Players Championship 2 Round-up | Wessel Nijman wins fourth PDC title as he defeats an outstanding Gerwyn Price in majestic final showdown
PDC
Gerwyn Price produced one of the best Players Championship performances in the second day of action in the 2026 season, consistently averaging way over a ton. However, even this was not enough to stop Wessel Nijman take glory in Hildesheim in a thrilling 8-7 victory in a world class final.
ADVERTISEMENT
Out of the last eight Players Championship semi-finals,
Nijman has featured in five of them in an outstanding spurt of form. This goes
from the final six events of last year, where he took home two titles, and
today with another mesmerising day of darts from the 25-year-old.
He improved throughout the day as he took down Viktor
Tingstrom (6-2), Samuel Price (6-1) before defeating Cor Dekker (6-2) while
averaging 104. Wins over Tommy Morris (6-4) and Carl Sneyd (6-2) followed with
a 106.03 average in that quarter-final. His third ton+ average of the day came
in the semi-final triumph against Ryan Searle, where from 2-0 down Nijman
ticked off seven consecutive legs to place himself in the final.
Price came into today as the number one seed, having been
utterly dominant on the floor last year. Four titles from six finals were a great
return, and he was looking to already get another one on the board.
He was quick off the mark in taking out Kim Huybrechts 6-0
with a 102.48 average as he followed that with wins over Stephen Burton (6-2)
and Cristo Reyes (6-2). From this point on, it gets a bit ridiculous.
Read also
‘The Iceman’ averaged 111.14 to win over a defiant Luke Woodhouse
before the performance of the day came with a 117.12 average in a 6-0 whitewash
of none other than Michael van Gerwen, who had also been looking impressive up
to this point. Krzysztof Ratajski put up a good fight but a 7-4 triumph for
Price with his average still firmly above 104 was enough to edge him in the
final.
Tight opening stages
ADVERTISEMENT
Price won PC2 last year against Chris Dobey and was looking
to defend that title. Up until the final he had an average to 105.21. He almost
had the chance to continue this rich vein of form with a 126 checkout but
missed the bull. Nijman cleaned up on double 16 to hold.
The 2021 world champion set himself up on the bull for a
huge 170 outshot but opted to plant a dart in single 10. He came back to nail his
favourite tops before Nijman streaked ahead and took the lead once more.

Gerwyn Price passionately celebrating on stage
He extended this a leg later. On 112, Price tried to force a
dart through to treble 18 to leave tops but a bounce out allowed Nijman the
chance to break. He took out 42 on double 18 to sneak further ahead with a
critical break. He could have streaked out to a 4-1 lead, but it was his turn
to miss the bull for a 126 checkout. Price took out 60 in two to break straight
back.
The first ton+ checkout of the match went for Price who did
it in some style, taking out 144 to level up the match again. Doubling was off
the charts, and now the scoring was moving up the levels as Price and Nijman
started to batter the treble 20. Nijman missed double four on the outside and a
maximum from Price put the pressure on. It looked like he was going to have a
go at double 14 after Nijman squandered another two darts on double four, but the
green bit was eventually found to take a 4-3 lead.
ADVERTISEMENT
Price replied with a 95 checkout on tops with the Dutchman
lurking closely behind. He had a chance to take the lead for the first time in
the match with a show stopping 134 outshot with two tops. Nijman kept his cool
and pinned the double 16 segment and took the lead again. A solid response from
Price took the score to 5-5, with a need for a break becoming more and more
urgent with the conclusion rapidly approaching.
Read also
Price thought he had the advantage, but Nijman fights back
He would do this a leg later, and in some fashion. A 121
checkout on the bull saw him take the lead for the first time in the match. He
was averaging around 109 at this point but would find himself still not out of
sight from his opponent as Nijman utilised the bull to set up double 16. He
pinned the segment the second time of asking and put the final back on throw.
Price could not have done much more. He averaged 107,41 and
pinned 78% of his doubles. In the end, it was not enough as Nijman stood firm
on his throw, limiting Price’s chances as he leaves Hildesheim number one in
the Players Championship Order of Merit.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nine-darters and big names falling
There were two nine darters throughout the day, backing up
Mickey Mansell’s moment of brilliance in the first event. First was James
Hurrell in a first round win over Maik Kuivenhoven before Gabriel Clemens also struck
perfection while averaging over 108 in a tremendous display against Madars
Razma.
Read also
It was a disappointing day for the two Players Championship
1 finalists, with Nathan Aspinall losing in his first round match 6-4 against Niall
Culleton while the champion James Wade was one of three big players to lose a
last-leg decider in the last-16, with Rob Cross and Gary Anderson also falling
at this stage by the same result.
Gian van Veen was one of three Premier League players to feature,
with a 6-2 loss to Razma in the opening round ending his days work. Premier
League talents such as Luke Littler and Stephen Bunting have not made the trip
over to Hildesheim with the rest of the field capitalising. A good shift from
Danny Noppert and Dave Chisnall who made it to the quarter-final stage, while
concerns continue to loom over Peter Wright who makes it back-to-back first
round exits.
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








