Gerwyn Price will not claim victory at Players Championship 1 today in Barnsley after being dumped out by Jim Williams in the second round today.
ADVERTISEMENT
Williams was clinical in a 6-4 victory despite Price averaging 101. This means also a big chance has opened up at the top of the draw.
'The Quiff' will now face Kim Huybrechts, with Krzysztof Ratajski and James Wade the other main board final. Also in that section include Brian Raman facing Jason Lowe and Ryan Searle taking on Cameron Menzies.
Peter Wright is still in and will face Keane Barry, while the winner of that tie faces Andy Boulton or the surprise package, Scott Williams who has been superb today.
Jonny Clayton faces Mervyn King, while Dimitri van den Bergh takes on Stephen Bunting. Gary Anderson, Jose de Sousa and Michael Smith are also still involved.
As is Michael van Gerwen who will face Daryl Gurney, with Lee Evans or Rowby-John Rodriguez awaiting - this after the former overcame a 5-0 deficit to defeat Rob Cross 6-5.
Another star tie sees Richie Burnett face Joe Cullen, while Luke Humphries is already through to face the winner of Smith and Edhouse after seeing off Kevin Doets 6-2. The other Last 32 clash sees a welcome return to the latter stages for Berry van Peer who faces Dave Chisnall.
ADVERTISEMENT
Results Players Championship 1
Last 128
Gerwyn Price 6 | 1 Mickey Mansell
Jim Williams 6 | 2 Martin Lukeman
Kim Huybrechts 6 | 4 Max Hopp
Ricky Evans 6 | 4 Jose Justicia
Krzysztof Ratajski 6 | 4 Jamie Clark
Jimmy Hendriks 6 | 3 John Henderson
James Wade 6 | 1 Boris Koltsov
Jermaine Wattimena 6 | 4 Steve West
Brian Raman 6 | 4 Brendan Dolan
Ian White 6 | 1 Adam Gawlas
Raymond van Barneveld 6 | 5 Ryan Meikle
Jason Lowe 6 | 3 Darren Webster
Ryan Searle 6 | 3 Geert De Vos
Niels Zonneveld 6 | 4 Connor Scutt
Cameron Menzies 6 | 5 Vincent van der Voort
Luke Woodhouse 6 | 4 Stu Wilson
Peter Wright 6 | 2 Kevin Burness
Jeff Smith 6 | 3 David Evans
Jake Jones 6 | 5 Mensur Suljovic
Keane Barry 6 | 0 Gordon Mathers
Damon Heta 6 | 1 Mario Vandenbogaerde
Andy Boulton 6 | 1 Tony Martinez
Ross Montgomery 6 | 5 Chris Dobey
Scott Williams 6 | 1 Steve Beaton
Jonny Clayton 6 | 3 Boris Krcmar
Ricardo Pietreczko 6 | 0 Damian Mol
Mervyn King 6 | 2 George Killington
Nathan Rafferty 6 | 2 Glen Durrant
Dimitri Van den Bergh 6 | 2 Danny Baggish
Stephen Burton 6 | 4 Nick Fullwell
Stephen Bunting 6 | 2 Andrew Gilding
Alan Soutar 6 | 5 Jim McEwan
Jose de Sousa 6 | 1 Steve Lennon
William O'Connor 6 | 4 Jules van Dongen
Jamie Hughes 6 | 5 Scott Mitchell
Ted Evetts 6 | 3 Martijn Kleermaker
Callan Rydz 6 | 3 James Wilson
Gary Anderson 6 | 4 Darius Labanauskas
Ross Smith 6 | 5 Eddie Lovely
Luc Peters 6 | 1 Shaun Wilkinson
Michael van Gerwen 6 | 2 Lewy Williams
Geert Nentjes 6 | 2 Peter Hudson
Daryl Gurney 6 | 2 Florian Hempel
John O'Shea 6 | 1 Josh Rock
Rob Cross 6 | 2 Simon Whitlock
Lee Evans 6 | 1 William Borland
Martin Schindler 6 | 5 Jon Worsley
Rowby-John Rodriguez 6 | 4 Ron Meulenkamp
Michael Smith 6 | 2 Devon Petersen
Brett Claydon 6 | 1 Adam Hunt
Adrian Lewis 6 | 5 Jack Main
Ritchie Edhouse 6 | 4 Mike De Decker
Luke Humphries 6 | 0 Keegan Brown
Radek Szaganski 6 | 2 Steve Haggerty
Danny Jansen 6 | 4 Gabriel Clemens
Kevin Doets 6 | 4 Jason Heaver
Joe Cullen 6 | 2 Krzysztof Kciuk
Madars Razma 6 | 1 Matt Campbell
Ryan Joyce 6 | 3 Bradley Brooks
Richie Burnett 6 | 4 John Brown
Dirk van Duijvenbode 6 | 3 Maik Kuivenhoven
Berry van Peer 6 | 0 Scott Waites
Dave Chisnall 6 | 4 Joe Murnan
Rusty-Jake Rodriguez 6 | 3 John Michael
Last 64
Jim Williams 6 | 4 Gerwyn Price
Kim Huybrechts 6 | 2 Ricky Evans
Krzysztof Ratajski 6 | 5 Jimmy Hendriks
James Wade 6 | 5 Jermaine Wattimena
Brian Raman 6 | 5 Ian White
Jason Lowe 6 | 2 Raymond van Barneveld
Ryan Searle 6 | 2 Niels Zonneveld
Cameron Menzies 6 | 2 Luke Woodhouse
Peter Wright 6 | 5 Jeff Smith
Keane Barry 6 | 2 Jake Jones
Andy Boulton 6 | 5 Damon Heta
Scott Williams 6 | 1 Ross Montgomery
Jonny Clayton 6 | 2 Ricardo Pietreczko
Mervyn King 6 | 3 Nathan Rafferty
Dimitri Van den Bergh 6 | 1 Stephen Burton
Stephen Bunting 6 | 5 Alan Soutar
Jose de Sousa 6 | 3 William O'Connor
Jamie Hughes 6 | 2 Ted Evetts
Gary Anderson 6 | 2 Callan Rydz
Ross Smith 6 | 2 Luc Peters
Michael van Gerwen 6 | 3 Geert Nentjes
Daryl Gurney 6 | 3 John O'Shea
Lee Evans 6 | 5 Rob Cross
Rowby-John Rodriguez 6 | 3 Martin Schindler
Michael Smith 6 | 2 Brett Claydon
Ritchie Edhouse 6 | 2 Adrian Lewis
Luke Humphries 6 | 2 Radek Szaganski
Kevin Doets 6 | 3 Danny Jansen
Joe Cullen 6 | 1 Madars Razma
Richie Burnett 6 | 5 Ryan Joyce
Berry van Peer 6 | 3 Dirk van Duijvenbode
Dave Chisnall 6 | 4 Rusty-Jake Rodriguez
Last 32
Jim Williams - | - Kim Huybrechts
Krzysztof Ratajski - | - James Wade
Brian Raman - | - Jason Lowe
Ryan Searle - | - Cameron Menzies
Peter Wright - | - Keane Barry
Andy Boulton - | - Scott Williams
Jonny Clayton - | - Mervyn King
Dimitri Van den Bergh - | - Stephen Bunting
Jose de Sousa - | - Jamie Hughes
Gary Anderson - | - Ross Smith
Michael van Gerwen - | - Daryl Gurney
Lee Evans - | - Rowby-John Rodriguez
Michael Smith - | - Ritchie Edhouse
Luke Humphries - | - Kevin Doets
Joe Cullen - | - Richie Burnett
Berry van Peer - | - Dave Chisnall
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026