
While Schindler made it through, Damon Heta was not so
fortunate after losing 5-3 to Jurjen van der Velde. It was a very nervy start
to a hugely important clash, with 16 darts being missed in the first leg alone.
The young Dutchman got over the line to begin seven consecutive holds of throw.
This was troubling news for the Aussie who needed a break to win. He missed a
brace of doubles to go 3-2 up with van der Velde showing him how it is done on
double eight. A showstopping 108 checkout from the 22-year-old moved him 4-3
ahead of his opponent. The two-time quarter-finalist had the chance to force a
last-leg decider but once more missed two doubles on the outer ring. He was not
afforded another chance. Van der Velde kept his composure and dumped The Heat out,
progressing on debut into the last-16 in the process.
| Gerwyn Price | VS | Stefan Bellmont |
|---|---|---|
| 98.7 | Average (3 Darts) | 83.49 |
| 12 | 100+ Thrown | 9 |
| 2 | 140+ Thrown | 0 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 1 |
| 87 | Highest Checkout | 25 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 38.5 | Checkout percentage | 20 |
| 5 / 13 | Checkout | 1 / 5 |
ADVERTISEMENT
Wade and Bunting exit with contrasting results
James Wade ended his Grand Slam campaign with a 5-2 triumph
over Ricky Evans. Wade was averaging over 108 in the early stages, and he was
rewarded with a break of throw to go 3-1 ahead. Evans missed a darts at top
just before this, ruthlessly being punished. He was not able to recover from
this setback, and The Machine clinched his first victory of this year’s event. This
defeat means Evans finishes second in Group B in a successful return to
Wolverhampton.
The same could not be said for Stephen Bunting who once more
squandered a chance to win the match in a 5-4 defeat to Luke Woodhouse. In the entire
tournament, Woodhouse had missed only four darts on the outer ring. He matched
that tally in the first leg with Bunting instantly clinching a break. He
replied by putting the match back on throw before two more legs saw him go 3-1
up. The Bullet’s conversion rate on the outer ring helped him get back into the
match ahead of a tense last-leg decider. Bunting almost won it with a 156 but could
not find the double 18 segment. Woodhouse finished the job on double two, and
tops Group C while Bunting sits bottom.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Chris Dobey comfortably defeated last year’s finalist Martin
Lukeman 5-1. While it was not a high-quality match by any means, Dobey was good
enough to get through it and confirm top spot in Group B with relative ease.
| Stephen Bunting | VS | Luke Woodhouse |
|---|---|---|
| 95.4 | Average (3 Darts) | 92.29 |
| 8 | 100+ Thrown | 5 |
| 5 | 140+ Thrown | 4 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 58 | Highest Checkout | 84 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 40 | Checkout percentage | 33.3 |
| 4 / 10 | Checkout | 5 / 15 |

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







