PDC World Darts Championship Round-Up | Rob Cross reels in the big fish to seal spot in round two while Ryan Searle races past Landman
PDC2018 world champion Rob Cross was back in the winning enclosure after a 3-0 victory over Cor Dekker in the first round of the PDC World Darts Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cross was the first to settle in the match, much more
clinical on the doubles than his Norwegian opponent. He broke the throw in the
first leg after Dekker missed chances to hold and extended his lead after going
five into the perfect leg. Dekker continued to struggle on the outer ring as ‘Voltage’
sealed the first set, looking back to his old self.
He made it four legs on the spin before Dekker finally found
his range on the outer ring, specifically on double 10. He took the lead in the
second set after accidentally finding tops to leave double 10 once more.
However, he could not wrap up the set after Cross upped the levels. He broke
instantly back before a routine 17-darter secured the second set.
It would take an almighty effort from Dekker to reverse his fortunes on debut. After being broken, he had a sole darts on tops to put the match back on throw but failed to take this opportunity. Cross edged ahead before leaving 170 for the match. After finding the two mandatory treble 20's, he pinned the bull to reel in the big fish and seal a spot in the second round of the PDC World Darts Championship.
Searle marches on
Ryan Searle was wasting no time in defeating Chris Landman
3-0, as his World Championship hopes get off to the perfect start. The first
set was over in record timing. This was partly due to the pace of the event but
also because Searle was in a rampant mood. While not at his very best, he was
still able to win every leg to propel into the lead.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
He left the stage shaking his head, but his level continued
to rise after the set. The Englishman took out 87 in two for a fourth leg on
the spin. Landman had upped his level and was looking to get himself back into
this tie. He could do nothing about Searle getting himself set darts, even if
he did not know about it. Searle found the treble 19 to leave double 19, but
after missing outside he went back up to the 20’s, thinking that he missed the
treble. It would prove costly as Landman drew level for a decider, but an
11-darter from Searle was more than enough for the set.
While there was a drop off in form in the third set, Searle
was more than good enough to hold off the Dutchman, who had doubles in every
set but was only able to covert one of them. These misses would prove to be
costly as Searle ruthlessly punished him, pinning his favourite tops for the
match. Searle moves on, but for Landman his hopes of retaining his tour card have
been extinguished with this first round exit.
| Ryan Searle | VS | Chris Landman |
|---|---|---|
| 93.29 | Average (3 Darts) | 85.59 |
| 14 | 100+ Thrown | 15 |
| 6 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 1 |
| 87 | Highest Checkout | 80 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 47.4 | Checkout percentage | 27.3 |
| 9 / 19 | Checkout | 3 / 11 |
King fails to deliver on Ally Pally return
It was a low-quality matchup between two icons of the sport,
with Ian White surviving a potential comeback from Mervyn King to win 3-2. A
whole heap of experience was on the stage, but that does not mean there would
be nerves and sloppiness. This was presented at the end of the first set when
after missing the big number, King spurned seven darts to keep him in the set.
White, who also missed his chances, eventually secured the lead on double two.
ADVERTISEMENT
‘Diamond’ would stamp his authority on the match by winning
all three legs in the second set. It was not as easy as it may have looked with
doubles proving to be challenging for both players. Out of the 33 darts at a
double in the first two sets, just seven found their intended target.
The quality would not increase in the third set, but King
would not mind as he clawed his way back into the match. From 2-1 down, he took
out 64 in three before finding a timely 180 to set himself up on double 12. Two
darts later he was in the madhouse but the experience shone as he found the
green bit to prolong this clash. His level continued to rise in the fourth set.
Despite going 2-0 down, he stuck around with some much-improved finishing to
level affairs. This was completed after White missed a solitary match dart at
double 12. This, however, would not matter as he took a 2-0 lead in the fifth
and deciding set before taking one of his match darts to send him into round
two.
Zonnelevd finishes with a bang
Niels Zonneveld proved to be too good for Haupai Puha,
winning 3-0. The first two sets were a complete contrast of one another. It
would be five holds with them not able to get close to breaking. The highlight
was a 12-darter from Puha after a nervy start to force a decider. Tripple Z
kept the trend going before letting out a huge cheer as he wrapped up the first
set. The second set would be a plethora of breaks. Puha did brilliantly to
recover, but sloppy darts at the end saw the Dutchman run away and take a 2-0
set advantage.
ADVERTISEMENT
‘Hopes’ would not get close to making a comeback. Zonneveld upped
the gears, taking out a terrific 158 checkout to close in on a second win on
the Ally Pally stage. He completed this by pinning tops with an average of 115
in that third and final set. The Dutchman will face off against Michael Smith
in the second round.
| Niels Zonneveld | VS | Haupai Puha |
|---|---|---|
| 92.68 | Average (3 Darts) | 86.41 |
| 13 | 100+ Thrown | 17 |
| 11 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 3 | 180 Thrown | 3 |
| 158 | Highest Checkout | 100 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 36 | Checkout percentage | 28.6 |
| 9 / 25 | Checkout | 4 / 14 |

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






