
After an action-packed week, only James Wade and Luke Littler remain in contention for overall victory at the World Matchplay. Can veteran Wade win the World Matchplay a second time eighteen years after his first triumph? Or will it still be reigning world champion Luke Littler who wins in Blackpool?
ADVERTISEMENT
The tournament at the Winter Gardens is the second largest ranking tournament of the year. With a prize pool of 800,000 pounds, players can take a big hit in the world rankings. The field of participants at the World Matchplay consists of 32 players. The top 16 of the PDC Order of Merit are seeded in the first round, and the 16 best Pro Tour players complete the lineup.
Follow the 2025 World Matchplay via our live scores!
Follow the 2025 World Matchplay via our live scores!
Luke Humphries began the tournament as the defending champion, having been too strong 18-15 to Dutchman Michael van Gerwen in last year's final. However, 'Cool Hand Luke' will not succeed himself on the honor roll after a 10-8 defeat in the opening round against Gian van Veen.
This year's final will be between Wade and Littler. Wade, for whom it is his twentieth consecutive participation in the World Matchplay, already won the tournament once in 2007, besides that he also lost five finals. For some time now, "The Machine" has had "I'm still standing" as his walk-on song, and that actually sums up his career well. The now 42-year-old Englishman has been at the top of darts for almost 25 years, but is clearly still standing.
Read also
Wade started the tournament as the ninth series leader and immediately impressed in the first round with an average of 104.44 during his 10-3 win against Joe Cullen. In the second round, he maintained that high level and won 11-5 against Dutchman Wessel Nijman. In the quarterfinals another Dutchman, Gian van Veen, was defeated 16-13.

James 'The Machine' Wade
Wonderful semifinals
Then, in the semifinals, we were presented with a great duel between Wade and Clayton. Wade took a 16-10 lead and seemed to have everything under control. Clayton, however, fought back and won six legs in a row to make it 16-16. Wade might have been a bit upset, you would think, but nothing could be further from the truth. The Machine" showed character and won 20-18.
ADVERTISEMENT
Thus, Wade may prepare for his seventh final at the Winter Gardens, the first since 2015. Wade has already won 11 major titles in his career, with only Phil Taylor and Michael van Gerwen doing better.
Player Details: James Wade
| Total Earnings: | £4,868,706 |
| Darts: | |
| Order of Merit: | 10 |
| 9 Darters: | 11 |
| Tour Card Years: | 14 |
| Highest Average: | 115.92 |
| Highest TV Average: | 114.73 |
In the final, Wade will meet the 24-year-old Littler. 'The Nuke' opened the year great with his first world title, immediately becoming the youngest darts world champion ever. Littler won his second major of the year with the UK Open in early March. Afterwards, by his high standards, it all fell apart. Littler did reach the final of the Premier League Darts, but especially the World Cup of Darts turned out to be a big disappointment. Alongside Luke Humphries, he lost on behalf of England in the opening match against Germany.
Doubts
Moreover, Littler started this edition of the World Matchplay with the necessary doubts, having lost immediately in the opening round against Michael van Gerwen on his debut last year. However, Littler got off to an excellent start this year, winning in the opening round - with an average of almost 109, no one did better - with impressive 10-2 figures from Ryan Searle.

Luke 'The Nuke' Littler
ADVERTISEMENT
A true thriller followed in the second round, however. Littler was pushed to the limit by Jermaine Wattimena, but eventually won 13-11. Also in the quarter-finals Littler faced a lot of opposition. Andrew Gilding kept pushing for a long time, but Littler kept his composure and won 16-14.
So Littler got to take on that other top talent, Josh Rock, in the semifinals. The 24-year-old Northern Irishman, winner of the World Cup of Darts last month alongside Daryl Gurney, started the match like a whirlwind, going into the first break up 5-0. By the second break, however, Littler had already rallied back to 7-3 and then steamed on. Littler eventually won 17-14 to qualify for his first final at the World Matchplay.
If both men reach their level of the past week, we can probably look forward to an exciting and high-level final. For Wade, it will be especially important to keep up with Littler scoring and hitting his doubles at a high percentage. Littler on the other hand likes to have a lot of rhythm in a match and against the slower Wade, who also knows the necessary tricks to unbalance his opponent, he will not get that rhythm. So it remains to be seen how he handles that.
Player Details: Luke Littler
| Total Earnings: | £1,941,865 |
| Order of Merit: | 2 |
| 9 Darters: | 8 |
| Tour Card Years: | 1 |
| Highest Average: | 122.96 |
| Highest TV Average: | 115.96 |
Results World Matchplay 2025:
ADVERTISEMENT
| Schedule of Play |
|---|
|
Saturday July 19 First Round Evening Session (1900 BST) James Wade (104.44) 10-3 (95.76) Joe Cullen Danny Noppert (96.44) 10-2 (81.35) Cameron Menzies Luke Humphries (95.69) 8-10 (98.45) Gian van Veen Nathan Aspinall (98.88) 6-10 (101.72) Wessel Nijman |
|
Sunday July 20 First Round Afternoon Session (1300 BST) Damon Heta (100.03) 10-12 (101.82) Andrew Gilding Rob Cross (96.1) 8-10 (95.33) Dirk van Duijvenbode Peter Wright (93.1) 8-10 (91.81) Jermaine Wattimena Dave Chisnall (91.87) 7-10 (93.01) Mike De Decker Evening Session (1900 BST) Gary Anderson (98.02) 10-5 (94.11) Luke Woodhouse Jonny Clayton (99.6) 10-7 (103.45) Martin Schindler Luke Littler (108.92) 10-2 (98.63) Ryan Searle Stephen Bunting (98) 10-8 (93.71) Ryan Joyce |
|
Monday July 21 First Round Evening Session (1900 BST) Chris Dobey (90.95) 10-5 (83.22) Ricardo Pietreczko Gerwyn Price (100.21) 10-7 (98.46) Daryl Gurney Michael van Gerwen (91.84) 10-6 (87.1) Raymond van Barneveld Ross Smith (94.88) 5-10 (104.32) Josh Rock |
|
Tuesday July 22 Second Round Evening Session (1900 BST) Gian van Veen (94.94) 11-5 (94.59) Danny Noppert Wessel Nijman (94.78) 5-11 (102.53) James Wade Stephen Bunting (92.71) 12-10 (91.7) Gary Anderson Jonny Clayton (93.41) 11-8 (92.62) Mike de Decker |
|
Wednesday July 23 Second Round Evening Session (1900 BST) Andrew Gilding (100.5) 11-5 (93.78) Dirk van Duijvenbode Chris Dobey (96.5) 3-11 (108.73) Gerwyn Price Luke Littler (99.28) 13-11 (96.39) Jermaine Wattimena Michael van Gerwen (97.31) 11-13 (95.16) Josh Rock |
|
Thursday July 24 Quarter-Finals Evening Session (2000 BST) Quarter-Finals x2 Gian van Veen (99.24) 13-16 (96.35) James Wade Stephen Bunting (94.97) 7-16 (98.13) Jonny Clayton |
|
Friday July 25 Quarter-Finals Evening Session (2000 BST) Quarter-Finals x2 Luke Littler (103.91) 16-14 (98.45) Andrew Gilding Gerwyn Price (104.02) 11-16 (100.21) Josh Rock |
|
Saturday July 26 Semi-Finals Evening Session (2000 BST) Semi-Finals James Wade (101.79) 20-18 (100.97) Jonny Clayton Luke Littler (107.5) 17-14 (104.15) Josh Rock |

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








