Preview 2026 PDC World Darts Championship Final: First for Gian van Veen or back-to-back history for Luke Littler?
PDC
The World Darts Championship reaches its climax this Saturday evening. Of the 128 players who began the tournament on December 11, only two remain. After tonight we will know who the 2026 world champion is.
ADVERTISEMENT
And what a final we are getting. Our very own Dutchman Gian van Veen faces none other than 18-year-old Luke Littler in the title match. Will “The Giant” become world champion for the first time in his career, or will “The Nuke” successfully defend last year’s crown?
Saturday, 01/03
Evening session (from 8:00 PM)
| 8:15 PM | Luke Littler | v | Gian van Veen | Final |
Van Veen: the challenger
Gian van Veen is playing a phenomenal tournament so far. The Dutchman faced serious resistance multiple times, but handled it all and powered his way to the final in convincing fashion. It started in the first round against the experienced Spaniard Cristo Reyes. Van Veen averaged almost 99 right out of the gate, and that was needed as Reyes pushed hard with just over 96. Van Veen impressed early and raced into a 2-0 lead after taking the first two sets 3-1 and then even 3-0. It still got tense when Reyes pulled it back to 2-1 and a deciding leg was needed in set four. Those deciders, as became clear later in the tournament, might well be the Dutchman’s calling card. He took that leg convincingly and booked his place in round two.
There he met Scotsman Alan Soutar, who produced a surprisingly strong display. “Soots” boldly took the lead and won the first set 3-1. He then moved 2-1 up in the second set, but Van Veen battled back brilliantly to snatch it. From that point the engine kicked in, he rattled off six straight legs and blew Soutar off the stage. He closed with an average of over 108. That performance earned him a third-round tie with Latvian Madars Razma. It wasn’t as spectacular as against Soutar, but it didn’t need to be as Razma managed only an 89 average. The Dutchman strolled through, moving 3-0 up in sets with relative ease. After Razma showed some resistance by taking the fourth, Van Veen dominated set five 3-0 to qualify for the quarterfinals.
There he faced 20-year-old debutant Charlie Manby. The Englishman held his own in the first two sets, leaving the scores level. But sets three and four went convincingly to “The Giant,” leaving him one set from victory. It got tight in the next, yet Van Veen won it via a deciding fifth leg to move into the last eight. That turned into an absolute thriller. In the quarterfinal he met Luke Humphries, and he hurt the world number two at exactly the right moments. In set one he deployed his tournament trademark by winning a deciding fifth leg, and after Humphries took set two he did the exact same in set three. He then took the fourth set 3-1, before once again claiming the decider in set five to lead 4-1 in sets. That broke Humphries for good, and Van Veen also won set six to beat the former world champion 5-1.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
In his semifinal he finally faced Scottish legend Gary Anderson, and it turned into a real spectacle. Both men were superb, each finishing around a 103 average. They broke each other early to make it 1-1, and in the next two sets Van Veen did what he had done all tournament: win the deciding fifth legs. That put him 3-1 ahead, and in set five he again took the last leg to go 4-1 up. Anderson kept fighting and clawed back to 4-3. The final two sets again went to a fifth leg, and as expected it was Van Veen who took both, sealing a 6-3 win to reach his first World Darts Championship final.
Van Veen has repeatedly sealed sets this Worlds by taking the deciding fifth leg.
Littler: the favorite
Luke Littler has barely been tested at this Worlds. In his opener he faced Lithuanian Darius Labanauskas, averaged just over 101, and didn’t drop a set. In round two he met Welshman David Davies and did have to work harder. Davies threw well with a 95 average, but failed to hurt Littler. He had chances to take the first set, and could have made life tougher for “The Nuke” in set two as well. He didn’t take them, and the 18-year-old still moved 2-0 ahead. He then swept the third set to close out another 3-0 win.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the third round he then produced a masterful display against Mensur Suljovic. With nine 180s and an average of over 107, he gave the Austrian no chance to get into the match. In total he dropped only four legs, and once again he won without losing a set. The fourth round, however, would be different. There he faced former world champion Rob Cross. Littler moved into a relatively comfortable 3-1 lead in sets and looked set for an easy night, but Cross began to offer some resistance. He fought back well to 3-2 and missed a single chance in the sixth set to level at 3-3. “The Nuke” capitalized on that miss to close out the match and win 4-2 to reach the quarterfinals.
Read also
In that quarterfinal it was one-way traffic again. He faced the Pole Krzysztof Ratajski, and although the first set was still tight at 3-2 in his favor, the next two sets both went 3-0 to Littler. Set four was more evenly matched, but once more Littler took it 3-2 to move 4-0 ahead. He then wrapped it up in the fifth set to cruise into the semifinals with a 5-0 win. There he met surprise semifinalist Ryan Searle. “Heavy Metal” stayed with him early and even nicked the opening set. But that was as far as it went. Littler leveled at 1-1, then put in a short burst to pull away and seemed to have broken Searle right there. The Englishman failed to win another set, allowing Littler to book a third straight final with a 6-1 victory.
Looking at the head-to-head between Littler and Van Veen, we can expect a tight final. The Dutchman is one of the few players on the Pro Tour who does not have a losing record against the 18-year-old. The pair have met eight times in total, with both Littler and Van Veen winning four of those encounters. They have already faced each other five times this year alone, four of which were on TV. Of those five matches, Littler won one more than Van Veen. But looking at the four televised meetings, it’s tied at 2-2. Let’s hope we really do get a tense and entertaining final tonight!

Littler can become only the fourth player ever to defend his world title.
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








