We are nearing the end of the Premier League Darts. Thursday night it is already time for the fourteenth round of play of this prestigious darts competition. Chances are that some decisions regarding the playoffs will already be made tonight.
ADVERTISEMENT
The cream of darts is visiting Leeds this time, a city in the north of England. A home match for world number one Luke Humphries as such. As he often remarks he was named Luke as a homage to Leeds United Kings (of) Europe. His attendance song I Predict a Riot is also the anthem of Leeds United supporters sang by Kaiser Chiefs also from the city.
Follow the Premier League Darts 2025 via our live scores!
Follow the Premier League Darts 2025 via our live scores!
This city has been part of the lineup since 2014, making it one of the most recently added playing venues. Of the current field of participants, Michael van Gerwen is the only player who was part of the lineup back then.
In the past three editions, we got a different weekly winner in Leeds each time. Michael van Gerwen was the best in 2022, and only had to play two matches to do so. Due to a cancellation of Gary Anderson, 'Mighty Mike' was directly admitted to the semifinals, where he was 6-3 too strong for Peter Wright. He then triumphed 6-1 against James Wade in the final.
A year later, Michael Smith was the best in Leeds. 'Bullyboy' then dealt with Chris Dobey (6-1), Peter Wright (6-2) and Gerwyn Price (6-4). Luke Humphries fully lived up to his home advantage in 2024 by beating Rob Cross (6-1), Michael Smith (6-1 and Michael van Gerwen (6-5) in front of his own crowd.
Read also
Rob Cross v Gerwyn Price
For Rob Cross, it is the last chance to still have a realistic chance of making it to the playoffs. 'Voltage' needs to reach at least the final in Leeds, actually even win the evening to get back into contention. With 14 points, Cross is six points behind the top four.
Gerwyn Price is in much better shape. Two weeks back in Liverpool, 'The Iceman' won his third night of the season, and last week Price made it to the semifinals in Birmingham. Currently, the Welshman is in third place with 22 points. Price is far from there yet, but does have the advantage of a relatively easier schedule than the two players behind him. A win over Cross would mean that he cannot be caught up by the 2018 world champion.
ADVERTISEMENT
It will be the fourth showdown between the two former world champions in this Premier League. Cross won the first two, but the last came to Price's credit. The former rugby player leads 15-13 in the overall head-to-head.
Just like last week in Birmingham, Nathan Aspinall and Luke Littler face each other. Then it was another semi-final, in which 'The Asp' let a 5-4 lead slip out of his hands. With that, Aspinall lost a precious point in the battle for the playoffs, as the Englishman lost his spot in the top four to Michael van Gerwen. Aspinall still has Littler to thank for the fact that 'The Nuke' managed to beat the Dutchman in the final last week.
With his win over Van Gerwen last week, Littler took his fifth weekly title of the league. A record, as never before has a player won five weekly titles in one Premier League season. Littler now has one more goal left, as he wants to break the points record in the league.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
That currently stands at forty, while Littler currently has 35 points behind his name. With that point total, the English teenage sensation has become the first player to secure participation in the playoffs. Moreover, with a title at Leeds, Littler can also assure himself of first place in the final standings.
Meanwhile, Aspinall has a dramatic record against his young compatriot. Of the previous thirteen encounters, the darter from Stockport won only one. This Premier League the balance is 4-0 in Littler's favor, with a leg difference of 24 to 13.

Michael van Gerwen v Luke Humphries
Michael van Gerwen was in the weekly final last week for the second time this competition, but just like earlier in Cardiff, Van Gerwen had to settle for second place. However, he did pick up three important points in the battle for the playoffs, now passing Nathan Aspinall in the standings. Considering the fact that Aspinall plays Luke Littler, Van Gerwen can take a huge step towards the playoffs with a win over Luke Humphries. Especially since Van Gerwen and Aspinall will face each other next week, and possibly the week after as well. The bigger the margin, the more pressure will be taken off.
Luke Humphries lost his opening match against Gerwyn Price last week in Birmingham, and that led to 'Cool Hand Luke' almost completely losing out on first place. With three rounds of play remaining and a nine-point deficit, that's almost an impossible task. However, the world number one's real goal is to make it to the final night, and Humphries has nearly fulfilled that task. If the results fall his way Thursday night, Humphries could even secure a ticket to the playoffs on Thursday night.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the mutual balance it is now completely equal between the numbers one and three of the world. Van Gerwen once led 13-5 in the head-to-head, but now the score is 15-15. Two of the three showdowns in this Premier League were victorious for Humphries.
Stephen Bunting v Chris Dobey
Mathematically, Stephen Bunting is not yet eliminated, but 'The Bullet' needs three weekly titles and some luck with the other results to still make the playoffs. With eight points, he is currently 12 points behind the top four. It will also be a tough story for Chris Dobey, as he has eight points to make up in the remaining three rounds of play.
In the past two rounds of play, both Englishmen had to return home with zero points, while before that they showed some nice things. In the ninth week Bunting surprisingly took the weekly title in Berlin, and two weeks later Chris Dobey took the title in Rotterdam. That was at the expense of Bunting, who beat 'Hollywood' 6-2.
That final in Rotterdam was the second time Bunting and Dobey met in this Premier League, and the first meeting was also won by Dobey. The darter from Bedlington usually performs well against Bunting anyway, as fourteen of the eighteen duels between them have been won by Dobey.
ADVERTISEMENT
Winner's bonus of £10,000
A unique aspect of the Premier League is that a separate tournament is played each week of play, with the winner receiving an additional £10,000. This means that a player who manages to win multiple weeks of play can boost his prize money considerably. Since the league lasts for 16 weeks, an additional total of £160,000 can be distributed to the winners of these nights of play.
With performances, players also earn points toward the Premier League standings. The winner of a weekly tournament receives five points, while the losing finalist takes home three points. Semi-finalists keep two points and players who lose their opening match go home scoreless.
Format
Tournament Phase
Quarterfinals/Semi-Finals/Finals: Best of 11 legs
Playoffs
Semifinals: Best of 19 legs
Final: Best of 21 legs
TV Guide
ADVERTISEMENT
Thanks to Viaplay, you don't have to miss a single darts moment. Every Thursday night starting at 7 p.m., the channel will bring you the matches live, including extensive analysis and interviews with the main players.
The broadcasts usually last until midnight, allowing you to enjoy a full evening of pure entertainment and top-level darts at the highest level.
Distribution of prize money
With a total prize pool of £1,000,000, the eight contestants are competing not only for the title, but also for a substantial amount of money. All participants are guaranteed £60,000 in prize money. This eventually rises to the top prize of £275,000 for the winner.
However, players can also win a bonus each week. For every winner of a mini-tournament during the league phase, a sum of £10,000 is up for grabs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Schedule Premier League Darts 2025
Night 14 - Thursday, May 8.
First Direct Arena, Leeds
Quarter-Finals (7pm)
Rob Cross v Gerwyn Price
Nathan Aspinall v Luke Littler
Michael van Gerwen v Luke Humphries
Stephen Bunting v Chris Dobey

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







