Preview Saturday afternoon PDC World Darts Championship: Van Duijvenbode, Chisnall and crowd favourite Sakai return to Ally Pally
PDC
All first-round matches at the 2026 PDC World Darts Championship have been completed, and this Saturday, December 20, we immediately dive into the first ties of the second round. This afternoon session already features a Dutchman, plus a debutant who instantly became a crowd favorite.
ADVERTISEMENT
The first second-round match this Worlds pits “Heavy Metal” Ryan Searle against Northern Irishman Brendan Dolan. Then it’s time for two surprise packages: Andreas Harrysson meets the colorful Motomu Sakai. In the third match, Dirk van Duijvenbode takes on James Hurrell. Finally, we get Dave Chisnall against German Ricardo Pietreczko.
2026 World Darts Championship schedule
Saturday, December 20
Afternoon session (from 12:30 PM)
| 12:40 PM | Ryan Searle | v | Brendan Dolan | R2 |
| 1:40 PM | Andreas Harrysson | v | Motomu Sakai | R2 |
| 2:40 PM | Dirk van Duijvenbode | v | James Hurrell | R2 |
| 3:40 PM | Dave Chisnall | v | Ricardo Pietreczko | R2 |
Ryan Searle v Brendan Dolan
The first second-round match is Ryan Searle versus Brendan Dolan. Searle swept aside Dutchman Chris Landman 3-0 in his opener and faced little resistance from his compatriot. Searle himself impressed, averaging over 93 with a checkout rate close to 50%. The pace of that match suited “Heavy Metal,” who likes to keep the throw flowing, and Landman proved the perfect opponent for that. Against Dolan it will be different, as the Northern Irishman is known for a slightly slower tempo.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Dolan, for his part, saw off Tavis Dudeney 3-1 in round one, though it was less straightforward. “The History Maker” cruised through the first set, but had to work harder thereafter. In the decider of set two he produced a superb 170 checkout to move 2-0 up. Dudeney pulled a set back, and after Dolan missed a wagonload of doubles in set four, he eventually managed to close it out and reach round two. He did have a bit of luck that Dudeney wasn’t clinical on the outer ring. On paper, Searle will be the strong favorite to reach the third round, but with Dolan you never quite know. He can spring a surprise.
Andreas Harrysson v Motomu Sakai
Then we get a match to relish. The long-bearded Swede Andreas Harrysson takes on one of Ally Pally’s new crowd favorites: Motomu Sakai. Harrysson delivered one of the first shocks of this Worlds by beating 12th seed Ross Smith 3-2 in his opener. It was a tense affair with almost every session going to a deciding leg, and “Dirty Harry” proved the cooler finisher. He averaged over 93 with a 46% checkout rate.
And then his opponent: Motomu Sakai. The colorful Japanese player who instantly won over Alexandra Palace with his walk-on. Dancing, he whipped up the crowd and a new cult hero was born. But beyond the flamboyant look and moves, he also played well. He laid down a marker in set one with 78 and 121 bullseye checkouts, and in set two he added finishes of 86 and 148. He beat his French opponent Thibault Tricole 3-0 with relative ease. On paper, Andreas Harrysson is a slight favorite due to his greater experience and the question of whether Sakai can reproduce that level. One thing is certain: the Japanese debutant shows no stage fright and will undoubtedly turn it into another party this afternoon.
Sakai instantly became a fan favorite at Ally Pally with his walk-on and quality play.
ADVERTISEMENT
Dirk van Duijvenbode v James Hurrell
Then it’s time for the “Aubergenius” Dirk van Duijvenbode, who faces James Hurrell in his second-round tie. Van Duijvenbode himself won’t be satisfied with his opener, a labored 3-2 victory over Belgian Andy Baetens, though there were positives. The Dutchman started well, taking the first set convincingly, but his level dipped and he fell 2-1 behind. He dug in and, with 106 and 109 checkouts in set four, forced a decider. In that set he showed his class. He started with a 170 checkout in 12 darts and clinched it with a 102 finish. He will want to carry the feeling from those last two sets into this match.
There he meets Englishman James Hurrell, which normally should not pose a major problem for Van Duijvenbode. Hurrell won his opener 3-1 against American Stowe Buntz, averaging just over 88. He could, however, have been 2-0 down early on, while Buntz wasn’t stellar either. Normally Van Duijvenbode should win this comfortably, but he needs to find the level of his last two sets against Baetens, not that of sets two and three. If he isn’t at his best, he could still be dragged into a battle.

Van Duijvenbode produced a superb final set in his opening match.
Dave Chisnall v Ricardo Pietreczko
ADVERTISEMENT
Finally, it’s Dave Chisnall against Ricardo Pietreczko. Chisnall cruised past Fallon Sherrock 3-0 in his opener and didn’t need to hit top gear. He averaged just under 90 with a checkout rate over 47%, solid numbers for a first round. He faced little resistance from “The Queen of the Palace.”
Pietreczko beat Portuguese player José de Sousa in his first match. The German, however, had to overcome more resistance. He trailed 2-0 in the first set but turned it around impressively to win 3-2. He also took the deciding leg in set two. De Sousa pulled one back to 2-1, but Pietreczko dominated set four to seal it. His stats were similar to Chisnall’s, suggesting this could be very tight.
Much of it will likely depend on “Chizzy.” The Englishman has had a highly erratic year, so it’s a question of how he steps on stage. If he finds his best, we’ll get a real contest. But if he never settles, it could turn into a one-sided win for Pietreczko.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







