"Nothing really happened, otherwise I'd have been in the papers every week with Taylor" - Michael van Gerwen says Littler-Van Veen incident blown out of proportion
PDC
Michael van Gerwen has dismissed the recent incident between Gian van Veen and Luke Littler in Manchester as overblown, insisting such moments are part and parcel of top-level darts.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speaking ahead of his Premier League return in Rotterdam, the Dutchman made it clear he has little interest in fuelling the narrative. A lot has been made about the incident and he said it is no comparison even to ones back in his pomp with Phil Taylor that weren't reported on.
He gave a warning about the questioning saying that he wouldn't bow down to what the reporters in question speaking in his pre Rotterdam media wanted to achieve as he prepares to face off against Jonny Clayton who leads the table after a terrific return to the format.
“Listen, you all know there have been a million incidents over the years,” Van Gerwen said. “People like to make a story out of it. People love to write about things, try to make them bigger and try to get answers out of you.
“I’ve done enough interviews to know what you want to hear from me, but I’m not going to say it. Nothing really happened. Otherwise, I’d have been in the papers every week with Phil Taylor. It’s also emotion. Things like that happen.”
Returning home to Rotterdam
While the headlines may focus elsewhere, Van Gerwen’s attention is on performing in front of a home crowd that continues to demand the highest standards. “We don’t play that often in Holland on the big stage, only a few times a year,” he said. “When the fans are coming, of course there’s more pressure on your shoulders. That’s part of it.
ADVERTISEMENT
“You want to give them something extra and do well in front of your own crowd. Most of the time you’ve got extra guests coming as well, so it all adds to it.”
Despite sharing the Rotterdam spotlight with another Dutchman in Gian van Veen this year, Van Gerwen does not believe it changes the dynamic.
“I don’t think that matters,” he said. “We had it before with myself and Raymond. It’s just part of it.”
The three-time world champion heads into Night 11 on the back of a solid week in Brighton, although he admits he could be in an even stronger position in the table.
“If I’m critical, I should have had three, four, maybe five points extra,” he said. “That’s not the case, so you need to keep battling and grafting. Every game is important. You need to make sure you’re in the top four and get to the O2, it’s as simple as that.”
ADVERTISEMENT
That race for the play-offs is tighter than usual this season, something Van Gerwen believes adds to the spectacle. “It’s definitely good for the crowd,” he said. “Most years it’s not this close, but this year it is. There’s a lot at stake in every game.”
Van Gerwen also acknowledged the increased competition within the Premier League field, with the likes of Gian van Veen and Josh Rock making their mark.
“They both deserve it,” he said. “Of course you can debate other players being in or out, but that’s not up to me.”
The burden of Dutch darts
He has been particularly impressed with compatriot Van Veen, who will experience his first Premier League night on home soil in Rotterdam. “He’s a fantastic player and a great guy as well,” Van Gerwen said. “He’s a credit to the sport. For him, the most important thing is to enjoy yourself. I remember my first time, you need to enjoy that moment. It’s a magical moment.”
ADVERTISEMENT
For Van Gerwen himself, the expectations of a Dutch crowd remain as high as ever, even if he admits circumstances have changed compared to his peak years.
“They expect a lot because they know what I’m capable of. In the past I raised the bar so high for myself,” he said. “But times have changed a bit. Everything is different now. I don’t expect the same from myself as five or ten years ago, but I know what I’m capable of, and that makes it hard sometimes.”
Handling that pressure is something he admits is not always straightforward. “Of course that happens,” he said, when asked if it can feel overwhelming. “That’s the most difficult thing to handle when the pressure is really high.”
His love for the game, however, remains unchanged. “I still love what I do. I still love to perform on the stages and that’s the only thing that matters for me.”
Van Gerwen returns home to Rotterdam tonight.
ADVERTISEMENT
Erasing Clayton pain
On the oche, Van Gerwen faces a resurgent Jonny Clayton in Rotterdam, fresh from a run of strong results. “If you look at his performances in the last week, everything goes his way in the Premier League,” he said. “People are missing match darts against him, he’s on fire. Fair play to him, but I need to make sure I stop him in Holland.”
That clash comes shortly after a painful defeat to Clayton, where Van Gerwen squandered a 5–2 lead and missed multiple match darts, although he remains philosophical about the result. “If you look through my week, I think the final was probably my best game,” he said. “I didn’t do myself any justice there, but it is what it is. Don’t be too harsh on yourself, there’s still a long way to go.”
External factors, including venue conditions such as airflow in Rotterdam, are not something he is looking to overthink.
“I hope they do as much as possible to make sure it’s playable,” he said. “I think it is possible, so we’ll see what happens.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Gerwen also reiterated his long-standing stance on the Premier League format, admitting it is not his preferred system but accepting it is out of his control.
He also shared his frustration as such for having the questioning constantly when it is often the narrative surrounding this format. Van Gerwen has reiterated in the past that he only cares about the rankings and not Premier League.
“I’ve said for a few years it’s not my preferred format,” he said. “But I’m not the organisation. I’m here to play darts and try to win as much as possible.
“As long as you win the title, you don’t care how you get there, but I still like to enjoy myself week after week.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He is also firmly against expanding the competition beyond its current elite structure.
“You need to keep it for the best of the best,” he said. “If you extend it, you lose the glamour of that little group.”
Not caring what others think
As always, Van Gerwen remains aware of the shifting narratives around his form, but insists he is unfazed by outside opinion. While he admits he isn't much of a fan of the Premier League format, he hopes he is written off in general compared to the other top names as it only makes him do the talking when he proves them wrong.
He said that all he can do is make sure that he does it his way and not caring about the opinion of others when it comes down to it.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I hope they write me off. I hope they underestimate me,” he said. “But I just need to make sure I do the talking myself.”
And when it comes to the performances of others, including Littler, his focus remains firmly inward.
“I have to do what I have to do, and what other people do is not up to me.”
Returning home to Rotterdam for a yearly visit, he is prepared as ever to put on a show and give everyone what they've paid for in front of a sea of Orange at the Ahoy.
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026