“Negativity sells more than positivity” - Matthew Edgar takes aim at clickbait and distortion in modern darts
PDC
In the modern world of darts, it is no longer just about trebles and doubles. The sport continues to grow, professionalise and reach a wider audience than ever before. But that rise has brought complications too.
ADVERTISEMENT
In a candid conversation with Online Darts, former professional turned coach and analyst Matthew Edgar offered a clear-eyed assessment of where darts media currently stands, and he did not hold back.
Coaching boom reflects rising standards
Edgar now operates across multiple roles within the sport, and he is seeing its evolution up close. Not all of it, he admits, is positive. “The start of this year has been crazy. Coaching’s gone through the roof,” he explained.
Where coaching was once largely associated with beginners, Edgar now sees a shift across the board. Players at every level, from grassroots amateurs to professionals, are investing in improving their game.
That, in itself, says a lot about the current level of darts. Standards are higher than ever, and the margins are increasingly fine. For Edgar, it has also meant adjusting his own workload. “You may not see me as much out there doing the punditry side… I’ve just narrowed the other bits down a little bit because the backlog is mad. I’m still fully booked for a few months.”
Read also
Debate turns personal in modern media landscape
ADVERTISEMENT
The conversation soon turned to a recent media storm, sparked by content creator Charlie Murphy suggesting that Luke Humphries was not the current world number two, a comment that quickly escalated online.
Edgar followed the situation closely, not to join the debate, but to understand it. “One thing I’ll say straight away is I didn’t like how personal it got towards Charlie Murphy. There were a lot of personal, derogatory comments thrown his way for what was essentially just an opinion he had at the time.”
For Edgar, disagreement is part of the sport. Rankings, performances and form are constantly debated, and rightly so. “It’s okay to believe that… but that’s the point — you need those things to back up that argument.”
He points out that alternative views are common, with players like Gerwyn Price and Gian van Veen often mentioned in similar discussions. The issue, in his view, is not the opinion itself, but how it is presented. “If you believe that, just back it up… and then you’ve opened a debate.”
Clickbait culture distorting the narrative
ADVERTISEMENT
For Edgar, the incident is not an isolated one. Instead, it reflects a wider trend within darts media, one he finds increasingly frustrating. “Clickbait is… a problem. Titles are written to get maximum reaction, not to reflect the truth.”
He believes comments are regularly taken out of context, reshaped or shortened in a way that changes their meaning entirely. “I might make a comment or a statement and it gets… recontextualised… and it’s like, that’s not what I was saying.”
That experience has shaped his advice to fans. “If you read a headline, before having the pile-on attitude, go watch the actual footage. Don’t let somebody else tell you about somebody else’s opinion.”

Matthew Edgar is a former professional darter and now works as a commentator and analyst
Negativity drives engagement — but at a cost
ADVERTISEMENT
At the heart of the issue, Edgar believes, is a simple reality about modern media. “Negativity sells more than positivity.”
It is a dynamic seen across sport and entertainment, where controversy generates attention, engagement and ultimately revenue. Edgar understands why it happens, but he also warns about its long-term impact. “I think sometimes things are being promoted from a negative spin rather than what they are.”
For someone who values storytelling, that is where the line should be drawn. Edgar is not against debate, analysis or secondary content, far from it. But for him, those elements must remain grounded in reality. “I love stories… but let’s keep them factual and as they are.”
Read also
Social media, not darts itself, is the driver
ADVERTISEMENT
With darts enjoying unprecedented popularity, it would be easy to assume that this shift in media tone is simply a byproduct of the sport’s success. Edgar sees it differently. “It’s a byproduct of social media and monetisation, realistically.”
The sport’s biggest event, the World Championship, generates huge numbers, but only for a limited period each year. Outside of that window, content creators and media outlets are under pressure to find stories that attract attention. “Negativity sells, so people are trying to find a form of negativity… and that becomes the story.”
High-profile names, particularly Luke Littler, only amplify that effect. Mentioning them almost guarantees traction and, in turn, increases the temptation to shape narratives for impact rather than accuracy.
Small details, big difference in storytelling
Edgar’s frustrations extend beyond clickbait headlines. He also takes issue with what he sees as lazy language in coverage. “What I hate is when they say ‘former world champion’.”
ADVERTISEMENT
To him, that phrasing strips away important context. “Why can’t you give them the credit of the title they earned? Say ‘two-time world champion’, ‘2017 world champion’.”
It is a small detail, but one that matters, particularly for newer fans trying to understand the sport. “If you say ‘2024 world champion’, someone new instantly knows he’s a recent world champion. If you just say ‘former’, it just dumps it all in the past.”
Keeping darts grounded as it grows
Despite his concerns, Edgar remains optimistic about the future of darts. The sport is expanding, the standard continues to rise, and interest shows no signs of slowing.
But with that growth comes responsibility, particularly for those shaping its narrative. “I just want it to be done correctly… we don’t need to sensationalise everything. Let’s sell this on story.”
ADVERTISEMENT
For fans, his message is just as clear. In an era of constant content and instant reaction, critical thinking matters more than ever. “Don’t let somebody else tell you about somebody else’s opinion… go watch it.”
Because only then, Edgar suggests, can you truly understand what is actually happening in the sport.
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






